Sibob

7 hours ago, Bagman said:

The SGFX Diamond Bass Comp EQ is the mutts nuts

 

the original BCP-1 also excellent 

I didn’t get to try the SGFX version, I had tried this Jnr and liked it, and didn’t want to then buy the SGFX if it didn’t have what I liked about the Jnr. But we’ll see how it goes!

Si

12 hours ago, Paddy777 said:

I really fancy trying the Diamond Bass comp - what you reckon to it? 

I really like it (as you’d expect), it’s way more characterful than the MXR (which is either a good thing or a bad thing for you haha). The MXR is very transparent, which is great of course, but a different result to what I want in this case, which is wanting to thicken things up and add some ‘magic’ while also taming some heavy pick playing.

Si

There’s a number of caveats, but for a quick response, I’d put the MXR Octave back on the small board and run with that setup. The Stomp is extremely capable of copping all the sounds you might need. 

Additionally, I’d be more inclined to dump the DCX (I wasn’t impressed with either side of it) and utilize the Wren & Cuff Fuzz instead. 

But yeah, kinda largely depends on your type of music/gigs etc.

Si
 

A couple of little changes thanks to @tayste_2000:

Swapped out my 3Leaf Enabler for the Shiftline Olympic MkIIIs on the Nano, powered by a Cioks Sol, running the Olympic and OC2 at 12v:

Swapped out my MXR Studio Compressor for the Diamond Bass Comp Jnr on the Nano+, powered by a Cioks DC5, running the Diamond at 18v:

That is all for now 😀

Si

Excellent condition (pedal almost ‘as new’, box is a little more beaten) MXR Studio Comp.

This is famously EXACTLY the same circuit as the MXR Bass Comp, but with a different enclosure. MXR did this to sell it more effectively to the guitar market. To be fair, I think it looks smarter than the Bass Comp.

This is MXR’s take on an 1176 comp I believe. Not much else to say, solid pedal, nice transparent sound, effective compression. Cool.

£120 inc UK postage.

No trades unless you have a Guild Starfire II in ‘Natural’ or a Sire P5R 5 string in white (+money your way of course 😅).

Cheers

Si

On 12/06/2025 at 12:15, LukeFRC said:

what does it need?

24v, 1.25 mA

And this connector:

Si

On 28/09/2023 at 11:28, BassAdder60 said:

I’ve experimented with many common effects pedals such as drive, compression, chorus etc and I seem to always come back to a simple straight into a good amp approach!!

 

I love the clean tone of a PBass and find it just works without really needing much else and I’ve gone round in circles trying out pedals and finding they don’t improve what really doesn’t need improving !

 

The only pedals I have on my board now are my Shure GLXD16+ receiver / tuner and my Genzler drive channel footswitch for the Magellan 800

 

Im thinking I should downsize my board too as it’s a Metro 20 and the two items look a little lost on a 20” board !

If that’s all you need for your musical output, awesome!

You could just use one of the Pedaltrain pedal risers, the PB2, which seems to fit the Shure and the switch (if the internet is correct in telling me the 1590G Hammond enclosure is a good size for a placeholder image). I’m assuming the switch is passive, and so no space needed for power as you’re likely just plugging the Shure in directly to the wall:

Si

I have one of these and they really are excellent!

Si

Great colour!

GLWTS.

Si

2 hours ago, Jakester said:

 

So, played them for a good few hours at rehearsal yesterday, and I'm warming to them. The slight stickiness went pretty quickly and once I was actually up and playing with others, they felt fine - as @Sibob says, like a well-played in roundwound. The sound was great, though - from sounding really toppy and bright at home, they fit really well into an ensemble context, with a really strong fundamental tone. 

 

I'll be sticking with them for now (not least because of the price!) but I'd say they managed to improve on rather mixed first impressions. 

 

 

That stickiness, according to IMA, is apparently some residue from the windings that has made its way onto  the strings, having been coiled in a pack. As you say, mine also lost the tackiness after a bit of playing in. Wasn’t present at all for my gig and I had a great time.

No bother at all.

Si

I have some on my Lakland 44-PJ. I mirror the experience of them really not being what I was expecting, as others have mentioned, way more 'roundwound' in feel than they're perhaps  marketed as. That said, for me, the texture wasn't really a make or break.....I mean as long as they don't shred your fingers right?! I would put them on par with a Nickel string, roundwound, but easy to play. My undertstanding is that IMA requested a little more left on the string than their Super Polished....so that makes sense.

Tension wise, I experience them more in the realms of the La Bella RX Nickels than their RX Steels, with the latter being a little too stiff for my liking. I wonder whether the polishing process takes a little stiffness out of the string, which is perfect for my preferences.

Sound wise I didn't experience them as zingy at all, I thought they were like nice played-in rounds, kinda like a slightly aged nickel (IME steels don't age as well as nickels).
So I gigged them and they were great, really enjoyable to play.

My main criteria was longevity, so we'll see where get to on that, IMA reckons he got a solid year out of one set, and he gigs WAY more than me....so I'm hopeful.

Watch this space.

Si 

30 minutes ago, MarkBuffaloStokes said:

Location may help!

Good spot, added.

Thanks

As-new Shergold Telstar shortscale bass in Champagne Gold finish.
 

Wonderful bass, plays and sounds fantastic, but with a couple of bills to pay, and a number of other excellent instruments, I need to downsize a little, last in, first out unfortunately.

Roasted maple neck on these too, which is a nice feature!

Comes with a very simple gig-bag/cover. It’s not suitable for shipping in, so collection or meet-up in/near High Wycombe, Bucks on this one.

£285

Trade wise, I’m after a Sire P5R 5 string, preferably in white. Probably with a few quid your way. 
Also looking for a Guild Starfire II in 'Natural' (the dark wood finish), with money your way of course.

Cheers

Si

10 hours ago, SimonK said:

...so what happened today???

Really great clinic IMO, they’re kinda the bass duo that I didn’t know I needed, polar opposites in some respects and that plays off against one another very well. They’re also very similar in many respects, so it was interesting to see that come out. 
 

I’m glad that it didn’t just turn into a HX Stomp ‘how to’, it was essentially one big Q&A from the start, and there were some great conversation and playing as a result. 

It was a little over 2 hours, but could quite easily have been longer….but a big band needed the room to sound check haha. 
 

10/10 would watch again!

Si

On 26/05/2025 at 15:33, kwmlondon said:

Sorry. I’m rubbish with names. I actually saw Martin Cathy play at the tribute concert to Bert Jansch. It was just one of those stories I heard mentioned once and I’m really glad that it wasn’t that Paul Simon who stole credit for someone else’s work. Thanks for sharing 

Carthy!

🤣

Sounds like this might go down a similar path to Tecamp/Eich (which has seemingly worked out well for Thomas).

I’ve only ever had one interaction with Phil, at NAMM a few years ago, and he was lovely. Hope he finds a positive way forward!

Si

Threads merged.

Si

3 minutes ago, Killerfridge said:

But we aren't taking about a capture here, but a traditional model such as you would get on an HXStomp or plugin i.e. it has all the expected controls of an SVT (bass, mid, mid selection, treble, ultra low switch, ultra high switch) except gain, and apparently has infinite headroom (within digital limits). It just seems like a bit of a weird design choice not being able to make the amps break up in any way beside digital clipping

Oh sorry, I misunderstood then. Yeah I’d expect a dynamic amp effect to break-up in the standard way. If it doesn’t, that is somewhat odd.

Si

On 20/05/2025 at 16:59, bassmayhem said:

The use of an overdrive in front of the amp block is what make it break up. I don't drive that too hard, just to get some hair on the tone. It sounds very good; not at all that harsh or "crackled" than many other modelers sound when raising the gain on the amp block. It makes it for me, anyhow. I sold the Quad Cortex, I sold the Helix, I sold the HX Stomp XL. This one sounds so much better to my ears. Not at all as competent as QC, but I prefer tone and simplicity.

 

I’m not sure I quite understand your first sentence?! In that case, you’re not making the amp break-up, you’re just introducing a drive circuit before it, which is then being amplified. 
The test would be putting a significant clean boost in front of the amp capture, and seeing if that drives it.

With no horse in the race, I too would not expect an amp capture to break-up, as it doesn’t have the information to do that in the same way a dynamic, controllable effect does, it’s just a snapshot of a single sound. I’d probably expect digital clipping (bad) before you achieved anything useable. But happy to be proven wrong of course.

Si

Yup, ex-Bass Worlder here, but no recollection as to how long that was for. Joined BC on 30th May 2007 it seems! 
 

Si

I’ve PM’d you @AJC08

Si

20 minutes ago, Obra said:

 

This is a pedalboard...some pedals connected one to another. 

I'm going crazy from digital processos being called pedalboards.

They’re called pedals because you operate them with your foot. All of the setups you have replied to are footswitch operated by the guitarist/bassist in order to achieve different tones. Colloquially, they are all pedals on boards, hence pedalboards.

Move on.

Si

I’ve used my Markbass LM2’s with a Barefaced Super Compact (plus a G2 Midget sometimes) for years now, my fave amp combo ever, and I’ve experimented with a whole bunch.

So if you have the budget, one of their Super Minis would definitely do the job (and then some).

https://barefacedaudio.com/products/super-midget

Si

I’ll stick with La Bella 760FL’s at half the price!

Si

I suspect there will be losses for some customers as their operating costs would have been partly funded by ticket sales….so will have been partly spent I expect.

This is what I mean, they’re not coming back from this, next year won’t happen, either because they won’t bother, or even less people will engage with it and it will be cancelled again. 
 

Which is a shame.

Si