Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Sidlanir

Member
  • Posts

    312
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sidlanir

  1. 3 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

    I agree that preferences in bridge designs are very personal.

    I like the headless Steinberger ones best, there is an allen screw to lock them solid.

    Yeah, the Steinberger bridge is good ... so far ... attached a picture of one original bridge I bought a few months ago for an headless bass .... not the best quality...

    4FCDDA61-544E-46C0-A36E-12FF44A726E1.jpeg

    • Sad 2
  2. 47 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said:

    I agree that if you change string height, you need to check and may have to adjust intonation, but not the other way around.

    When I set up I like to set string height then adjust intonation.

    With your arrangement won't adjusting intonation also affect string height, so you then have to repeat the process a few times to get it dialled? With an engineering eye I would prefer a mechanism where the two movements are independent.

    If you have done both ,you never need to change these settings ... on all standard bridges the screws are so fine & thin that these can't keep everything in tune for long time , believe me , I have tested a lot of bass bridges in my carer & the only bridge who is the best engineered bridge is the one from Phil Kubucki Ex Factor! 

  3. @SpondonBassed Yes it's a new approach, not my idea, developed by a german friend ,he gave me all his drawings of his patent ...

    The advantage of this design is to reduce to a maximum all moving parts, small screws, springs on all standard available bass bridges on the market .... hope to find some good manufacturer who produce the first prototype ...

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...