obi 2 kenobi Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Hi, I just bought a Lakland 55-02 Skyline to join my USA Stingray 5 which I’ve had for around 15 years. Pretty impressed. Getting used to the different string spacing. I know quite a few of you have both. Interested to know your thoughts. Thanks Quote
Misdee Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago (edited) To me, the Lakland is a bit more polished and refined, the Stingray has a bit more brute force and thump, but both are great in their own way. The Lakland has got so many tones available using the various pickup combinations, the MusicMan has got various flavours of that distinctive Stingray sound using the pickup switch. In terms of how they sound, both are top-draw. I prefer the wider string spacing on the Lakland, but I dislike the 35 inch scale. The neck on the Stingray feels really good, but the spacing is a bit too tight for me and the G string tends to be too close to the edge of the frets. I like both basses but I couldn't live with either because of those things. Edited 7 hours ago by Misdee Quote
bubinga5 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Both great instruments. Try a Lakland 5594. They are everything and more. Greatest modern/traditional electric bass that is made today imo. And that neck. !!!!!!!!! Quote
chris_b Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Nice move. I sold my SR5 to fund a 55-94, which was my #1 bass for 14 years. I briefly owned a very nice 55-02. IMO Lakland's are very special basses. 1 Quote
Sibob Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Back in 2016 I was looking for a new 5 string, and kinda had decided I’d like an SR5. Went and tried a bunch in London and just wasn’t massively impressed, they were ok, but nothing mind-blowing IMO (for the money anyway). Also happened to try a Lakland Skyline 55-01, and let’s just say that the 55-01 is still my main/only 5-string 10 years later. Si Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.