Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

bassmansam

Member
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bassmansam

  1. 1 hour ago, EBS_freak said:

    Shure PSM300 with premium pack is probably what you are looking at. (not a bad system if you haven't got to co-ordinate any other wireless IEMs from a different brand. The PSM300 has fixed bands - you can't set your exact frequencies - only the ones that come baked into the unit).

     

    If you think you need the flexibility of tuning, that would push you to the EW300 or PSM900.

     

    Another option is to look into the MI-58 (not the 909 or 24). I haven't tried them personally - but they are getting great feedback from my friends. Digital and pretty low latency to make them a viable option for IEM use.

     

    Do make sure your singer invests in good IEMs too... no purpose having all this lovely wireless if it's being compromised by the last unit in the chain!

     

    Thanks! Yes I think she's looking at the UE7s 👍

  2. 1 hour ago, itu said:

    Phones is an output with powerful enough amp to drive headphones.

     

    Line output is designed to drive an amp input, and its level may be adjustable, or not. It has not power to drive headphones. Maybe you will hear something but the level is really low. You would need an extra amp between the unit and the headphones.

     

    Thanks I can use a spare amp. Would there be any loss in sound quality doing it this way?

  3. 44 minutes ago, Dan Dare said:

    The advantage of a sub (or subs) is that you do not need large top boxes. Anything more than 10s is overkill, really, unless the venue is massive. Subs really need to be of high quality. Budget offerings are prone to suffer from poor definition, overhang and the dreaded one note bass. It's better to have one good 'un (low frequencies don't need to be in stereo) than multiple cheapies. One of the best sounding compact rigs I ever heard was a little Nexo PA, comprising two 10" + horn tops and a single 12" sub. It didn't sound in any way small. It did, however, have some pretty serious amplification (made by Yamaha, which owns Nexo). Size doesn't always matter.

     

    I think you're right and our current rig sounds great (732as + 8003 AS Sub) however as I've said we're now facing a transport issue which means we'll only be able to take tops with us...So either RCF 735s/745s or the new 935s/945's to put the whole band through. 

  4. 47 minutes ago, Phil Starr said:

    I guess it depends upon how you see it and of course how it works out in practice. A pair of 932's are around £1500 and a single RCF sub around £1000 depending upon which you choose. That's £2500 vs £3200 for a pair of Evox 12's. If you wanted two subs then the conventional system would be £3500. The column then sits in the middle price wise. Then it comes down to performance and practicality.

     

    Performance wise the conventional system is a better known system for me and with two subs will probably exceed the maximum output of the Evox. In practice I'm not likely to use the subs very often on past performance. The practicality of the Evox is that I'd be using the same system for every gig and it has a smaller footprint than speaker stands so is actually going to be better for smaller venues. The directional properties are appealing too, a broad flat fan of sound so most of the audience get the same sound and less spilling back onto the stage all sounds good. Moving the crossover out of the midrange is appealing too and could mean a better presentation of vocals. That's all promise though and it's how it will work out in ever changing venues each with different acoustics that remains to be discovered.

     

    As you say it's a lot of money. I'm not one of life's natural early adopters either but it's still an intriguing prospect.

     

    I think for us we'll struggle to transport even the evox 12s. I think it will be either 935s or a pair of 745s without subs which seem to pop up from time to time. 

  5. 21 hours ago, Phil Starr said:

    I've had systems with subs for years 'just in case'. I only take them out when I know there is a need and have used them once a year or maybe less. Essentially they've only gone out for open air gigs with no hired PA or indoor gigs where they've been there as robust stands to stop people knocking over the PA. How often do you play functions with 500+ guests I wonder? This is all with 12" tops 15's will give you a little more so the times when you'd 'need' subs are going to be very limited. 

     

    I'm thinking of upgrading our PA if we get back to regular gigging again, I'm seriously looking at some of the RCF Evox type systems, these would solve your space issues for transport and to my mind look really professional for a function band compared with the look of 15's on stands.

    The Evox 12 looks lovely. Pricey though! 

  6. My wedding band are all electronic now with iem & electric kit...no backline. 

     

    We're currently using 2 x RCF 732a tops and 1 x RCF 8003 II sub. Unfortunately transport is getting tight and we need to ditch the sub and run everything through the tops. 

     

    Been looking at the new RCF 935's. Think that would be decent for weddings/functions as stand alones? 

     

    Thanks 

     

  7. Now decided to go for some PJ pickups in my 5 string order

     

    In terms of tone I'm not keen on anything too bright or harsh but solid lowend/mids with plenty of punch - modern as oppose to vintage (hopefully that makes sense). 

     

    Although subjective I'll want something that can do a decent Slap tone too. 

     

    I'll have a pre. Probably either an East or Bartolini. 

     

    Been looking at Bart, Delano, Aguilar, Linda Fralin pickups but never owned a PJ so any advice welcomed. Thanks 😃

     

     

  8. 42 minutes ago, NickA said:

    Lots of people love Bart's; I find them rich but a bit dull and free of sparkle. 

     

    Plus one for East electronics.  Sound aside, they'e beautifully made and easy to install and adjust.

    Thanks. Any pups you'd recommend with them or are they a good all rounder? 

  9. Looking for some advice on new pre and pups in my new custom order 5 string. 

     

    I already have a JJ bass so I'm after something a bit different - PJ / Soapbars perhaps? 

     

    In terms of tone I definitely prefer modern over vintage and like lots  growl and punch in the mids. I don't play metal or heavy rock but most other genres. 

     

    Been looking at Bartolini, Glockenlang and East Uni Pre. Needs to be a 5 pot pre for the bass I'm getting as there's no control plate. 

     

    Aguilar, Delano, Bartolini  Nordstrand Pups. 

     

    Any advice would be great to hear 😁

  10. Looking at nickel strings for my 5 string Jazz. I used to love Dr lo riders but after putting them on my new 35 scale they feel too rough and tight. Much preferred the nickels that came with it originally..... 

     

    Looking at DR Sunbeams and Nickel D'addario. Has anyone tried both sets? What did you think? 

     

    I play function tunes so a mixture of 60s - present day 😁

  11. 55 minutes ago, fretmeister said:

    I looked at this a while ago.

     

    EMGs or Barts if you want covered PJ 5 string. There’s not many options, and depending on your string spacing it might be limited even with pole pieces.

     

    FWIW I really rate the EMG X series. Loads of headroom and the P actually sounds like a good P pickup.

     

    Nordstrand will make you a custom set if you want but it’s a bit spendy! 

     

    Thanks...Have you had enough experience with EMG/Barts to describe differences? 

  12. Looking at adding PJ pickups to my 5 string custom bass.

    I play in a function band so music from 60s-present day. I like having both pickups wide open most of the time and definitely prefer a more modern sound to vintage.

    Only thing is I'd rather not have exposed poll pieces from an asthetics point of view. That probably limits my options but would much prefer it this way.

    Any advice would be appreciated.

    Thanks in advance.

  13. Superior to Mono's dual bag imo. I spent a long time researching double gig bags and the IGIG came out on top. 

     

    Ridiculous amounts of storage and superb protection for 2 basses

    Overall condition is good and you'll see from the photos that the inside guitar compartment is excellent. The only minor damage is the mini inside pockets stitching has come away, however, the main 2 big storage compartments work great and is plenty.

     

    Collection from South Beds

    Here are some extra specs and detailed video of the same bag.

     

    Check out this detailed video here.

     

    * Heavy-duty 1680 denier ballistic nylon fabric.
    * Accentuated with suede or 840 denier nylon.
    * Multi-layered foam padding with flexible board for enhanced protection
    * Customized metal logo and zipper sliders.
    * Spacious pockets with MP3 player earphone access, organizer, key holder, and guitar cable strap.
    * Three supportive handles for secure and comfortable grip.
    * Ergonomically designed adjustable backpack straps and padded mesh back support.
    * GigPillow (TM) system protects the guitar's vulnerable joint connecting the neck and body with shock absorbing memory foam.
    * Animal free

    20211107_120304.jpg

    20211107_120322.jpg

    20211107_120823.jpg

    20211107_120428.jpg

    20211107_120408.jpg

    20211107_120613.jpg

     

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...