[quote name='blackmn90' post='1283113' date='Jun 26 2011, 04:25 PM']Yh when i mean professional musician i meant the Stuart Pearce, Phil Mulford, Laurence Cottle busy bee types. What made me think is iv seen a few great players at ACM doing master classes and when they explain what they do it seems so simple. Laurence Cottle said for him it was hours of practice and playing lots of different genres when gigging that got him to where he is now. So is it literally just having the motivation to really want to do it that separates people from going and doing it or keeping it as a hobby?
Also i do completely appreciate the not wanting to make your hobby your job thing.[/quote]
not it isn't literally just having the motivation
[quote name='Blademan_98' post='1283262' date='Jun 26 2011, 07:36 PM']The term professional is used more generally to denote a person who performs commercially in a field typically reserved for hobbyists or amateurs.
Professional = does it for a living
Amateur = does it for fun[/quote]
true
[quote name='merello' post='1283267' date='Jun 26 2011, 07:44 PM']Professional just means you get paid for doing what you do. All the talent in the world means very little if nobody really wants to listen to you. I remember really looking forward to seeing Stevie Vai and my mind wandering after a few songs is they were not 'tunes'. Serving the song is always better than pleasing your own musical self.[/quote]
Very true
You can totally find non-paid musicians to match any paid musician
In my mind the only thing separating those who want to be get paid and those who do is opportunity
The two things that every musician that makes money from their playing had is opportunity and desire
it similar to what people say about luck
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity
No matter of preparation without a change will get your there
equally if you can't deliver when you get that change your not gonna get anyway (now deliver can mean playing note perfect or it can mean bringing something else)