Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

NikNik

Member
  • Posts

    1,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NikNik

  1. On 27/06/2023 at 18:22, jezzaboy said:

    Just a wee tip if you are sending gear back. I always take plenty of photo`s of the product, then of it back in the box and the box itself. Might not do any good if an issue comes up but it might help.

    I started doing this a while back, but for sales, after reading a horror story where a buyer claimed a guitar was badly damaged, the the box showed no damage.

    • Like 1
  2. It went for £1640.71.

     

    A zero-feeback seller, selling a CT at a low auction start should be enough to raise the red flags.

     

    Japan Holic is selling another CT at £12, 660; another shop - with high feedback numbers -  is selling the same model for the same price. 

     

    This is one reason I refuse to buy from Japan over ebay, for I seriously doubt that some of these shops even have the guitar/bass they're advertising.

     

     

  3. 5 minutes ago, Paolo85 said:

    ...when I say it fits Squer bodies alright, there is a caveat: it needs a massive shim to tilt the neck away from you as the Fazley neck is much thicker

    Why not sand the heel?

  4. 1 minute ago, Paolo85 said:

    Well, I am also enjoing a lot. But I love to practice standing and it's heavy for me. Because of that, I was considering selling and getting a HB B450fl. GAS for the HB per se was not strong though. As it happens, however, I have figured out the Fazley neck fits Squier bodies alright. Then you have a massive neck diver.. but things would maybe be different if I chopped thr headstock and went for 2+2 instead of four in line. Basically I am mulling a bitsa monster...

    Yeh, it is a bit heavy.

  5. On 15/06/2023 at 14:05, Paolo85 said:

    No point in selling it. In fact, it's become my go-to fretless in the house. It sounds great acoustically, with plenty of growl.

     

    I ended up re-radiusing the board to 9.5, sanding out the roughage up near first position, and giving it a few light passes of diluted shellac. 

  6. 17 hours ago, BigRedX said:

     

    The concerts that made up Wings Over America (album) and Rock Show (film) were recorded on multi-track tape (probably 24-track) using one of the many mobile studios that were popular for live recordings in the 70s, so having a different mix to that heard FoH with the bass guitar louder would have been simple. How does the mix compare with the audio only version on WOA? Like most "live" albums of the time, various parts were overdubbed afterwards, in the case of WOA specifically the backing vocals, but anything else that required attention would have been touched up if necessary. Both releases were complied from multiple concerts and in the case of Rock Show it is possible that footage from a different performance to the audio was cut to fit, if the best audio and visual performances didn't come from the same gig.

     

    Very few "live" recordings of any kind are done direct to stereo, even when they are being broadcast in real time, the broadcast mix will be done separately to the FoH mix, and nearly always recorded to multi-track to allow for the possibility of fixing errors and adjusting the balance at a later date for release or rebroadcast.

    I totally get that. Initially, I thought it had been overdubbed. Now, I'm not so sure.

    • Like 1
  7. 4 hours ago, EMG456 said:

    Interested to learn what actually made you think it's an overdub @NikNik?

     

    Looks to me as though it is very well synced with the video at all points. The bass part is different to the one on the original studio recording- more rhythmically constant in keeping with someone who's concentrating on getting the vocal right. He fluffs the G after the stop leading into the last verse - he's not even on screen for that one so if it was dubbed surely he would have taken the opportunity to fix it?

    Aside from it being very upfront in the mix,I thought his playing appeared out of sync at times, and some notes didn't look like they were 'played' I watched it a few more times and now I have my doubts that the bass was overdubbed.

  8. Fender Japan has, or had, non-export models. I picked this CAR Jazz up in Belfast a few years ago; the seller had bought it from a guy in UK who managed to get it shipped over. Matching headstock and factory fitted reverse gear tuners. I swapped the 'plate out for a minty and added a tug-bar and a '62 circuit. I've kept the original circuit and the original while 'plate.20211016_075728.thumb.jpg.f091a94d408ec67b21ed9f293dede7f3.jpg

    • Like 4
  9. 48 minutes ago, lemmywinks said:

    My favourite was the old Kay SG body with some random neck bolted on, made even less sense than that crazy bridge one.

    My fav was the 12 to 6 acoustic guitar conversion, with the jack socked moved to the lower bout. I thought I had a copy of it but I can't find it. Either that or his 'Big Hands' 7 to 6 conversion where he butchered the saddles with a Dremel.

     

    Found them!!

     

    Screenshot 2023-05-26 160542.png

    Screenshot 2023-05-26 160627.png

    • Haha 2
  10. 42 minutes ago, Norris said:

    Wilkinson parts are budget, but generally better quality than unbranded parts.

     

    The only Wilkinson thing I can think I've used is the bridge on my telecaster (3x saddles in compensated pairs), which is much better than the individual saddle bridge I used originally 

    I have that unit. It's excellent.

    • Like 1
  11. 15 hours ago, Bassassin said:

    To lighten the mood a little - knowing what I do of the man, he was probably amused to have (sort of) lent his name to much-missed Edinburgh punk scene stalwarts, The Gin Goblins. :)

    They had an off-shoot called Gargleblud

×
×
  • Create New...