Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

jrixn1

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,779
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jrixn1

  1. 8 minutes ago, Burns-bass said:

    The large chords are for melody-instruments and soloing. The smaller chords are the bass notes. The melody players will need you to play these notes to bounce off, so keep it simple and avoid substitutions I’d say.

     

    Isn't that slash chords, which is something else?

     

    E.g. here it's saying the the first seven bars to play an Eb pedal.

    Screenshot_20230717-190926.thumb.png.b9d83e271e5e368c99d282c05246e828.png

     

     

    • Thanks 1
  2. They are just alternative chords; whether to use them comes down to personal taste/preference.  Probably best though to discuss with the rest of the band in advance whether to play the default or the alternative.  Sometimes e.g. tritones you can play them spontaneously, but e.g. I Remember You has a AbM as an alternative to Am7 so you can't just chuck that in willy nilly if the others aren't expecting it.

     

    Screenshot_20230717-190847.thumb.png.4a8dd0c8d78ee1a457eb1258d930ff55.png

    • Thanks 1
  3. +1 for the "band as a business" model.

     

    When running a working band there will always be expenses - not just this PA purchase today, but PA maintenance, lights, storage, insurance, van hire/lease, publicity photos/videos, website, etc.

     

    Instead of doing "musician's fee = band fee ÷ number of musicians", conceive "the band" as its own entity, and paying musicians as just one of the many costs it has of doing business.  Suppose the band does 25 gigs per year at an average of £1k/gig - total income £25k.  Add up all the annual costs (PA, van, etc) - say it comes to £5k.  So there's £20k left to pay musicians: so the fee is £160 each per gig.  This approach might sound more complicated to get going, but it's more sustainable in the long term, fairer, and scalable.
     

     

    • Like 1
  4. Sorry to hear of people's poor experiences, either with Thomann themselves or with DHL Parcel UK.  I have just been through the returns process myself for an expensive and bulky item, which I decided to return on the same day as this thread was started - reading it did give me the jitters!  Here's my timeline, if it helps someone else decide whether to purchase from Thomann or not:

     

    Mon 19th June: I started the returns process (I took loads of photos of the item and the packing process)

     

    Wed 21st June: I dropped it off at a DHL Parcel UK drop-off point, which was a cornerstore/off-licence (I took a photo here too!)

     

    Thu 22nd June: Tracking update: it was collected by DHL

     

    Mon 26th June: Tracking update: delivered to the address which was on the label - Century Logistics in Bury St Edmunds, I assume a logistics partner of Thomann

     

    (Nearly two weeks later)
    Fri 7th July: Thomman - "we received back your return and it will be processed as soon as possible."

     

    Mon 10th July: Received refund from Paypal

     

    So that's 20 days from when I dropped it off to when I was refunded, and fortunately in this instance the process has worked as well as it probably could.  However, I think next time I'll purchase from a UK retailer even if that means a few extra quid on the price, or waiting a few days for it to be back in stock.

     

     

    • Like 1
  5. rcf-DSCF7632.JPG.2f6f33df69e6ff74b26bf83379ef631d.JPG.4e16b789f1af99a0ac15da18e2fafb6a.JPG

     

    This is a Barefaced One10 on a Stagg 14707.  I think it is a similar size to your Trace Elliot - you can always look up the dimensions on the Barefaced website.  The part of the frame which holds the cab is very slightly more than 90° - wasn't a problem for me though.

     

    If you buy stuff online and it doesn't fit, you can always return it.
    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Stagg-14707-Foldable-Amplifier-Monitor/dp/B000YL952E/ref=asc_df_B000YL952E/

     

  6. 54 minutes ago, MichaelDean said:

    In our first studio session, we were shown how to do A and that was the expectation of the studio. The beauty of it is when you've got long runs. You can pretty much hold on to one end, throw the lead and it shoots out in a straight line to your destination. Or you can uncoil half and leave it there tidily next to a mic stand rather than have excess leads going everywhere. 

     

    Is what you are describing over/under?  Whereas method 'A' above is just straight coiling.

     

     

     

  7. Some good suggestions here.  I'll add into the mix the new Markbass MB58R Mini CMD 121 combos - there are two versions, the "P" and the "Pure", and they're around 10kg which is about 1.5kg heavier than the GR Bass combos mentioned - but about half the price.

     

    If your Markbass 801 is almost loud enough, it can take an extension cab.  I don't think Markbass make a matching 8" cab so I'm not sure what the best options is - perhaps a Barefaced One10 (7kg) although it's hard to predict what the results will be when you mix and match cabs like this.

     

    Or you can get a second 801 and run them next to each other (you'll need some sort of pedal to split the signal from your bass).  As you know they are only 6.5kg so that's the lightest option and possibly the cheapest too.

     

    Finally when you say you are struggling against the horns, is that for your own monitoring or do you mean the audience/band needs the bass to be louder?  If it's just your own monitoring, one thing I've done with a big band is to keep using my smaller amplification on stage and in additional use earphone monitoring to give myself a boost. 

  8. Harley Benton PJ-75

     

    £120 including UK postage.

     

    2000.DSCF4736.thumb.jpg.bd21d9b378e47198d14dfb59145afb3a.jpg

     

    https://www.thomann.de/gb/harley_benton_pj_75ow_vintage.htm

     

    Nice 5-string PJ bass - this was my backup when I had a Maruszczyk Jake 5, but I've made a commitment to 4-string basses so no longer needed.

     

    Good demo here from Bass Bonedo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcvnnWGAL0o

     

    It's wired with a KiOgon loom but just as a P bass (i.e. controls are volume and tone) - an upgrade on the stock electronics but note that the bridge pickup is currently disconnected.  Original PJ loom will be included.

     

    The current roundwounds are starting to get tired.  I can include a set of Ernie Ball Slinky flats for £40 if that is of interest.

     

    Good weight for a 5-string at 4.190kg (9lb 4oz).

     

    2000.DSCF4737.thumb.jpg.edcff0f49985e8074e7b8051f013aa34.jpg

     

    2000.DSCF4738.thumb.jpg.de297d4fdd053c7511000c5a0539d836.jpg

     

    2000.DSCF4739.thumb.jpg.ea5cf4cf375591b187bc50d280a1af88.jpg

     

    2000.DSCF4740.thumb.jpg.069e7f139138233c91db338de33533ba.jpg

     

    2000.DSCF4741.thumb.jpg.a4b0e6a0ddb8baa576231c8f4e17d8ac.jpg

    • Like 7
  9. Immaculate Markbass MB58R MINI CMD 121 PURE.

     

    https://www.markbass.it/product/mb58r-mini-cmd-121-pure/

     

    £790 including UK postage, original box, and UK power lead.

     

    This is from the new MB58R range.  There are two 12" combos in the 'mini' range: the cheaper "P" with the piezo tweeter and a 300W head; and this one, the "PURE" with the hi-fi tweeter and a 500W head.

     

    The weight is only 10.3kg, which is insane - load-in is an absolute joy!  The EQ points are well-chosen and intuitive, although personally I ended up using the amp just about flat, with a small amount of the "old school" knob dialled in.

     

    With the gain and master down quite low (both at 9 o'clock), this was enough to match our drummer in an eight-piece function band.  The power-to-weight ratio of the combo is astounding.  However, for me, my heart remains with powered speakers, so moving this Markbass on.

     

    Speaker: 1 x 12” Neodimium Custom
    Tweeter: Markbass hi-fi tweeter
    Speaker Power Handling: 400W RMS (AES Standard)
    Output Power: 500W RMS @ 4 ohm, 300W RMS @ 8 ohm
    Dimensions (WxHxD): 15.35” x 18.50” x 14.17” / 39 cm x 47 cm x 36 cm
    Weight: 22.7 lbs / 10.3kg

     

    I can also add a barely-used Markbass stand for £25, and a brand new Hotcovers custom-fit cover (black 600D polyester) for £35. 
     

    • Like 1
  10. I wouldn't move from the 912 to the 915 - I'd go to the 732.  I no longer own one but I played bass guitar through mine and a little bit of synth. It is very good sound quality, and loud - will definitely do small-medium gigs. 

     

    The 9 series looks nice, is newer but heavier than the 7 series.
    The middle number is key though - compression driver voice coil... (3 is better than 1).

     

    What was your previous rig?
     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  11. 55 minutes ago, Paolo85 said:

    Thanks! They both would do the job! The Yamaha admittedly well above my budget and I was hoping something even cheaper than the mixer although that could be ok in absence of alternatives. The audio comes from my phone so I was also hoping something with 3.5mm jack

     

    ...I am open to odd ideas (eg buying another Zoom just for the aux in, echept a cheaper smaller pedal!)

     

    What about an interface to your phone?
    E.g.
    https://zoomcorp.com/en/gb/audio-interface/audio-interfaces/u-22/

    So now your bass is on your phone, you use GarageBand app etc on your phone to play the backing track + record yourself.

    • Like 1
  12. 30 minutes ago, prowla said:

    The seller would not budge on F&F, even when I said I'd cover the fees for G&S, so I didn't go through with it.

    Just don't pay for goods using F&F.

     

    Perhaps the seller is concerned that if they accept PayPal goods and services, they become open to payment reversal scams or disputes that the item was not as described.  Ultimately when making an online transaction with strangers, there is no way for both buyer and seller to be 100% protected.  Like you I too would not proceed if for any reason I wasn't feeling comfortable.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...