rmorris
-
Posts
1,308 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Posts posted by rmorris
-
-
Putting out a feeler for a Zoom B9.1ut. for sale. Bought this on here some years ago and now wanting to move it on. It's a great "Bass Control Centre" with excellent connectivity - check it online if not familiar.
It does have a loose power connection (as when bought) and needs a bit of jiggling and BluTak etc to fix in place. Comes with a substitute 12V psu (as bought). Might benefit from a quieter supply but YMMV. Apart from that all controls / pots / connections etc seem good.
Manual etc available online and there's a good PC editor program I got from the Zoom website. I can supply if it's dropped off there. Posting this would be a hassle - it's def on the large / solid side, so price is for collection from Brighton or Littlehampton (Home / Work) although delivery / meet up could be possible in the Sussex region. Just ask me if interested. Will do photos if interest shown. Would prefer to move it on here rather than Ebay etc.
-
OTOH - inexpensive and sounds really good:
Active with transformer output.
Note - don't confuse with their Ultra-DI D120 box - it's a noise machine !!!
-
On 16/08/2025 at 11:16, bobbass4k said:
Not that it helps you much, but if you want the explanation, it's two fold - CPC are just selling at a lower margin, different customer base, different pricing structures. But also CPC has older, lower cost stock, so their sell price is lower. Farnell sell a lot more of this part so the physical stock we have is newer and there's been a price increase. When CPC exhaust that stock their price will go up.
You are clearly more "in the know" wrt the specifics of CPC - but yes that's how things generally work commercially.
Additionally, the technical documentation from CPC esp wrt some of the products that appear exclusive to them is scant. eg look at connectors and cables etc.
Datasheet info maybe scant - eg for a twisted pair you are unlikely to see the lay length or screen detail eg lapped / Reussen / braid etc.
Service is reliable though and I order from them. And fwiw my (very corporate) employer uses both Farnell and CPC.
-
9 hours ago, PaulThePlug said:
Just leave it! The body won't mind...
Exactly. Look at it as "Surface Chambering / Weight Relief) 😊 And if you, or anyone, wishes to put a pickup back in there then it's a plus.
-
That's about right. The regulations around debit vs credit cards differ and also related to amount. But yeah - never leave cash with a dealer before you have the goods in your hands.
-
Given the physics / mechanics of a fretted stringed instrument - intonation is always a thing that may need to be evened out - ie splitting the difference - depending on sensitivity. fret placement / crowning is a thing but so is string tension / gauge (go lighter but raising action counteracts benefit) and and action.
-
1
-
-
On 10/06/2025 at 16:15, jimfist said:
Modeling & profiling have come a long way in the last 15 years. It is hard to imagine a device like the GP-5 being able to do what it does in such a small pedal at a very low cost, albeit at what I'd consider to be sub-par technical current standards as would be required by today's professionals (AD/DA conversion and latency, primarily).
Be that as it may, the GP-5 proves it can be done on the cheap and is absolutely fine for applications that may not be critical.
Is that a guess around the latency ADC/DAC etc or do you know the specs' / performance ?
I'm aware that the NAM implementation is compromised from the maximum but not yet clear in what way.
-
On 28/01/2025 at 21:26, Earbrass said:
OK, I finally got a very apologetic reply, so I am somewhat mollified, especially as I realize it was at least in part my fault for not reading all the FAQs before purchasing!
I'm looking at this plugin now. tbh it shouldn't be necessary to trawl through all the FAQ to find out something like this.
-
1
-
-
On 29/05/2025 at 16:10, Quatschmacher said:
Really looks desolate now:
It was going well then. Bin strike not really relevant. fwiw the corner door in view there wasn't used as an entrance. The immediate area is quite lively as it happens. Street bric a brave etc market on the street to the left today with a street band entertaining the customers outside the Dorset bar opposite. And Kensington Gardens predictably busy on a Saturday especially during the festival
-
20 hours ago, torby said:
When I type gak.co.uk into my browser, it takes me to gear4music.
G4M have bought GAK stock / website / data from the administrators. Not planning to trade under the GAK brand identity.
-
11 hours ago, BassBiscuit said:
Now 'Gear4music' aren't they...?
Studiospares went into liquidation. Gear4Music have subsequently picked up the brand, IP , assets etc. Offering a range of products from Studio spares own / proprietary brands. Maybe more to follow. But at present a far cry from the previous 'full range" offering of music / studio kit. Seems they picked it up for around £150k.
Nearest outfit to the old Studiospares is Canford Audio. But they operate only on a B2B basis.
-
43 minutes ago, Wombat said:
You sure you meant walk?
I see what you did there 🤣 Naughty 😳
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Steve Browning said:
It really is a shame that such a place has gone (and with Bax too). Brighton still has some interesting music shops to look at. In some ways they are more precious than GAK. The remaining places are more like old school shops, with some eclectic (and s/h) gear in them.
Yes. But beyond our bass centric world - GAK went beyond the bass / guitar / amp area. More full range with drums / studio / keys etc. Nearest thing now for UK may be Gear4Music. Thomann in Germany obvs. Not a new thing though - on the studio side anyone remember Thatched Cottage Audio ? And more recently the demise of Studiospares?
-
2
-
-
Back to GAK - just been past. Stock shifted and Shop to Let signs up.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, prowla said:
Not from my perspective; that’s cherry picking.
The assertion of “Personally I don't buy the risk taking argument.” wasn’t specifically constrained as far as I can see.
Tax is just one aspect.The point is surely to encompass all of the factors pertaining to running a business.
The context seemed clear to me but since that comment was going against my recognition of the risk aspect then you'd need to ask the poster about what exactly was meant.
As for "encompassing all of the factors..." - how would you propose to approach that ? (outside of the tax regime )
-
7 minutes ago, Burns-bass said:
It’s interesting where simply being bad at business or investing in a dying operational model mutates into wilful corporate malfeasance.Very much so. Malfeasance is another level as I see it. What I more often see is a business that is maybe going along okay but not stellar being acquired with the aim of pushing / expanding it hugely.
It's risky, it fails. Employees lose their jobs and the future opportunities along with them. The company owners can afford the loss and that loss is minimised by use of company structures and (legal) accounting practices.
7 minutes ago, Burns-bass said:I don’t know enough about GAK to be honest, but the majority of failed businesses I’ve known aren’t through design, but circumstance.
Yes. Though a not insignificant number of "bad apples' eh "Phoenix companies".
Maybe I've spent too long in / around small scale businesses where the "bosses" have been more interested in their next car 🤔
7 minutes ago, Burns-bass said:If also say HMRC are, for the most part fantastic and fair. I had a problem and they sorted it, offered advice and enforced no penalties.
That's interesting. I've also found HMRC okay (fingers crossed as I'm waiting to hear back from them on something atm)
But I know someone where it has been awful trying to get something personal resolved.
I believe there has been a significant degree of loss of experienced senior staff over time. Pay restraint and high offers from financial businesses drawing them away. Although many then not happy with the pressure piled on them.
7 minutes ago, Burns-bass said:The systems we have aren’t perfect and can be abused (VAT is a classic one that open to abuse) but we have to deal with what we have.
-
6 minutes ago, prowla said:
That's a very blinkered point of view.
The risk is any exposure to which a PAYE employee wouldn't be party to and certainly isn't constrained to just investment and tax.
Of course, someone focused solely on tax would be dismissive of the other risks inherent in running a business.
And they're only interested in their deemed share of the profits; the risk of losses is none of their concern.
No. Whilst there may be numerous risks in business, the relevant risk wrt taxation status (which is the area under discussion here wrt difference in tax / NI rates PAYE vs Dividend Income) IS the investment risk and whether it justified being taxed at a different rate.
In many cases it's not a problem tbh but it can be subject to abuse.
-
2 hours ago, Burns-bass said:
will pay pretty much the same tax as PAYE employees (with no holiday pay, sick pay or other associated benefits).GAK is more likely to have been the victim of changing circumstance bit corporate malfeasance, but we can’t say for sure.
The benefits thing is tired tbh. Of course owners / self employed don't get company paid benefits as they would simply be paying themselves. There is an argument around state paid benefits, esp SSP but it's fairly marginal. Holiday / Sickness Pay considerations etc need to be rolled into renumeration taken. It's why you pay a trade a multiple of the "?wage" itself.
Paid Directors are subject to PAYE and any contractual terms between them and the limited company. Of course, depending on the circumstances, this may be a zero sum gain.
Where it gets "interesting" is with multiple directors who are also shareholders and where there is disagreement on finance / policy / direction etc. Cause of many a company break up and bad feeling. Like being in a band 🤣
As for GAK specifically - I'd say - picked up by a notorious businessman for a punt. Aim to push further into online. Focus on high margin items judging from emails. When all incomes are under increasing cost pressure. Large physical shop in high retail value area. High staff costs. Accountants inform them it was no longer a viable operation so immediate lock up and nonsensical "Refurbishment" notice slapped on a door ?
-
2 hours ago, Steve Browning said:
Depends on your views on tax avoidance. Personally I don't buy the risk taking argument.
Like all avoidance, it's perfectly legal.
The risk taking argument really only applies to what in realistic terms can be judged to be real investment risk.
Where it is being used as a vehicle to subsidise unrealistically low PAYE income then, yes, it's avoidance ( unless HMRC / Courts find it to be evasion).
-
38 minutes ago, prowla said:
Is that good or bad?
Depends on the specific circumstances. There is an element of encouraging risk taking. But it can be abused in terms of trading realistic salary income for dividend income to artificially reduce income tax. It can, of course, backfire. Remember the outcry when people who paid themselves largely through dividends were not eligible for furlough support etc during COVID-19 restrictions.
-
44 minutes ago, WalMan said:
Only that they were not taking everything out, which is of course their right in a private company, as might happen in other circumstances. That said there were no profits to take anyway, but there was a couple of mil in reserves IIRC
There will be creditors. To withdraw assets / reserves from a company in such circumstances would be illegal.
-
7 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:
If it's a private limited company the Directors own the shares, and they are not publicly traded.
In general yes. But there is no statutory requirement for a director to be a shareholder or vice-versa. Although it might be a requirement set by the company itself.
I'm very aware that "dodgy accounting" is a thing. But legally dividends must be paid only from available profits which limits scope. OTOH there are Directors Loans as a financial vehicle...
-
On 09/04/2025 at 17:34, WalMan said:
4, and there were no dividends paid so they weren't stripping it that way
Not understanding that remark. Dividends are paid to shareholders in a company. Who may, or may not be, Directors (as in Officers of the Company).
-
1 hour ago, Iheartreverb said:
This couldn’t be more wrong.Fender and Gibson both sell direct to retailers rather than going through a third party distributor in the middle, some other brands do.
While it might be good for you for your local shop to offer top brands, the brand importantly have to concern themselves with how someone like that will represent their brand, there’s dealership requirements in place for a reason.
As an example, Two dusty Mexican P Basses in the corner doesn’t represent the Fender well. A bigger store with good examples at every part of the hierarchy and a wealth of colour options does. It also is a much better customer experience, you’re split for choice and more likely to buy into the brand.
I don’t think you’re going to agree and I’m trying to not be ones sided but the above is sorely under considered when people are favouring small, local stores.
Get what you are saying. But that retail model seems to not be working out well atm ? wrt GAK specifically I sensed a significant bias towards pushing the expensive kit. In the current general economic climate and the difficulties of semi/pro musicians earning significant money then I can't say I'm shocked that the shutters have gone up.
FireWire PCI card
in Recycling
Posted
PCI FireWire card. This has the chip set that works with audio interfaces (some firewire ports that came with PCs don't work with interfaces. Hence why I got this). Free + postage at cost. Or collect in Brighton.