Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Soledad

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Soledad

  1. That swings it. Spoke to Andertons and as the CEB3 was on back-order, have swapped to a CE5 (in stock too). The hi and lo pass control really appeals - to adjust treble cutoff which is where I started from. I really suspect they are both good but it's the dual-concentric on the right that I fancy. Must say it's a great pedal for the tenner it cost me (secondhand). I'll keep it and prob use at home. With the active fretless straight throuth the BCH1 I can get a good chorus sound without the toppy problem, but it doesn't work well with the fretted on my pedalboard.
  2. BCH1 - got it for a tenner from a fellow BCer. It's been good just used in isolation but it's tempting to assume spend more = better... doh. I need to resequence pedals when I get the CEB3. It's at the end of the chain (only pre/comp/chorus so not silly long) - will try Ch/pre/comp I think, and any other permutation.
  3. I was a bit torn, but ordered a ceb3. I can use the Sadowsky pre to control top if I need to (or just roll back on the bass) - but either is going to be way better than my very budget Harley Benton. Surely?? !
  4. Exactly what I needed to know. Will get a CEB3. 👍
  5. it's fine, just pm your address, happy to pass them on
  6. was the predecessor the CE5? They're both still available but Boss say the CE5 is for guitar and keys. BUT I do like the top and bottom filter on the CE5, as I want to close in on the mids with the fretless. As I understand the CEB3 just has hi-pass. Are they pretty much evens or is one better than the other for bass?
  7. Came off an Aria 34". Loved the sound - bright, ringy but with v good body and depth. See. you actually get a review for free too. Asked the guy I got the bass off what they were, he couldn't remember. He never played the Aria, neither did I (no disrespect, just not a keeper) so strings are virtually unplayed.
  8. Just found a review of the CEB3 by @greghagger - think it'd do me (or the CE5). Like the CE5 hi and low filters though.
  9. Should say that on the box - liking seasick. So there's a CE-5 and a CEB3, the 3 seems bass dedicated, and they cost the same. With chorus I roll the top end back so the mids sing, so toppy chorus is not it. Shall I get a CEB3 then?
  10. Mainly for the fretless, but sometimes the main (P) bass. I used the TC toneprint on their head, good given it's a preset chorus. Now I have a cheapo on the board, it's OK but gets very toppy - I want lots of mids, fair bit of depth and normally slow speed. Any recommendations please?
  11. wow - would require some very serious changes to my left-hand technique I suspect. How do you actually reach the bottom string higher up the neck ?
  12. very tidy, the amp is very nearly as big as the cab !
  13. yes, that's it. Shims in the neck pocket would be a walk away for me. It's on a J serial '89 and all else seems spot on. Need to see it I think. ooh, bad mistake. V nice P - sunburst / tort is the classic finish I think. V nice indeed.
  14. Thanks for that, and @LeftyJ - the fact that at least some do is helpful. It's one aspect of a bass I needed to check. So this is GOOD. May have to buy it... that is BAD p.s. and WOW that Squier Strat back is tasty indeed👍
  15. Did any 80s / early 90s MIJ Fenders have a black plastic shim between the neck plate and body? Never recall seeing this but I'm no expert.
  16. He's right of course - I find the logo variants quite confusing. The original '61 referred to earlier has this logo so all good !
  17. He's right - sorry thought that was LP blue ! Should be very tasty. Small question - is the stack knob pre '62 and if so should the headstock logo be spaghetti?
  18. Almost exactly what I'd like, and love the colour. Basically I 'need' a lake placid P, and a fretless Jazz, unlined and maybe that mucky white colour with tort plate. (See the CS Jazz for sale on here - that but unlined fretless👍👍👍)
  19. same here - why Fender insist on lining the fretless boards is beyond me. At least offer an option. It's probably a hang-over of the Jaco Jazz which he stripped the frets out of. But actually putting lines onto an unmarked fretless neck seems moronic to me. I might pick up an affordable used Jazz somewhere and spend on getting an unlined board fitted. btw, am in contact with Mark about a '64 P, Lake Placid...
  20. Got a MAG250 210 combo for £120 recently - it went straight into the rehearsal space and stays there. For rehearsals I just go straight in (P, no pedal board) and it sounds very good indeed. Obviously lacks the lower body mass due to its 2 x 10s - a 115 ext would probably round things off very well. I reckon the Ashdown gear is an absolute bargain - almost picked up a clean 210 cab for £40 recently, and the EVO heads look really good at the going prices. I believe Adam Clayton is an endorsee - it's really good gear, maybe just out of fashion?
  21. Visited Dave at 'Valve Amp Repair Service' in Gravesend yesterday - took my Trace Twin Valve to him for sorting (new caps probably). The place is a vintage mine. He works from home and every space and corner has some vintage amp gear in it. Mesa, Vox, Marshall, Ampeg stuff n bits all over the place. He builds his own Blues 30 and Blues 60 valve heads - nicely done for the guitar players.
    Happy to do older solid state but avoids Class Ds as he reckons they are not designed to be serviced in the old way. This guy is a find, and really looking forward to getting the Trace back.

  22. Thanks @ped and @dannybuoy. Main thing first was to use the effects loop or not. So not. The tuner can tee off the pre so I'm guessing sits aside the signal path. I will try a few sequences but I'll start with pre>comp>chorus and see how it goes. Thanks for the help
  23. I've messed with the odd effects pedal over the years just putting the chorus (say) between bass and pre-amp in. But I now have 4 boxes to hook up and I'm not sure the best way to do it. The boxes are a Darkglass SS comp, Sadowsky pre; chorus, tuner. The main amp I use is a GB Streamliner (valve pre) with send/return on the back. Do I series all 4 between bass and pre-input, or series all 4 between pre and power (through the send/return), or do I need to split the pedals and put some before pre-amp, and others into the send / return. I'm guessing the Sadowsky in particular would be best before the pre-amp, but compression may be better post pre-amp. Basically, don't know.
  24. I aim to get the things I use most as close as possible - so all the marking tools, mallets, scrapers etc. On the 6' bench I have 2 cantilevers screwed underneath (2" x 2" anything) and they project out the back about 6" or so. I built a long box which sits on those and lies so top is flush with benchtop. Put several dividers in and keep all the smaller and much used tools in there, including 2 small planes, marking knives, gauges, squares, pencils, mallets etc etc. Basically I aim to not move around! Planes under, saws very close by, chisels the same. The good old 80/20 rule - i use 20% of tools 80% of the time - put those within immediate reach. I know benches and workspace is a personal preference thing, but it all works right for me.
×
×
  • Create New...