-
Posts
12,695 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by dave_bass5
-
I’m looking for a small box (not rack box) that will take a single midi channel input, and output the signal on multiple midi channels using just a single cable. 2 out is fine, moire is better. This is to use a master keyboard to trigger some of the sounds on my Yamaha MODX. My master keyboard will only transmit on one channel, and the MODX has its midi channels set in stone for the parts. I dont want to go down the software with ipad route, so something like the Event Processor plus looks ideal, but a bit pricy for what I’m trying to achieve. Anyone seen anything cheaper (less than £150). I dont mind if its part of something else rather than a dedicated midi box.
-
I tried to get it back after the first lockdown but didn’t have an luck. It was from Dawson’s. I’d still love to have it back, but has to be that one as it was really just perfect for me.
-
Yes, it was a real surprise. When I received it I weighed it on the postal scales at work. These are calibrated so pretty accurate. It felt just as light as my Sandblasted P. And the icing on the cake was it cost £399 new.
-
So I've started looking round to purchase a Source Audio EQ2...
dave_bass5 replied to TrevorG's topic in Effects
I can recommend the Q/strip if it offers enough for you needs, Best EQ ive every owned. -
Best Wireless ‘Bug’ Devices for Home Use
dave_bass5 replied to Deedee's topic in Accessories and Misc
Hah. Don’t worry, i would have pointed it out again if it had been relevant 😁 -
Best Wireless ‘Bug’ Devices for Home Use
dave_bass5 replied to Deedee's topic in Accessories and Misc
No, i told you ages ago when i had to change from my original WL-20 to the WL-20L 😏 -
Best Wireless ‘Bug’ Devices for Home Use
dave_bass5 replied to Deedee's topic in Accessories and Misc
The L doesn't have the cable tone feature, so is a bit more open and has more top end. Thats the only difference as far as I could see when i had both. As an example, i couldn’t use the TC Electronics tone print beaming system with my non L version, as the top end was messed with. The L version worked perfectly. -
Probably down to all those pompous bass players who insist on setting their own EQ 😂
-
All true in my case. I love my 425, as it is as you describe, and I loved the 435 for the same reason as you also describe, but I could never get on with the P34. It wasnt that i was looking for a certain tone, its just the the P34 sat in the middle between my 425 and Fender P and i could never really gel with it. Personal preference of course. Its the TRBX304/5 that has the pre set tone feature. Very nice it is too. I went for the TRBX505 as it also worked in passive mode. Although i always used mine in active mode it was nice to know if the battery went flat I could still use the bass. IIR there wasnt a huge difference between the two modes like one some basses where you can sweep the mids and really change the tone.
-
An Ibby Blazer bass was one of my first basses. I really don’t remember much about it but i agree about the Japanese 80’s basses if my memory serves me well. Boring story but a mate of mine turned up to one of my gigs a few years ago with a Dingwall and a Ibanez Roadstar bass he just brought. He wanted me to use both. We did 3 sets. First with the Dingwall, other two with the Ibby. The Ibby won by miles. I had played the Dingwall before, and it was very easy to play, but seemed sterile and boring. The Ibby was amazing. Such a tight P bass sound which although not too growling, just filled out the mix and had so much kick and character. I have a BB425 and yes, its a bit hotter and has a bit more bite to it. Its the only PJ or JJ ive had that I could play the bridge pup and not feel a drop in body and volume. The two basses sound noticeably different, but still with the same type of sound if that makes sense. I’m sure there are more experienced BB owners here that can put it in better, but you are right, the 434 is more ‘Fender’ P bass sounding.
-
Some VERY good news at last - live music back by the Spring?
dave_bass5 replied to Al Krow's topic in General Discussion
And Tescos 😂 -
Some VERY good news at last - live music back by the Spring?
dave_bass5 replied to Al Krow's topic in General Discussion
Same here. First that i can remember anyway. Our local surgery is very well organised. Same with my local hospitals. I do consider myself lucky though. -
Haha, well within a week of getting the 435 i got put on 80% wages, all gigs cancelled and then got made redundant. I also felt i had enough basses to play bass on at home anyway......oh and then gave up playing bass. Oh, and it was 8lbs. I do regret sending it back still.
-
Haha, I’m not talking about the B string, just the other 4 and in general. Then again, the P34 can obviously be de-tuned, so quite easily get those notes if needed 😏
-
For what its worth i thought the BB435 sounded much better, to me, than the P34 i had. So even within the BB range there are differences. I felt the BB435 sounded much more ‘Fender’ than the P34, which I found to be a bit more polite. Neither sounds like the TBRX though. Oh, and no relevant to this topic, but the BB435 also had a much better B string than the TRBX. Even the Sire V7 that replaced my TRBX had a more solid B string. All 3 are 34’’ so its not a length thing.
-
Having had a TRBX505 and a BB435 I’d say BB all the way. I gigged my TRBX for about 2 years, but never really found it exciting. There was a softness about it. Not sure if that makes sense. I’d say it reminded me of a bass that had Bart BK1’s in it. Polite and up for the job, but not as exciting as it could have been. The analogy about it purring along in a theatre band seems spot on. Its quite a generic tone so fits in everywhere., but doesnt really claim its spot. The BB435 on the other hand blew me way. It had a proper P bass tone with just a bit more kick and growl, and playability was quite a bit better. IIR the BB neck didnt feel as cramped as the TRBX.