Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Undertone

Member
  • Posts

    96
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Undertone

  1. Aha. Brilliant - thanks very much. Makes sense.
  2. Thanks. I'll certainly play them before buying. I just want to avoid travelling to see every candidate I see advertised if I know there are era's / models that aren't likely to be what I'm after. I played a rather prominent player's '65 last week & it's neck is in a different class to that on my '72 (which is a nice bass - also with binding by the way). I also played another '72 last week & it's neck was only slightly slimmer than mine (not what I'm after) but still a different class to the '65. Interesting the comment above re a '68 with a very slim neck (so perhaps it's possible a post CBS neck can be as thin as a pre-CBS?). Keen to hear more views. Apparently there were A, B, C (maybe D) necks of varying width ACROSS the neck (E to G strings) - do we think any of these are likely to have a thinner neck? Appreciate the contributions.
  3. Hi - I'd appreciate tapping all you knowledgeable people out there. I have a '72 Jazz bass whose neck is kind of chunky & I'd like to move to an earlier model but am unsure as to how far I need to go back to get a significantly slimmer neck. I mean smaller distance from front of fingerboard to back of neck, say at the 12th fret or something I suppose - whatever's common sense. By signfiicantly slimmer, let's use 1961-1965 or a subset thereof as a benchmark (acknowledging there's probably variation within this period, but guessing that this variation is probably small relative to the width difference between this period & my '72). Another factor is cost, since jumping from 1966 to pre-1966 is accompanied by a material increase in price (refins are fine but the price still jumps). If I really have to go for 1961-65 then so be it. (I recognise there are plenty modern alternatives out there & have been exploring these too, probably for a 5-string...) So, do folks know, is a pre-'66 neck materially thinner than a '66? than a '67? than a 68?... I'm sure someone has specs out there, which I'll also find interesting, but am equally interested in feedback from folks who've played them, as feel is as important (if not more). Many thanks.
  4. Which area in London are you in please?
  5. Hi. You say RH450 but the picture's a classic. Just to confirm, is it in fact a RH450? Thanks
  6. Ah - sorry - just joined the site today (first one), saw this thing & went for it...not yet sure of the ettiquette...
  7. Hi. I think I'll take it thanks - how do I get in contact with you? Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...