Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Glockenklang 2 band onboard pre amp


petetexas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

I thought as much , and have asked Glockenklang, and Thomann, without any reply from either .

Thanks for info, I feel a bit better getting one , and doing it now .

All I need is a Volume and Tone ( I know it will be a ganged pot with treb and bass for the tone ) but thats all I need SIMPLICITY ON STAGE !

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got 3 basses with Glock pre-amps and just checked the wiring diagram and it may be possible.

The blend circuit board is hard wired to the volume so a simple connection to the two wires going to the volume board should do it.

Edited by BassBunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ,

 

Had a reply from Thomann Tech ( who has been in touch with Glockenklang ) Yep , connect the + on the pup to 3 or 4 on the VOLUME pot , missing out the BALANCE control , and do not connect the MID pot .

 

Pete

Edited by petetexas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While awaiting the Glock , l have fitted a bass pentatone ( 6 position varitone ) to the Gibbo.........very confusing connection info on line for this unit l - have asked de lisle for clarification. 

The different notch filters give the Gibbo quite a range of sounds , but l seem to have a connection issue,  because l have lost the smoothness of my volume control !

Pete

Edited by petetexas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had reply from de lisle , l have somehow added an extra wire from volume pot to bass pentatone , hence the loss of volume smoothness (all effect at full turn) BUT , wired correctly as de lisle say , there is a large amount of volume lost as you go through the 6 positions , but the volume control works smoothly .

I'm going to leave it with the extra wire , as l prefer the smoother sound   , and less volume loss going through the positions .

I will post both sketches later today , maybe someone with electrical knowledge can explain?

Looks like the Glock will take a back seat for the time being .

Pete

Edited by petetexas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the two sketches of how the pentatone was wired .........

 

First one ( A ) correct to the instructions of de lisle..........vol pot works

 

Second one ( B ) My extra cable ( balanced more across the six positions ( still some slight loss in volume ))Vol pot does not work correctly .....

 

Pete

pentatone version A.jpg

pentatone version B.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the diagrams, 1 is correct (assuming the pentatone is wired like that), and 2 I am not sure how the volume is making any difference at all, other than working as a tone bypass a higher 'volumes'. 

There will be a loss of volume in some of the settings on the tone control, that is how a passive tone control works, it takes away more or less of the signal at different frequencies..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys ,

Used it Sunday at the gig , but as usual I kept switching to position 1 , then 3 , then 6 , then back to 3 etc etc etc just because they were there !..........too much messing about really .

What I will say is that the sounds were all pretty good , all the way around the 6 positions switch .

I might leave it on and try to improve the loss volume control , and settle on one sound .

Last gig for the band anyhow, so no hurry .

I`ll keep you posted

Pete

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...