Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Basses With Thin Fast Necks?


Ant_On_Bass
 Share

Recommended Posts

[quote name='dave_bass5' timestamp='1361782740' post='1990586']
Its not, there have already been a few posts discussing what fast means :rolleyes:
[/quote]

Yes. Thank you for the sarcasm, but I realise that. :rolleyes:

I was hoping that one of the people who [b]do[/b] equate fast and thin might post, explaining [i]why[/i] they made that link...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Conan' timestamp='1361788974' post='1990687']
I was hoping that one of the people who [b]do[/b] equate fast and thin might post, explaining [i]why[/i] they made that link...
[/quote]
For me, it's more than neck dimensions - string compliance and tension, action and scale length play an important role. I find that slender and shallow necks (with low action etc.) provide less in terms of 'hampering' what I want to do - I can play more quickly (and more expressively) when I don't feel that the bass is providing physical obstacles. I get the obstacle-free feel with slender necks and play short-scale, super-narrow basses almost exclusively now. All this said, there are occassions when a slightly more chunky neck works better for me (particularly in blues and rock settings) - getting slowed-down a bit frequently adds something rather than subtracing. I'm not sure this makes any sense...

Edited by lozbass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get that slim=fast either. It's surely how it fits your hand.

Maybe it's psychological - because it's thin like a greyhound you expect it to go faster than were it fat like a St Bernards.

(not taking the piss, for once, never underestimate the power of placebo)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='bremen' timestamp='1361805809' post='1991136']
I don't get that slim=fast either. It's surely how it fits your hand.
[/quote]

And maybe the neck finish? I find that highly glossed necks are a bit "grippy" and that unvarnished necks just don't feel right to me. My GL is "just right" as baby bear would say! Not sure what the finish actually [i]is[/i] (polyurethane rings a bell) but it is lovely IMO and makes the neck on that bass "feel" faster (i.e. comfortable and unrestrictive to play).

It is a very inexact science. I think we all know what [b][i]we[/i][/b] mean, but maybe find the terminology used by others more difficult to grasp!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

still haven't found out what makes a comfortable neck for me... I would love if some day I could buy a bass purely based on it's data (nut width, shallow or not so much etc.) but that day will probably never come. One thing I have learned is, that a proper setup and good strings can really work wonders, and sometimes turn an unplayable bass/neck completely around. The other thing I've learned is that string spacing is extremely important for me... 19 mm. is juuuuust right.

Best/fastest necks I've encountered so far:

Elrick Gold NJS 5 String
Tune 5 string (don't recall the model... It's almost 20 years ago)
Warwick Dolphin NT 5

Still long for an Elrick, and if I see one on the market sometime, at a reasonable price I will fight you for it ;).

Had a few 4/6 stringers with good necks, but comparing them to the 5's would be unreasonable... 5 Strings is definately my main instrument, although I would like a 4 string 'slapper' at some point :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...