TheGhostofJaco

I have a Sadowsky P/j and it sounds glorious. No phasing with both pickups engaged. In fact that attack is pointier, more pronounced. Also like that the bridge pickup stands on it's own, volume and tonewise. Sadowsky explained how he did it, but I can't remember. I think the key is have an active bass that lets you put a little more bass into the back pickup. I have also owned some P/Js that didn't really have this magic and the back pickup was useless on it's own. With the Sadowsky I have a legit 3 tone bass, so I am very happy with it. Owned mine 4 years now.

I prefer the build of the wilcock as well.again, my preference and opinion based on a pretty long career as a bassist. Enjoy the serek, im not attacking your instrument.

Its my opinion and I said it. I picked the Wilcock for the reasons I stated. Pretty easy decision for me. To be clear Mullarkey V Midwestern in my case.

Yes and I much prefer the Wilcock. That’s saying a lot since serek’s are very cool. The Wilcock is just a better built bass with a fatter, warmer tone - IMO. I played the Mullarkey model. For Serek, I am very intrigued by his 5 string models. One of those may be in my future.

Probably one of the most impressive bass demos I have come across. Absolute crushing tone.

I thought he ordered them and then was curious about our opinions on others?

There is no best, but the Fender Pure Vintage ‘63 has to be right up there. It beat out the Geezer Butler for me by a little. Geezer is more focused on high mids, Pure Vintage gives you more low mids. Pick what you prefer.

Most Warwick have 36 frets? - is this a serious post or trolling?