Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

itu

Member
  • Posts

    3,290
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by itu

  1. 4 hours ago, geoham said:

    Can we infer anything about the quality or (dare I say!) tone of wood from its weight?

    Yes. Sadowsky is no good because it is light.

     

    I think the weight thing is so popular, because people haven't any other tools to discuss about the reasons some instrument feels or sounds good. How about the wood structure, shapes of the instrument, components... these already include details that are not possible to reduce to one simple number, like weight.

  2. 10 hours ago, rmorris said:

    Worth looking here (legacy site)

    http://www.audereengineering.com/TechDetails.htm

    Yes. You can make trial of this impedance change by using let's say a megaohm vol pot and putting different resistors (1 M, 500k, 200k and so on) in parallel with it. This way the pickup sees the vol as a 1 Mohm pot or less.

     

    You have here an LR-circuit. The pickup represents L (inductance) and the pot is a Resistor. Naturally the impedance will change, this is very bassic electronics.

  3. Once more the bass signal chain:

     

    pickups - blend - vol - tone stack - output

     

    If all parts of the chain here are working without a power supply (usually a battery), this circuit is high impedance, a.k.a. passive.

     

    If any part of the signal chain has a power supply, the system output impedance becomes low, a.k.a. active.

     

    Low impedance output is easier than hi-Z to any amp input. If anyone has had issues with piezos (very high impedance), understands this. You know the thin sound that lacks bass. A quality preamp might help.

     

    If your amp has issues with the poor bass response, a preamp (or pickups, or active blend or...) may help. The output impedance can be tweaked with the circuitry somewhat, but the main point is that low impedance lets the whole frequency band out.

     

    Every component, and especially high impedance component in the signal chain affect the pickup response, usually by reducing it. This means that replacing any passive component with a lo-Z one will widen the response. Even the blend and volume pots, which are usually left alone while only the tone stack is replaced. If you still read this, take a look at the signal chain: both pots are right after the pickups - and reduce the freq response!

     

    As all things have two sides, many effects behave differently if the signal is hi-Z, or lo-Z. I have tried far too many OD/fuzz/dist pedals, as well as compressors, to find out that some pedals just work and sound better with different signal types. Make lots of trials and find this out by yourself.

  4. 5 hours ago, Jimothey said:

    Thinking about the Grind you could make it look like a modern looking jazz bass...

    Do we have too few jazzes around, if that Grind has to be returned to that shape? I have to say that the bass makes me think of pushing that shape even further away from basic J.

     

    But of course this is about taste, which is simply personal.

  5. 6 hours ago, Bill Fitzmaurice said:

    I have no idea. It's not like Alex to create terms of out thin air. I'd ask him.

    Exactly. Clean does not mean a thing. Distortion is there, the amount is just not specified.

     

    Watts (RMS, 8 ohm) is a common (comparable) way of explaining the output power of an amp, or the input power of the cab. This may include distortion at certain level, like 1 %. It is meaningful to understand that bass can withstand up to around 10 % of distortion (nothing to do with the effect), and still sound decent.

     

    Remember: watts is about electrical power, not loudness, although they are faintly connected.

     

    Peak levels are funny, because they are so high, and people think that they represent something like ultimate loudness. Which is not true.

     

    If we have numbers like output and input watts, they do not represent loudness levels. dB can describe loudness, but calculating loudness from plain watts - no chance. We need more parameters.

     

    Cabs and amps can produce more or less sound. Watts, sensitivity... Before you certainly know the output level, you have to test the rig, or get lots of data and calculate. The question about the power levels, and their mismatch is mostly academic: it is very seldom the amp is fried if the load is more than 4 ohms. It is rare you can fry a cab if the powers and signals are at somewhat sensible level. I do not say it is impossible. Users can act erroneously, but hopefully this community can help those before any damage will happen.

  6. Red one to signal, black to ground. Remove the tone pot. 

     

    The basic idea is that different resistors and capacitors direct certain part of the signal away from the output. As there are only two places possible (out and gnd) the highs go to gnd. The amount is dependent on the values of the components.

  7. 3 hours ago, Lfalex v1.1 said:

    ...Vigier Series III, which, whilst not being balanced adhere to the 600 ohm standard.

    I see, you mean XLR-based lo-Z outputs. Yes, balanced is one speciality, and directed to studio people.

  8. 31 minutes ago, Lfalex v1.1 said:

    Active pickups are another story again, as are low-impedance outputs.

    What do you mean here with the term "low-impedance outputs"?

    Lo-Z output is any bass with any battery powered unit in the signal chain, like active blend or boosting tone stack.

  9. pickups - blend - vol - tone stack - output

     

    Show me the bass which has a fully "active" signal chain, please. If the blend and the vol are plain pots, only the tone stack is battery operated. (Yes, I am excluding those buffered EMGs and few other specialities.)

     

    I wish the word "active" would have another word beside it which would separate hi-Z adjustments + battery tone stacks from true mixers (like some EMGs and John East stuff). Mixer would be fine but because so many people do not understand the difference, thus mixer will not be a widely used term.

     

    I do see that the tone stack itself can be the issue (and is easily replaceable), just like the poor blend+vol stack (which is maybe worth £2). Take a look inside a studio mixer channel, and think why it probably has better sound than your "active" preamp that is worth £10. And I do not mean the price at the dealers. I mean the price of the components and the PCB.

     

    You want to compare something, take a good hi-Z set (like @KiOgon) and try the same bass with a mixer (like East), then this discussion has a better start. Cheap tone stacks are just, yes, cheapo.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...