Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

funkle

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,762
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by funkle

  1. 7 hours ago, PaulThePlug said:

    ^ I'm sure it will cover up OK with a bit of cut down rear pick guard - cheapy of aliexpress... or is the bridge P reverse

    Pics?


    I’ll start a new thread and post a video when I’ve actually got the new bass up and going. It’s still being worked on. 
     

    Both pickups will be reversed compared  to the normal orientation. The EA coil on each will be centred on where 60’s Jazz Bass positions are, and the DG coils will be north of that in each. Like this bass - https://www.talkbass.com/threads/nbd-double-reverse-p.1143531/

     

    It will be on a Jazz body like the Fender Blacktop Jazz basses. 

     

     

    • Like 2
  2. I’m busy having another go at a Dual Precision pickup bass. My first attempt eventually foundered because I put the rear pickup too close to the bridge. 
     

    I went throughs lot of the same agonies over pickup choice as the OP even then. Great to see this thread now, I think the advice is spot on.  
     

    I have a Fender CS 62 in my ‘flats’ bass now. Because my new project needs two pickups and that could get expensive for the top name stuff, and I like the CS 62, I went for two Tonerider Precision pickups. The rumour is they are quite similar to the CS 62 I have. It’s good to see that opinion in this thread too. I can only hope!

    • Like 1
  3. Howdy howdy all

     

    Picked this up as it was an unusual one, and I've had a fascination with dual Precision pickup basses, including building my own.

     

    Unfortunately I need cash for another hare-brained project, so it's time to trim the herd down a bit, and this was the most recent acquisition.

     

    It is the ballsiest sounding passive bass I have ever heard. There's just no other way to put it. It has a huge low end and a lot of grind. The tone knob tames it though, if needed. 

     

    Alder body, maple neck, rosewood board, 9.5" radius, high mass bridge. Weight is 4.45kg on my kitchen scales. 

     

    One tuner replaced with Hipshot tuner HB7 as there was a detuner installed by previous owner (and the original tuner was long gone). You can still see the old outline. Plus it once wore a pick holder on back of the headstock. Otherwise it's stock.

     

    Tons of wear, dings, scratches, you name it, mainly on the body, few dings on neck. Doesn't matter to me, it feels and looks great. It has polished up well and takes a nice low action with minimal relief. It's a nice neck and has decent frets with plenty of life. Truss rod works as it should. 

     

    They seem pretty rare. It's a nice bass. I'm looking for £550 + shipping. Open to offers. 

     

    Pete

     

    IMG_43014.thumb.jpg.55c5e3f759771bff837c6977cf4054e0.jpg

    IMG_43013.thumb.jpg.b2de6e1570884d90c8a5686da6b02fe6.jpg

    IMG_43015.thumb.jpg.a3cebef7a781b47ca329b6582d554ee7.jpg

    IMG_43016.thumb.jpg.4b704596958048d792ffa2751d23c01b.jpg

    IMG_43017.thumb.jpg.ddc2ad93b67ed50d805f5fd977cdcfb9.jpg

    IMG_43018.thumb.jpg.4c43dede2f26910fb22deb3c89f5bdc7.jpg

    IMG_43019.thumb.jpg.92fc163464012349227a4a2a932077a8.jpg

    IMG_43020.thumb.jpg.a6d8064f3979303b7e95fee6d4afe47a.jpg

    IMG_43021.thumb.jpg.109eaf2021a65694737caf2548470f41.jpg

    IMG_43024.thumb.jpg.bbf0006dead4a561d88c8ec3cb7a2259.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  4. Morning all. Just wanted to post an apology for less activity. 
     

    Turns out the gastroenteritis I thought I had was actually a form of colitis. Bit of a rough summer with a few trips to hospital, tests, etc etc.  However I’m coming back to life again and will shoot some video and post some updates. I’ve had a while to live with the bass as it is and it’s been useful. 

    • Like 7
  5. Hi all

     

    Up for sale is a used but  fully working Hipshot BT7 Detuner for Fender Mexico basses. I have a 5 string so I don't need this. It needs a little polishing/cleaning but is perfectly good. Comes with the ferrule and the screws you need as well. 

     

      IMG_0883.thumb.jpg.81afbbc973d39f571d5a6bc79fff08c9.jpg

     

    £50 posted in the UK. (New, they are £100 + postage.)

     

    Pete

    • Like 1
  6. Another brief aside. I'll repeat myself. The way the Wal pickups set their pickup heights is very intelligent.

     

    I would, if I were doing this all again, now choose the Wal pickup casing/mounting over the MM shape. The MM shape is cooler, but I can achieve a much wider range of pickup heights more easily using the Wal design than the MM shape/present mounting method. Live and learn! 

    • Like 2
  7. Ok, I am wrong again. The Wal does not behave differently. 

     

    Just tested out more detail on pickup heights using the Wal Mk1. It behaves exactly the same to my ears and under the scope as Chris' pickups in terms of my findings above re: frequency response and volume.

     

    I varied the height from 10mm away from the underside of a fretted string right down to 2mm away. Output changes significantly with height but the frequency response to my ears and under the frequency analyser, once level-matched, is the same. I don't get this; Wal themselves say in their materials that higher pickup heights make their pickups sound darker, but I cannot hear it or see it under the scope, so...This also contradicts my experiences earlier in the thread with lower pickup height improving tone on a Wal. I'm not sure what to make of this either. I definitely heard the change...hmm.  

     

     I'll now focus more on just getting more comparisons of the latest version of the Wal-ish recorded alongside the Wal. 

    • Like 3
  8. On 26/05/2023 at 22:59, funkle said:

    They are there indeed, and very useful.
     

    But I am also alluding to another issue which I haven’t talked about - even with the pickups screwed right down on the prototype body, I was picking up a lot more false harmonics than usual, created by how my right thumb rests on the string.  
     

    I hear this happen on my other basses, but quieter. It’s a problem of my technique. On the first prototype body, that happening was also a function of how close these powerful magnets were to the strings. I wasn’t getting wolf tones/warbling but I felt like maybe it wasn’t far off. 
     

    I can now set the pickups further away but boost the output, and have less noise from false harmonics. 

     

    Ok, I have recovered enough to do some more testing with pickup heights, and have surprised myself with the conclusions.

    • With this present set of pickups wired in parallel, when setting the polepiece anywhere from 5.5mm to within 1mm of the fretted string underside, I see no meaningful difference in frequency content. Volume changes significantly, but treble response does not. My ears have been fooling me; I thought they were darker at higher polepiece heights.
    • My issue with my right thumb creating false harmonics is not significantly different at different pickup heights,  it's just that they are more audible when the pickups are closer to the string (from the output jump). If I level match recordings done with polepieces set at 5.5mm and at 1mm they have the same amount of 'technique noise'.

    Proved myself wrong on a few counts. I guess it's why it's good to sit down and record/use a frequency analyser rather than my first subjective impressions.

     

    My take away for Chris' pickups (the MC4 SPSC versions I have presently) is that I can safely put them as close to the strings as I'd like. I guess other people's mileage may vary but that's what I've found. 

     

    I'll need to try and do the same experiment with the Wal. My hypothesis from previous experiences is that it will behave differently.  

    • Like 2
  9. Howdy all

     

    You know me to be in general a big fan of @stevie's work, and he kindly sent me the newest addition to the LFSys FRFR stable, the 1x 10" Monza cab, to try out. (https://www.lfsys.co.uk/bassguitarproducts)

     

    I'll start with some pics of it next to my LFSys 'Silverstone' 1x12" - actually the very first Basschat Mk3 FRFR 1x12", but with updated crossover and horn a la the SIlverstone cab from the LFSys range. Pardon the wear; it's been  out and about plenty. 

     

    image1.jpeg.0561199af9a1c283b8090d5f06b3fd94.jpeg

     

    image4.jpeg.0e10079ab2d1ba16fb74e737d8cd21f6.jpeg

     

    image2.jpeg.e986d72ca1c8eb25fa213a71d967fb54.jpeg

     

    image0.jpeg.1877763ffc9f6f30ad5da2b8a0221cc7.jpeg

     

     

    In short, it's a peach of a cabinet which I think can be the first 10" with a real claim to compete with a loud drummer. It is good for pub/club gigs; it handled rehearsals well with a loud drummer in a small enclosed space.  I tested it out for a week or so in a few settings with my Berg Mk1 B  Amp.

     

    I'll try to summarise the main points for me.

     

    • Every instrument I played through it sounded very natural, like playing through studio monitors. 
    • It has a solid but non-boomy bottom end and utterly clear midrange/treble. It sounds the same as my Silverstone in the mids and highs (same horn/compression driver explains this), though the Silverstone has a bigger low low end (the Monza has a tailored low end response to prevent boominess at high volume).
    • It can be heard very clearly standing directly in front of it, nearly on top of it, and well off axis.
    • The driver can take a substantial amount of low end EQ, and even outright misuse, if the user happens to be foolish (slapping with big bass boost).  
    • It takes a low B well. 
    • The finish is top notch and it looks great.
    • The handle is set flush with the to p, so can accommodate any head.
    • 11kg is a good weight for a 1 cab solution.   

     

    I don't have experience of the Barefaced 110T to compare it to, but I did have a BF 110 without the tweeter. I would say it's louder than the Barefaced 110 and has much clearer high end, unsurprisingly. Although it's heavier - 11kg vs 7kg.  The only other small 10 I've owned which could compare in terms of frequency range was the old Acme 1x10, and this is is much much louder.

     

    The main difference I hear between this and the 12" cabs in the LFSys range is that the low end is slightly different for all of them. The Silverstone 12" has the biggest low end, then the Monza 10", and then the Monaco 12" is the tightest (but still good). All of the cabs in the range share the same mid and high end frequency characteristics - totally clear FRFR sound. I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between them if you EQ'd the low end similarly, which you can.   

     

     I don't have any negatives to say about the cabinet. It's a premium product at a premium price, with top end components ands crossover. It is truly boutique. 

     

    Stevie is going to organise that this unit is sent around to other folks for them to try it out. I'd say fill yer boots, it sounds great!!! 

     

     

    image3.jpeg

    • Like 10
  10. 2 hours ago, bornleft said:

    So?


    So not much presently. I’ve had gastroenteritis for a week and it’s been a rough ride. I can just about eat one meal a day in the last day or two, which is progress. I’m also trying to sort out an issue with new numbered knobs and getting them to fit the pots properly which I need for proper testing. 
     

    I’m not one to post intemperately, but the tone and insistency to your posts have been frankly rude on more than a few occasions, which I previously chose to gloss over. That won’t be happening much longer; if you can’t manage to be polite/patient, I am simply going to block you. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...