Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
Scammer alert: Offsite email MO. Click here to read more. ×

itu

Member
  • Posts

    4,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by itu

  1. One point of view seems to be missing when people talk about gone instruments/amps/etc. and that's nostalgia. Many want to have their youth equipment back. Yes, I paid £400 for a '76 black 4001 from Denmark street in 1986. Now the price would be close to ridiculous. It wasn't that good.

     

    Of many instruments I've played I wanted to buy a Vigier Passion. Now I have one and I am very pleased with it. But a Ric? Please no, why bother?

     

    If I wanted a good instrument now, I might turn to some luthier ("Dear Overwater..."), or buy some hand made instrument from Eastern Europe (Czech, Poland...). It would be a small investment, but nothing like a Fodera, or a severely beaten Nash. The quality and the price would certainly be very good compared to a Jazz from 70's. Retro is for someone else.

    • Like 1
  2. tc electronic Triple C, a 3 band comp, available as single channel model. I tried it, but as a rack unit is bulky, moved to HyperGravity.

     

    Presonus Blue Max, a half rack unit with presets, and fully manual unit. Comp16 is even smaller model, similar to Alesis nano comp (9 VAC in!).

     

    Somewhere around here is a Canadian guy, who miniatyrized dbx's Over Easy comp. It is slightly larger than a pot. You can install it to your bass. Very interesting unit.

    • Like 1
  3. Why not (is this happening)?

     

    requirements

    - independent body (or some very enthusiastic person like ovnilab.com) making tests

    - (big enough) anechoic room or OATS

    - test equipment

     * noise generator

     * measurement mic

     * audio analyzer

    - regular calibration of equipment

    - lots of cabs

    - lots of amps

     

    We want independent tests that we could compare, but who will pay the bill? Besides, if any fanboy likes Ampeg-Boogie, BugEra, Mercedes-Benzio, or anything else, something was wrong with the test setup. Or the tests do not tell facts (that the fanboy does not like other voicings).

     

    I have been sitting in a few anechoic chambers (also in one meant for radio testing), and they cost a lot. That's why outdoor testing would be a feasible option. If the results could be pretty good, and comparable instead of laboratory grade, some cheaper equipment could be OK. But again, last - and definitely not least - would be the numerous EUTs.

     

    Do some tests today, and you have to repeat them every time a company modifies a unit. This also is most probably the main reason companies do not publish their results: they are expensive. They are the key to the recipies of their tone.

  4. 3 hours ago, BassApprentice said:

    Some cool paint designs which I guess separates them from others.

    Coming up 2025-2125: A new Paintera collection every year!

     

    Reverb ad 2050:

    A rare Paintera available, 100 000 made, but only 50 in this particular colour.

  5. On 12/01/2024 at 03:42, tauzero said:

    They add length if you leave the strap on. If you take it off, they might add a millimetre or two.

    I think there's even a song: You can leave your strap on. But is the case in discussion hard or soft?

     

    Seriously, all my basses have strap locks, and they all work well (Schaller, Dunlop). I check them yearly, because every screw tends to loosen over time.

  6. 15 hours ago, chyc said:

    Presumably in the same way that you can technically plug some speakers directly into line-out as it's all electromagnetic waves. The preamps are designed for different levels of gain and impedence. I've plugged in an ultra-high impedance pickup into a mere high-impedance amplifier. Did it make sound? Yeah, I guess. Did it sound great? No, not so much.

     

    You also need to deal with the fact that active-pickup-preamps, when they have a bypass, still supply come kind of active circuitry to buffer the pickups. My Warwick for example has active MEC pickups, with a preamp bypass switch, yet when the battery is removed the bass doesn't function at all, even when preamp bypass is engaged.

    Signal levels from the power amp, and line level are decades away from each other. Not comparable.

     

    But pickup outputs are not so very different, or the amp inputs should be very different. We already know that hi-Z pickups may be higher in output than lo-Z ones, but the ballpark is the same. The impedance (Z) can vary more.

     

    If the pickup has some non-bypassable circuitry, it still does not affect the functionality of a (battery powered) preamp, does it? No battery, no sound, this is obvious. Bypassing a bass' pre then gives the sound of the pickups, no?

     

    If we look at the system, it looks like this:

    pickup (hi-Z) - tone stack - output

    OR

    pickup (hi-Z) - buffer (lo-Z) - tone stack - output

     

    The first option's output is hi-Z, if the tone stack is hi-Z. If the stack is battery powered, output is lo-Z.

    (The output impedance can be tweaked with certain choices in the preamp.)

     

    A buffer can, and pretty often is, a voltage follower, i.e. the voltage stays the same, only the output impedance will be lower. EMG uses lower winding in the coils, so the circuitry amplifies the signal slightly. Then the output is in the same ballpark, as its hi-Z siblings.

     

    The battery powered tone stack has buffers - usually a few - by nature. Now we add one more from the pickup, how are the preamp choices reduced?

     

    This is how I understand bass' electronics. But true, it is quite some time from the university lectures.

  7. Switching the battery on and off while the bass is connected to an amp is likely to pop loudly.

     

    Consider finding a double pot for the bass and treble (or make a tilt eq from them) and you dont have to drill more holes.

     

    I soldered a push switch to my former Modulus Graphite, but put it under the back cover. If a battery was empty, the instrument cable fit the small hole to push the override switch. Then I put the cable back to the amp, and continued. No pops, just funk.

    • Like 1
  8. 5 hours ago, chyc said:

    ... I believe the confusion stems from the fact that you can pair an active preamp with passive pickups, as with the Sandberg you own. For active pickups, you need an active preamp, but one specifically designed for such a scenario...

    How is this true?

     

    The difference between low impedance (lo-Z), and hi-Z ("passive") pickups is the impedance. If this was the thing that separates preamps from each other, what's the Z that divides the models?

     

    Yes, there are very high Z input transducer preamps, like those built for piezos. But as battery powered EMG pickups and others alike are very lo-Z, they actually fit better to any preamp.

     

    I do not see any reason why an EMG pickup wouldn't work with a John East, or any other preamp. Just like they work with your or my amp's input.

  9. Very rough idea of the strings:

    - flats have that short, flat sound, and they last and last...

    - groundwounds/halfrounds are slightly sharper in sound, but still close to flats

    - nickel is good for a fretless, too, and their response is more even than ->

    - stainless steel (SS) has a sound that reminds the smiley eq curve when new, thin sets are for slapping twangmen

     

    Material choices are only few (steel, coated steel, and polymers) despite marketing people tend to disagree. Gauges vary a lot, and may mean a lot in playability, as well as how the bass sounds and interacts.

×
×
  • Create New...