Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

neilmurraybass

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by neilmurraybass

  1. Perhaps I can end this long-running topic by posting my transcription of what I played on Fool For Your Loving. Bilbo's transcription is pretty good, but having used the software/websites that separate recordings into bass, drums, vocals and 'other', it doesn't give a hifi separation of the bass part (though it's helpful) so is not to be relied upon 100%. I promise a video will follow - yes I know I've been promising that for years! More likely a play-through rather than a lesson where different sections are explained slowly. I have never claimed to be a virtuoso that can play 'perfect' lines at 1,000 mph so please look elsewhere for that. I try to play parts that suit the song, according to my own taste, if there is any freedom to do so. Fool For Your Loving NM tab.pdf
  2. I have bitten the bullet, and I hope you don't mind, Bilbo, but I've used your transcription as a basis to adjust to something that's as correct as I can make it - unfortunately it's a steep learning curve regarding the notation software I'm using, and frankly it's much easier for me to play it than notate it! Bearing in mind that I have played Fool For Your Loving perhaps a couple of hundred times in the last 20 years, in my mind it is played in a definite way, sticking close to what's on the record, as I've had to play every note as strongly as possible given the volume that other band members play at! So I have to eat humble pie a little when listening to the original over and over, as some parts could indeed be classed as 'clinkers', in that they're not executed 100% perfectly as I would hope to do these days. However, the hunt for 'perfect' execution means that one plays safe, whereas when Fool was recorded I was 'going for it' (and trying to put some Jack Bruce influence into the bass part) so it was better to have a one- or two-take partly improvised performance rather than a part which was worked out note by note from beginning to end. On Live In The Heart Of The City, I go overboard trying to go one better than what I did on Ready An' Willing, and while some parts are impressive, a lot of it sounds too 'over the top' to me nowadays - very unrelaxed. It'll take some time to produce finished notation to my satisfaction, but I'll put it up on Basschat when it's done.
  3. As much as I’d like to say that I’ll put videos, notation and tab up right away, here are the various reasons why it’s more complicated than that: To varying degrees, my parts are not written, and aren’t exactly the same every time I play them; Ain’t No Love will be slightly different each time, and playing it with a different band might require quite a different feel or groove, quite apart from changing parts around to keep it interesting for myself. So although I’ve played well-known Whitesnake songs over the years with different bands, the parts slowly change over time and I get used to the way I’ve played them recently rather than how they were in the late ’70s. Similarly, I would be unlikely to play Fool For Your Loving note-for-note every time, though I do tend these days to try to stay fairly close to the original. The point is, to reproduce exactly what I played 40+ years ago, with the same tone, with no mistakes, while videoing myself, is quite a tall order. If I am pernickety about other bassists doing not-totally-accurate covers, then I need to be totally accurate myself. If I play along to the original, it’s quite possible that YouTube will block the video for copyright reasons. If I reduce the level of the bass on the original, as it’s quite high in the mix, by technically reducing the volume of sounds that are in the centre of the stereo image, then the drums (and vocals) are reduced too, which makes it harder to play along too - very unnatural. There is a way of ‘remixing’ tracks to play to, but if they get blocked, there’s no point. Although I read music a bit, to transcribe the bass parts completely perfectly will be a laborious task, and even more so when it comes to tab, which I’m not a big fan of. It’s better to use your ears! Furthermore, if you said to me “play exactly what you did on Live In The Heart Of The City”, for example, I probably wouldn’t be physically able to. Apart from being 40 years older, I would need to have been in a touring situation beforehand, with my chops at peak level, instead of sitting around unable to play with anyone because of lockdown. Even back then, I’d had to have a hand operation just after Ready An’ Willing because of subjecting them to over-exertion, so there’s zero chance I’m going to attack the parts with the same energy I had back in 1980. [I think I was often over-busy on Live In The Heart Of The City - trying too hard to impress!] Playing and chatting to the camera may come naturally to Lee Sklar and Guy Pratt but it certainly doesn’t to me, let alone jumping around as if I’m on stage; if I think what I’ve done isn’t up to scratch or embarrassing to watch, I’m not going to put it out. I have done a few collaboration videos but I haven’t been happy with how I came across - my fault, no-one else’s. Shooting and editing videos to a good standard are whole extra skills to master in addition to high quality home recording which I’ve spent many years slowly getting better at. I’d still far prefer to be in a studio with experts taking care of the sound and vision. The living situation I’ve had to be in because of lockdown also doesn’t lend itself to being on top form or producing good work. Not saying I’m not going to, but it has to be good or I’m not putting it out. Same goes for a book!
  4. Just checking - got to the 6th bar - already there's a mistake in the transcription, so I can see I'll have to do my own version! 🙂 I'm not in any way an expert at transcribing or using notation software, so don't hold your breath. Edit: There are 6 errors just on the first page, to be nit-picky.
  5. I haven't checked them through yet, but I'm intrigued as to where someone would get an isolated bass recording of Fool For Your Loving. I'll admit to one 'clinker' but I'd need to be convinced that there are various others on the track.
  6. I keep getting nagged to write a book, but it's such a big task. It risks being very boring to anyone other than bass players, or even to ordinary fans who want sordid tales of debauchery etc! It's hard enough to write a book - even harder to make it entertaining! It would be very easy for me to put down a long list of gigs I did, people I played with etc, which would be exceedingly boring to read. I do plan to make videos where I play the songs I'm mostly known for, though I'm not sure if they'll be 'tuition' videos as such.
  7. That would take a very long time! I try not to customise my basses these days, as I made quite a mess of some of them with a chisel and soldering iron back in the day! I'm afraid that in general I haven't earned nearly as much money as you might think from the bands I've been in, and sometimes it's been very much feast then famine. I've tended to be in well-known bands at the time when they weren't having huge success, or in some cases other people got the majority of the money instead of it being fairly distributed. Playing in We Will Rock You for 12 years solid was the most consistent money I've earned but that's really hard work, extremely repetitive and not a creative outlet, obviously. Sadly, if I bought a high-end bass when I was flush, that would be the first to go when things got a bit grim financially. It's nice to have the best instruments, but frustrating if there aren't actually the opportunities to use them.
  8. Thanks for the nice comments! I don't go on Basschat nearly as much as I should - mostly when I'm buying or selling basses! I bought that bass in spring 1975 as a late '60s P-bass body (had been resprayed black, which I stripped and varnished) already with a Tele bass neck (maybe 1968, can't remember, and it's in storage so I can't check). Immediately I added an EB3 mini humbucker at the bridge but as the pole piece spacing was narrower I had to use Mustang bass saddles pulled together with a piece of thick wire. I used it like this with Colosseum II (Gary Moore, Don Airey etc, 1975-6), mostly using both pickups, and National Health (1976-7), generally just the J pickups, but I think in 1977 I changed the EB3 pickup for two J pickups wired as a humbucker. The P-bass pickup was still as standard then but I don't have any pics that show it in this configuration. I removed all the frets in 1977 (Jaco! See photo below from rehearsals for the Bruford album Feels Good To Me, standing in for Jeff Berlin who was the actual bassist in the band) and sometimes had to borrow other necks or basses for particular songs, sessions or gigs. I had it refretted in late 1977 or early 1978. Soon after joining Whitesnake in early 1978 I needed to change from the mid-heavy tone of the EB3 or J bridge humbucker to a more full sound, so I started using the P pickup (at this time and in Colosseum II I was using flat wounds for more definition - the treble of round wounds was swamped by guitars, cymbals etc. Later with Whitesnake I changed to La Bella Quarterwounds then La Bella Hard Rockin' Steel) but wasn't very satisfied by the tonal difference between the two halves of the pickup. I discovered there was a type of replacement P pickup (Mighty Mite, I think) which had a single polepiece under each string, like Sandbergs today, so the coil size wasn't as wide as in regular P pickups, so I could shave the ends of the bobbins and put two coils side by side, similar to the two coils in a Di Marzio J pickup. I made a cover (as seen in the photo above) with two pickups (4 coils) underneath, and wired it so I could try the various combinations. Until halfway through 1978, it was my only bass, and to make changes to my gear required me to make modifications to that one, as I couldn't afford to buy new instruments. I discovered that I preferred the sound of the coils wired in 'reverse P' configuration, which wasn't a thing then, though Yamaha started doing basses like that soon after. So that's how the bass was when that photo was taken. I used it on the Whitesnake Snakebite EP and Trouble LP, through a miked-up Peavey cab and no DI. After that I moved to Kramer then Aria, plus a borrowed Alembic for some albums. Later, with Black Sabbath in 1995 I reinstated a normal Precision pickup (Bartolini) for some touring, and I used the bass for periods during my 12 years in We Will Rock You in the West End. I shaved down the back of the Tele bass neck during the 70s as I found it too chunky, but went too far and exposed the truss rod! So that neck was retired in the 90s and I've had a couple of different P bass necks on there since then. By the way, there's a version on the net of that photo up above that has my hair sticking up on top and looking very odd, which is a digital mistake I guess, so I'm glad you used the better version! Cheers, Neil
  9. No problem! You guys would probably expertly update the firmware, whereas I might mess it up, leaving it unsaleable! 🙂
  10. Future Impact synth pedal by pandaMIDI Simply the best bass guitar synth - no contest Totally unused - in new boxed condition Price includes shipping within the UK Sorry, not looking for trades or part-exchange. The Future Impact I. is a powerful bass guitar effect combined with a super massive bass synthesiser. The Future Impact I. is able to reproduce all the nine original sounds of the Akai Deep Impact but incorporates a state-of-the-art processing unit that performs operations more than a hundred times faster than its predecessor. It has 99 program slots that are fully programmable with a desktop PC/Mac editor. Future Impact I. is simply the best bass guitar synthesiser on the planet, used by many bass legends like Bootsy Collins, Muse's Chris Wolstenholme, Jamiroquai's Paul Turner and so on. World's fastest string tracking algorithm. Extensive effects section Mix the dry guitar sound, the effected guitar sound and the synthesised sound, then effect it again. Synthesizer specs: 4 oscillators (waveshaped) 2 filters 2 envelopes 512 kHz sampling frequency Effects: Harmoniser Filter EQ Dual Modulation Delay Chorus Distortion
  11. Sandberg custom Ken Taylor/Neil Murray bass 4 string Demeter EQ I had this built to my specifications, from the choices on the Sandberg website. Home use only. There are plenty of small dings and marks, which is Sandberg’s interpretation of ’soft aged finish’, which wasn’t what I was expecting - I would preferred either more obvious relicing or a perfect finish. Of course a great sounding bass, enhanced by the high-quality Demeter preamp. Basic Ken Taylor model Body: European ash (I think) Top: Imbuia with matched headstock Soft aged finish Rosewood neck 2 Sandberg powerhumbuckers, black metal covers, split coil on bridge pickup Electronics: Demeter BEQP-1 Bass EQ Preamplifier - active balance control which mixes two pickups and provides active equalisation for treble, middle and bass. The treble and bass are both shelving controls with 14dB of boost and cut @ 6dB per octave. The middle control is a peak control with plus and minus 12dB of cut and boost @ 6dB per octave. Black hardware with Hipshot Bass Xtender on E machine head Abalone front face dots Sandberg gig bag
  12. A very faithful rendition, in many ways - perhaps 95% correct. It would be almost impossible for me to play the song all the way through exactly the same as the original, partly because I've played it so often since then, and although I stick closely to the album version, I improvise a little. So well done Troy! I have previously recorded the bass line on its own, sticking almost 100% to the recorded version, but that required many drop-ins! Any video would require the same technique, though obviously I could do slowed-down passages too. He uses all four fingers, whereas I mostly use three, bringing in the little finger only when necessary. This is because I play hard, often with heavy or stiff strings - a compromise between ease off playing and the tone needed to cut through two guitars, keyboards & drums. Having read some of the comments under his video, some are good, but some are the typical American obnoxious haters who are intent on slagging anything and everyone, usually from a position of ignorance, which is another reason why I've been slow to put videos up on there. Bah!
  13. I’m a huge Sandberg fan, but this bass hasn’t been used enough so it’s time to move it on. Great sound and playability. I have never gigged it, though there are some small dings on the edge of the body that were present when I bought it 18 months ago. As you can see from the photos, the wood grain is a feature of this particular bass. Not the lightest bass in the world, but that makes for a big sound! Sorry, no trades. 5 string 35” (89cm) scale length 22 frets Ebony fretboard Häussel reverse P and MM humbuckers Glockenklang 9-volt 3-band preamp: Treble +/- 18dB@18KHz Mid +/- 9dB@550Hz Bass +/- 14 dB@40Hz Push/pull volume for active/passive (no passive tone control) Schaller strap-locks Neck width at nut: 43mm Strings overall width at nut: 35mm String spacing at nut: 9mm Strings overall width at bridge: 70mm (String spacing can be adjusted, currently set to 18mm) Weight 11.5lb / 5.2kg Sandberg gig bag.
  14. I do have a YouTube channel, though there's very little on it - nothing so far of my playing (just tried to insert a link to it but Basschat didn't appear to allow that) - look for neilmurraybass, or put Neil Murray in the search bar and scroll down until you find me, ignoring the other Neil Murrays! Shooting my own videos, as with recording at home, is not something I'm very comfortable with - would much prefer to play with others, with a great engineer and cameraman looking after the technical side of things. Not that I can't do it, it's just a lot more clinical and unstimulating. Requests for particular songs or aspects you'd like to be covered will hopefully spur met on to actually do it!
  15. For some time I've been planning to do 'play along' YouTube videos where I do the bass lines that were on the original tracks, starting with Whitesnake, and that's getting a lot closer to coming to fruition. HOWEVER, it seems that Universal Music Group, who own the rights to Whitesnake songs, are the most notorious company for either getting videos taken down or not permitting anything to be earned from them (ad revenue etc), so I'm now debating whether it's workable, or else find a different way of doing it. As far as I know, they use an algorithm which compares the video's audio with tracks in their database, so theoretically if one changes the speed or the key (not very helpful) it might be possible to get round that. On a related matter, a US journalist did a very accurate transcription of the live Fool For Your Loving from Live In The Heart Of The City, and had it accepted, along with an article that I was interviewed for, by US Bass Player magazine. Then the publishers refused to give permission for the transcription to be used, even though I came up with the bass part, not the composers of the song. That was that, then this year the idea was submitted to UK Bass Magazine (who now own Bass Player), but just with short extracts instead of the whole transcription. The extracts were too similar to what I actually played, so now the article might come out, but with no transcribed parts at all, which is a bit pointless.
  16. Selling my Palatino EUB as I’ve decided I’ll never be a double bassist. No shipping - collection or meet-up only. Comes with a spare set of brand new D’Addario Helicore strings, worth at least £120. “The Palatino VE-500 Electric Upright Bass is the answer to many a bass player's prayers. With sweet sound; great looks; and light, portable design, the VE-500 bass has a chambered body of select spruce, The slim, maple neck and curved ebony fingerboard emulate an acoustic upright bass. The Palatino VE-500 bass's adjustable maple bridge rests on the piezo transducer pickup, giving the VE-500 electric upright its large, booming tone.Geared tuners with metal buttons offer easy, accurate tuning. The Palatino VE-500 bass's black-finished metal tailpiece is sturdy and practical. The lightweight endpin offers an infinite range of adjustment with a positive locking mechanism.The Palatino VE-500 is an extremely versatile electric bass with active tone and volume controls and a headphone jack with preamp. Palatino includes a rugged combination leather/plastic carrying bag with backpack straps. True, deep upright bass tones, a chambered body with no amplified feedback at high volumes, and portability make the VE-500 the ideal for the gigging bass player.” Solid spruce top Maple back and sides Chambered body Maple neck with ebony fingerboard Scale approx.: 103 cm Height-adjustable maple bridge Single tuners Active piezo pickup system
  17. Dave Swift, bassist with Jools Holland, talking about the similar platform he uses: "When I’m touring with Jools, I use an Aguilar DB751 Head and a DB410 cab, I drastically reduced my on stage volume as it was becoming problematical, I was ok with that but it started to go down and down until I couldn’t really hear or feel the bass. So I decided to use in-ear monitoring by Ultimate Ears, the clarity and separation was exquisite, but although I could hear the bass, it was like I was in a different county. So I decided to try a Porter and Davis KT Platform which acts like a sub woofer with the bass notes vibrating under my feet. With the in-ears and the platform I now have the ultimate sonic combination.”
  18. Near Oxford. Will travel up to 50 miles - negotiable. :-)
  19. I used similar, though less sophisticated, sub-bass platforms in the West End musical We Will Rock You, and on arena tours in Sweden with Champions of Rock. It’s a great idea that gives you the missing ‘feel’ when you might have mostly in-ears to rely on, or when there’s little or no amplification permitted on stage. Also handy for home recording or practice to avoid cranking speakers up. Doesn’t include an amp to drive it with and should probably be run off a reasonably powerful bass amp - 300W and above. It’s similar to the Porter & Davies KT Platform that Dave Swift uses with Jools Holland’s Rhythm & Blues Orchestra. Sales blurb (edited): “One of the best tools for bass players who struggle to hear themselves in a mix or have to play at low volume and lose the feel of the bass - ideal for rehearsing silently at home, perfect for recording and amazing on stage for that incredible bass feel that is impossible to achieve from from cabs alone. “Bass players using In-ear systems on stage suffer from lacking punch and sub frequencies which prevent them from controlling their playing. Some of you might be familiar with this. “The Bass Board is the ideal subwoofer floor for stages, studio, rehearsal room or even bedroom. Two LFA (low frequency donkey kick) transducers moving more than 10 lbs of mass pump the bass into your body. Feeling your instrument and what you play has never been as intense before. The additional phones-out and the vibration-proof suspension of the base plate let you rehearse at home late at night without bothering your neighbours. “You can power the Bass Board with a regular bass amp, either as a stand-alone subwoofer or as an addition to your existing cabinet.” Input & link to other cabs: Speakon/Jack combo-socket Power handling: 600 Watt/ 8 Ohm Headphone output: 3.5mm Stereo Jack Dimensions: (L x W x D): 31.5“ x 23.6“ x 3.9” (80cm x 60cm x 10cm) Weight: 27.6 lbs (12.5 kg) so pickup in person (or a rendezvous somewhere) is much preferred to shipping it. Cover included.
  20. Yes, you're right - extremely annoying. I have just paid Photobucket, stupidly, but no doubt it'll be impossible to link the photos anyway. Only just found the tiny Edit button, since Basschat changed their design too (and charged).
  21. I’m reluctantly selling my 1969 (or 1966, according to serial number research) Gibson EB-3, which someone before me has modified, substituting a DiMarzio Model 1 pickup in place of the Gibson ‘mudbucker’ and replacing the original bridge with a Schaller 2000-4 bridge. I do not have, and have never had, the original parts. The DiMarzio pickup is less boomy and muddy than the original, and the Schaller bridge allows for more adjustment than the original. As can be seen in the photos, there are many dings, dents and cracked lacquer in the original finish, but it sounds just like a 60s EB-3 should, particularly with the La Bella flatwound strings that are fitted. Like me, if you love Jack Bruce and Andy Fraser, this is the bass for you! A pristine ’60s EB-3 would go for £3,000-£4,000+, but this bass is for playing, not storing in a glass case! Sale only, no trades, sorry. [Edited now to show photos] Supplied with an old Hiscox case. Would prefer not to ship, unless unavoidable, depending on buyer’s location. Serial number: 806879 Scale length: 30 ½” Single string spacing at bridge: 17 mm Total string spacing at bridge: 52 mm
  22. Sandberg Basic Ken Taylor 5 £1100 including UK shipping Bought secondhand in April 2017 and has not been gigged since - home recording use only. I now have a 5-string Sandberg California VM to partner a 4-string California VM, so this bass, as good as it is, needs to be moved on. A lovely bass! Neck: Bolt-on Canadian hardrock maple Fretboard: 24 frets Scale: 864 mm/34" Body: mahogany and rarewood imbuia top Finish: matt Pickups: 2 Sandberg powerhumbucker - switched split coil on bridge pickup Preamp: Sandberg 3-band, active/passive Dunlop Straploks Neck width at nut: 1 ¾”/45mm String spacing at nut: 8mm String width at bridge: 2 ⅞”/73mm String spacing at bridge: 18mm Weight: 4.11kg/9.06lb Sandberg gig bag Very small ding on body below 23rd fret Photos: Sandberg Basic Ken Taylor 5 by Neil Murray, on Flickr Sandberg Basic Ken Taylor 5 by Neil Murray, on Flickr Sandberg Basic Ken Taylor 5 by Neil Murray, on Flickr Sandberg Basic Ken Taylor 5 by Neil Murray, on Flickr Sandberg Basic Ken Taylor 5 by Neil Murray, on Flickr Sandberg Basic Ken Taylor 5 by Neil Murray, on Flickr
×
×
  • Create New...