rwillett Posted Tuesday at 11:44 Posted Tuesday at 11:44 On 16/08/2025 at 08:38, Burns-bass said: a fool with a screwdriver. You called? 1 Quote
Grahambythesea Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago I wouldn’t call it a 62; more like a 57- Heinz. Quote
HeadlessBassist Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago If a potential buyer has the required £4500 and likes how it plays/sounds/looks, then why not? Mark & Co at Bass Direct have obviously done their due diligence, so it's up to the potential buyer. Not my cup of tea at that money, but then again, I would never buy a vintage Fender. I like the newer, more reliable ones. 😁 Quote
Steve Browning Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I have a 1972 bass with 68 electrics. Is it a 68 with a replacement body/neck or a 72 with 68 electrics? Quote
binky_bass Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago If it has to be labelled as one, then I'd say it should be labelled as the one where the parts of the bass are in the majority. So, a 72 for yours. Or... just label it fairly! This Bass Direct bass should be titled as 'Fender bista bass with unknown body, 62 neck with new fretboard and some original 62 parts'. 1 Quote
Steve Browning Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Which is how I describe it, it has to be said. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.