MrPring

Is the isolation that much of a factor in the difference between the 2 companies though? -26dB vs -20dB The price and the sound quality are the deciding factors at the moment. The quads are near identical prices but as you up the driver count, you are $200-300 more expensive going 64 audio. It's a bit of a ballache being in Scotland as well, as it would be good to try the same number of drivers in a universal fit from both manufacturers. At the moment I'm leaning towards quads but to double the driver count with JH Audio (JH13V2) its only around an extra £200 + the bonus of adjustable bass. Worth it?

Nice article EBS. Recently read through the thread and there's some great insight from you! Which model of IEMs are you using, did I read correctly you have JHAudio Roxannes? My band have just been offered endorsements with JHAudio and 64 Audio (formally 1964 ears). In reality it's only 20% off Have you any experience with 64 Audio? We Headlined the Garage in London the other week and the monitor engineer was a 64 audio distributor. He got me onto 64 ears and was saying this company is unique due to having some apex technology which stops pneumatic pressure fatiguing your ears. Is this some 'broscience' designed to put you off other companies do you know? It's a bit of a ballache as well the pound being so weak as a quad set of customs from 64 will cost about £900 once customs have had their pound of flesh Any help greatly received! Cheers Rob