Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Steve Woodcock

Member
  • Posts

    620
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Steve Woodcock

  1. Hi all,

     

    Sorry for the late reply, only just seen all these messages.

     

    20 hours ago, Happy Jack said:

    How does this fare on slightly rougher terrain - car parks, grassed areas in parks, etc?

     

     

    I haven't used it at any festivals but I imagine it would fare well—the mudguard will keep the bottom of the gig bag clean for a start! It has the same size wheels as the Bass Buggie, but because they are mounted proud you get more ground clearance; the only downside is the wheelbase is narrower—7" versus the Buggie's 13.5", in reality though I've found that the far greater surface area cradling the bass means that it feels much sturdier in this so none of the oscillation that we've both experienced with the Buggie, it's also more responsive to cornering. Having a bit of 'armour' around the lower bout of my bass has been useful in London tube travel...

     

    @Happy Jack, you are welcome to come and give it a test drive if you like as I can't find a box to post it to Lawrie.

     

    The only reason I'm keeping the Buggie over this is purely down to size—I've played a bunch of smaller jazz clubs where space was at a premium and trying to find a space to stash a gig bag and this was a challenge (same goes with my flat!), otherwise I'd be keeping it.

     

     

  2. Here is an innovative alternative to a bass wheel, designed and hand made by double bassist Steve Berry (of Loose Tubes fame). More info here at http://www.wheelbass.co.uk/

     

    The substantial 'mudguard' cradle of this has protected my bass well from doorways and other such dangers, but I have recently opted for the lighter and more compact solution of a Bass Buggie.

     

    Collection only from London W4.

    IMG_1380.jpg

    IMG_1381.jpg

    IMG_1382.jpg

    IMG_1383.jpg

    IMG_1385.jpg

    IMG_1387.jpg

    • Like 1
  3. 11 hours ago, Caz said:

    Hi Steve - yes good point, thanks. I had that at first, then wondered because it's E minor is flatting an already flat note in the scale just double flatting so decided on VImaj7 and VII9, then saw in the Berklee course they go for bVImaj7 and bVII9. By the time I did the Luther chart a few days later, which is basically the exact same chords in a different order, I had corrected the terminology - well spotted!

     

    Think of the major scale as being the 'default' position of the scale degrees on which we build chords and name them in relation to that.

     

  4. On 11/06/2022 at 16:05, Caz said:

    Finally got around to making a chart for American Boy. Still think it's interesting the E maj / E minor thing, have written it in E minor with a bit of harmonic analysis underneath the stave.

     

    American_Boy.thumb.jpg.09d0184ea1bbcb96a30004f2accdfa04.jpg

     

    Hi Caz, you're nearly there:

    • Yes, it's in E minor - the Imaj7 chord is from the parallel key of E major.
    • Cmaj7 is a bVImaj7
    • D9 is a bVII9 - it functions as a substitute for the V chord (sometimes referred to as a backdoor dominant)
    • Fmaj7 is a bIImaj7 and is from the parallel E Phrygian mode

     

    On 18/06/2022 at 12:03, Caz said:

    Here's another example of modal interchange, borrowing from the parallel major. This one's more clearly in the minor key than American Boy or Luther, it just tonicizes the parallel major key in the post-chorus and borrows from it (the G chords) at the end of each section.

    Crazy.thumb.jpg.cd52ab3e463fb0d7d0e1f2e7517475d0.jpg

     

    Don't view G as borrowed from the parallel major, it's diatonic to C (harmonic) minor

     

     

    14 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

    Suffice to say, one of the songs dropped on him was Maxwell's Silver Hammer...

     

    The sort of song where if you don't know it  you won't be able to anticipate most of the chord changes

     

    Maxwell's Silver Hammer is not difficult, it just contains a few secondary dominants (indicated by V7/_ on the chart below): 

     

    1482540308_MaxwellsSilverHammerAnalysis.thumb.jpg.7eefbbe5c6502d04a685cee2de23c4b1.jpg

    • Like 1
  5. On 26/02/2022 at 10:55, sykilz said:

    Oooh, really like that.

    I'm more of a traditional metal guy, but that's great, the reason I found this thread is I saw a mate's sons band yesterday they were ??death core???, anyway, they had a fretless bass player and it just didn't work for me, all very boomy and ill defined, but this is what it should be like, your playing in this track is very well defined and punchy. 
    Do you think that the fretless makes a huge difference in the final mixed track as opposed to a fretted? Or have you always played a fretless in such bands so don't know/care??😆

     

    Thanks @sykilz, I'm glad you liked it.

     

    That's a good question: honestly no, I don't think it did make a huge difference - in fact when I submitted the session file the guys in the band didn't even realise it was fretless! 🙄 I'll take that as a compliment about my intonation I guess, haha 😅 I've been playing fretless for about 26 years now I think and have used it in similar settings throughout that time but ultimately my decision to use it on this particular session was because their previous bassist had established fretless as part of the band's sound on their previous four albums.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...