Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

40hz

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 40hz

  1. I wouldn't be dropping £600 on a Rockbass (and I have one). Hold onto that cash and wait until a German Corvette comes up. Wonderful sounding instrument and would run rings round the Ibanez.

  2. [quote name='Painy' timestamp='1433079145' post='2787584']
    I think the reason that Adam Clayton's many and varied signature basses are so widely ridiculed is that none of them are what could actually be described as his signature model i.e. synonymous with the player in the way that say a black P with mirrored pickguard would be associated with Phil Lynott. His basses are signature models only in the sense that his signature is printed on them. It seems to be a case of whenever he happens to get a new bass then the manufacturer - whoever that may be - puts his name on the headstock to shift a few extra units at a premium regardless of whether he will ever actually be seen playing live or in the studio with it.

    Right, I'm of to scribble my name onto my Fender Jazz that I bought a few months ago despite having played Warwicks exclusively for the previous 10 years :)
    [/quote]

    Nailed it.

  3. I say it again. MiM since 2009ish onwards are a vastly superior instrument to the previous years (on the whole). I definitely think in my experience that the Mexican range should actually garner a bit more respect these days. Especially the roadworns.

  4. I think I've said before but both pickups on full, tone wide open and . . . BOOM! that's THE sound. Never had a problem with it sounding weak either. My Jazz sounds feckin' huge! I agree with Conan on the front pickup thing. It's not 'quite' the real thing, but IMO it's pretty darn close and in the context of a full band, even closer. I think I might be in the minority when it comes to the rear pickup however. I absolutely loathe the sound of it by itself, I dislike Jaco's tone intensely (or any other rear bias tone) but that is just my personal thing. I'm sure people hate both pickups on full. When it comes to the best example of the tone, the main man for that sound HAS to be Larry Graham. He for me, IS the Jazz bass tone. The punch and 'pop' to the notes, growl in spades, that is what it's all about!

  5. [quote name='jonnythenotes' timestamp='1428864073' post='2745449']
    Sometimes, the almost limitless pallet of sounds an active bass allows you to use works against you, in that you always feel there is a better sound somewhere else in there. It gives you a feeling of not being satisfied, or missing out on that elusive killer tone. With a passive, you are far more limited, and learn to make do, which forces you to create in a much more focused way. I have found after years of various active basses, I was relying on the bass to find me 'that sound', and sometimes I was lucky enough to drop on it...( this with ref to all venues need a different sound, and no setting suits all.) A few weeks ago I blew the cobwebs of a Yamaha BB 2024 after giving up on it as being inferior to my active Mike Lull. After a half hour or so, I began listening to the bass, instead of what was missing compared to the active sound, and I realised I was hearing a much more 'real' and open sound rather than that almost overworked and hyper sensitive sound I was used to from actives. Perhaps my perception has always been (without knowing it) that active basses had to be better because they had 'more' of everything. I have now deliberately painted myself into a corner, and have chosen to limit myself by using my passive again, and the difference is little short of amazing. I feel I am far more responsible for how it sounds, rather than a part owner of it. There is far more to active or passive than just the bass itself... It's far more about what's in your head than in the bass itself.
    [/quote]

    Interesting stuff, well said mate.

×
×
  • Create New...