-
Posts
1,674 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by Boodang
-
Filling out the sound with no rhythm guitar
Boodang replied to BillyBass's topic in General Discussion
Doesn't do 4th & 5ths, but a cog T65 does an octave down, octave up, plus some overdrive. -
They were still good! I remember Led Zep played for about 3 hours.
-
PS. Chase & Dave support Led Zep! They were good though.
-
Anybody remember these gigs? Just found my old program.
-
Found some old bass player (us) clippings.... anybody remember this ad?! Getting perfect pitch wasn't as hard as achieving the facial expressions necessary I thought!
-
Filling out the sound with no rhythm guitar
Boodang replied to BillyBass's topic in General Discussion
Yep, I run a TC Flashback2 into a HoF2 and that gives me plenty of options. They've both got slots for toneprint presets as well with some great ones to choose from. -
Filling out the sound with no rhythm guitar
Boodang replied to BillyBass's topic in General Discussion
Also, and this is not for every song, you could use the Gwizdala trick of using an echo, rather than a reverb. He has a preset on the Helix stomp which is also on the TC flashback2, where you get 3 short repeats. Use it subtly and it adds loads but isn't ott like some. I got a tc flashback2 s/h quite cheap and there's a Gwizdala toneprint for this... surprisingly useful. -
Filling out the sound with no rhythm guitar
Boodang replied to BillyBass's topic in General Discussion
As others have said here, don't scoop your sound and keep some healthy mids in there. Pedal wise, I've got an old sansamp which is great for adding a bit of that Ampeg style tone. Also I use an analogue octaver when I want to fill out in a trio. Not so much to fill in for the lack of a rhythm guitar but more to just thicken the sound. I just kick it in when needed in a song and keep the octave sound very low so it's subtle enough to not be a jump in tone. Also, too much and gets a bit artificial sounding. Also the reason for analogue rather than digital octaver is that it has a more organic and less synthy tone... imho. -
If string budget it tight, a compelling argument for that Jameson tone... put a set of flats on and never, ever change them!
-
Fair point!
-
In fact, to simplify the issue, if you turn the comp control full ccw (so in theory it has no effect) and put the eq controls at 12 o'clock (again in theory the eq should have no affect) then switch between bypass and on, the tone of bass changes. In theory there should be no difference but the pedal seems to have an inherent in-built tonal quality which is not neutral.
-
With so much choice these days, and as strings are an essential ingredient in your tone and playability, why settle for less than amazing?!
-
I don't think the Spectracomp settings is the issue as I've loaded the same toneprint on to both; I've using the Captain East on both. When you take the bypass off the spectradrive pedal it kicks in both the comp and eq. The comp seems to be working as I would expect the captain east toneprint to respond but I can't get the eq to sound flat.
-
Got this recently so I could combine the Spectracomp with a 4 band eq and the fact it has an overdrive toneprint as well is a bonus. However.... When I'm just using the Spectracomp with the eq all set at 12 o'clock it doesn't sound neutral, not the same as just using a Spectracomp pedal on it's own. Is it because the eq controls don't have centre detents? Anyway, swapping between the two it's noticable. So, when my fretless goes through this I just want the comp, but when I switch to the fretted I roll off the treble and a bit of high mid. The eq is good, trouble is it doesn't seem to sound neutral when in theory it shouldn't be doing anything. Just wondered if anybody else felt the same / had the same issue as regards the neutrality, or lack of it. The only solution is to use both the Spectracomp and spectradrive with an a/b switch but it sort of defeats the object of why I bought the spectradrive in the first place!
-
Oh, and one thing I did notice when you look at the current line up, the specials have an 11" neck radius and the classic is 7.5". So another thing in the mix if neck radius is important to you.
-
... and have you seen the Darkray? A usa stingray with a darkglass preamp. That has to be interesting.
-
Interestingly the equivalent cost today that Fender were selling the P bass back in the day is around 2K, so not cheap. Makes you realise how far we've come in terms of quality/price, especially in the last few years. My Squier jazz is one of the best I've ever played in the 40 years of being a bassist and even with the hardware mods I've done still very cheap by comparison.
-
Worse thing I ever did was to get a custom made bass as a headless! Now I have a great bass but limited string choice... in theory you can clamp any string but in practice a lot of strings don't like this and destroy themselves under this abuse they weren't designed for. My fav strings have a synthetic core and even come with a warning on the packet about being delicate when installing (they're not delicate for playing purposes). If I want to be be 47 quid less well off all I have to do is try and put them on my headless!
-
Are you actually saying flats inferior to roundwounds or did I miss the satirical element?! Oh, and the large number of spaces between text and emoji??
-
Maybe a fretless model should be called a Precision (not)
-
Aha, well some clarification in the 'five watt world' YouTube history of the P bass; the name purportedly comes from a combination of the frets, the precise tone from the scale length, and the precise way in which they were machine made.
-
Of course, if the name refers to the tone rather than the frets then it's not an oxymoron!
-
Maybe it comes with exceptional intonation built in!
-
Talking of the ubiquitous Fender Precision bass in another thread here has reminded me of something I read ages ago but can't find again and thus makes me think I'm making this up.. so any clarification gratefully received! It goes like this; in an interview with Leo he states that the Precision name came less from the frets and more from the fact the scale length was carefully chosen to give a precise tone where unlike an upright the overtones did not overwhelm the fundamental note. So in his experiments they were after the longest scale length where this would be the case and thus ended up at 34" and the precise tone they were after. Plenty of mention in the history books about scale length experiments but not about the reasons for it and the precise tone. Did I dream this!!
-
Can't comment on edited toneprints but the phone app works a treat now with no issues for me. I've got a Spectracomp, spectradrive, hof2, flashback2 and wiretap and the all work perfectly with the app. The wiretap had sooo many issues with v.1 but with the new firmware updates it's sorted. Love the Spectracomp, have settled on the tri-band captain east toneprint which adds punch to the bass frequencies but doesn't squish the overall sound.