Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Quilly

Member
  • Posts

    1,350
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Quilly

  1. These always seemed a little but awkward looking to me. I wouldn't like to have a valve head perched on top of it. Apart from having the top speaker closer to your ears I don't see the big advantage of it over say a 4 x 10, 2 x 10 or 1 x 15 in terms of practicality  

  2. Instead of starting a new thread on this item Id like to chime in with my own Query. I currently own a Sandberg VS and a Fender Precision Player. The Sandberg has delano pickups with those big pole pieces and a 2 band glockenklang preamp while the fender has the standard fender stock ones with the usual passive set up. I was happy with the Sandberg up to the point where I bought the fender, now I think the sound from the Sandberg seems a but too scooped and clean sounding and the fender seems to have a lot more classic P bass character. I think the problem with the Sandberg might be those pickups. Would anyone have any recommendations for an old school aggressive sounding pickup with plenty of midrange punch       

  3. On 15/05/2018 at 08:33, Adee said:

    Here's my JJ4 California Hardcore Aged 2011 model, it has the older ABM bridge, Delanos and 2 band active

    its a complete dream to play, sounds amazing ...

    19858433_10212549409586654_1471918882_n.thumb.jpg.fd05c50e0f63200737df244cd7163537.jpg19873797_10212549409626655_368551604_n.thumb.jpg.81e1e05ce2c0ec8b45b08272bed84d43.jpg

    Not big into aged basses myself but Sandberg do it really well. 

  4. 5 minutes ago, tegs07 said:

    I’ve not found any issue with the hardware.

    Pros of Sandberg: German engineering and high attention to detail. Very modern and refined take on classic P, J and MM bass.


    Cons of Sandberg: German engineering and high attention to detail. Very modern and refined take on classic P, J and MM bass.

     

    Some may find the sound and styling a bit lacking in “warmth”character and “vibe”. 

    I've both a Fender Precision bass (Mex player) and a Sandberg VS, on paper they should sound the same but they don't. The Sandberg seems to have a cleaner "airer" scooped sound (even with EQ bass and treble set to 0) whereas the Fender has more of a bark, and seems to have more of a midrange "Jean-Jacques" dirty snarl which I love. I wouldn't say the fender is 'warmer' than the Sandberg but its definitely got more lower midrange punch and attitude. Its been noticed by my non bass player bandmates.       

    • Thanks 1
  5. 16 minutes ago, foldyman said:

    So, a couple of folks have complaints about the quality of hardware on Sandbergs on that other forum, in particular the bridge being made of cheap metal.

     

    What do owners here think?

     

    Have one on order and I'm all spooked about it.

    No problem with me , I’ve a sandberg California vs since 2010 and I’ve never had any issues , my new basic seems well built with no cheapness detected anywhere 

    • Thanks 1
  6. 45 minutes ago, Obra said:

    After a lot of misunderstandings, I made a video about the Sandberg Bass bridge. Hope You will enjoy it 🙂.

     

     

    Yep, I didn't like Low End Lobster having a go at the bridge design. If he bothered googling it he would have seen that its quite easy to adjust anything.  My only tiny gripe about this bridge is that the intonation adjustment and the fact that you have to move the saddles with your fingers, in this regard I think the fender design is better and you get more control just turning a screw. 

    • Like 3
  7. Just received my second Sandy from BTM guitars in Germany. I’m actually a bit  in awe at the quality of the woodwork, finish and hardware. the bass wasn’t outrageously expensive at all (considerably cheaper than a stingray or US professional fender) and it has the fit and feel of a premium instrument. 
    I’m not into fancy wood finishes or too much glitz or crazy electronics but I really like the wood on this bass. I think the single MM pup in the sweet spot and 3 band EQ is the perfect set up. Enough versatility but not enough to cause option paralysis. It nails that stingray punch but the 3 band eq seems a lot more practical (I’ve owned a 3 band MM in the past). I had a small jam with it tonight and every note rings clear and is really well defined. Looking forward to some serious gigging with this bass.  

    0C053DAA-D7B2-4135-A503-7A97F958ED91.jpeg

    4462BAC2-E43D-4510-84F9-D37B182068C4.jpeg

    2182BAA6-7CC1-4245-97F3-147959DED03E.jpeg

    D3D94837-6B63-4F83-B85C-4ABCED86BC07.jpeg

    • Like 11
  8. 1 minute ago, Aliwobble said:


     

    while I love the sound of my little bastard, it does not meet my needs as a gigging musician. It just will not get loud enough unless I put it through an 8x10.  My MB500 into a 2x8 or 2x10 is just more giggable.  For recording and practices, however, it is hard to beat that valvy goodness.

    I actually played 2 gigs with a little bastard and a barefaced two10. One gig was with a brass jazz band out doors ! and it held up 'OK' the other was in a pub, same set up, where the landlady really didnt want us to be too loud. The guitarists were using 7 - 15W amps. Again it held up Ok with a smidgen of overdrive, which was fine. I typically use my Ashdown Spyder 550w hybrid as its a bit more portable and with way more headroom. I think I'll just use the CTM100 for rehearsal    

    • Like 1
  9. 29 minutes ago, Reggaebass said:

    I saw that Quilly and I can’t believe that no one bought it, if I didn’t have my V-4B I would have had it, I like my ss amps for convenience but for me the sound of valves is so nice 

    I think the UK import tax (B*word) uncertainty thing might have put people off as I'm based in Ireland. I just had a look at the Ashdown website and they now selling at £1499..crazy !    

    • Like 1
  10. 19 minutes ago, Downunderwonder said:

    By the time you reduced the cab size of a 110 by dint of making a 210iso the amount of timber saved would be less weight than the extra driver. Craziness. 

    I suppose it was about a size statement...but a traditional 2 * 10 isn't exactly unwieldy. I don't think that series of cabs was very successful for them   

×
×
  • Create New...