Doctor J

Your 5er wasn't the same colour? I might have it now too

It's heartening to see three old ESPs in the lists here

Well I have some others but these four are the cream of the crop, I'll just have to work on number 5.

[b]ESP 400 Series Jazz[/b]. My best buddy for almost 20 years. The Sadowsky came and went, the ESP stays for life. Nuff said.

+


[b]Bacchus Woodline P Classic[/b]. More balls than Wimbledon.




[b]Bacchus Standard 5[/b]. This thing has the tone, you know what I'm talking about.




[b]Godlyke Disciple[/b]. Spent a bit of time on this just tweaking the setup and rolling the neck edges and it really is a superb bass. Sold the Stingray as a result.

Might be a good idea to remove the email addresses from the original post unless you want to wind up on every spam-list on the internet

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of you

They're better than they look, in my humble opinion, I love what they do.

Yeah, I use it every now and then on my Bacchus P for some fat thumb work. It's not a playing style I'd use all the time, not at all, but for certain occasions it's just right.

I've started hankering after a hollowbody, just wondering if anyone has any advice or experience they can offer. Not too fussy, but would prefer 34" scale. The Lakland intrgues me but the Skyline price is a bit offputting. Budget will be about a grand or so.

"The ESP", "The Bacchus P", "The Streamer", etc. The clue is in the name and I likes it that way.

Almost identical

I thought it was so the bridge pickup would finally reside under the bridge pickup cover, whereas it sticks out with the 60's positioning. The pickup is closer to the bridge too, so not sure if it's a simple re-alignment.

I used to have a 77. Not a bad bass as such, but the routing templates they used at that point were seriously worn, so neck pockets and even pickup routes were sloppy and that bridge is just junk, no other word for it and these are things which are consistent on the "good" ones and "bad" ones. Regardless of them being hit and miss and the absurd prices you see them selling for, they are cheaply made basses, no doubt about it. It's easy to get caught up in the "mojo" or whatever you want to call it and convince yourself that a piece of crap has 30+ years of magic so I [i]must[/i] be good, you might even get something which has been made into a great (albeit heavy) bass, but were I spending the money again I would look at something else. There are so many genuinely superb J basses available for that kind of money which merely lack 30 years worth of kudos but are so much better built. My advice whenever it comes to these basses is buy a good bass, not just an old bass.

[quote name='Tinman' post='787151' date='Mar 26 2010, 04:28 PM']Ahh, another Eggle fan. See? I'm not alone. [/quote]
Indeed. It's the short lived Iommi sig, based on their Vienna model, essentially a genuinely huge slab of mahogany and almost as heavy as the 77 J I used to have. But the tone, [i]the tone[/i]

I used to have an Ibanez SR3006, ended up selling it cos it was too narrow for me. Very nice bass, however. Don't let the Ibanez name put you off, the high end SRs are very well put together.

I'm, too, am guilty. Picked these up over the years, I rather like them.

[quote name='Linus27' post='775605' date='Mar 15 2010, 07:53 PM']OH WOW :) That looking superb and I love all the battle scars. I know, very unlikley but if you ever have a moment of madness and want to sell, let me know [/quote]
We both know that's never gonna happen

[quote name='Linus27' post='774791' date='Mar 14 2010, 11:11 PM']One of my best sounding and playing basses I own is an ESP 400 series jazz, seen in the below picture (black with white scratchplate) and based on a 1962 Fender Jazz. Its from 1988 and is uber rare because it has the same headstock as a Fender. I think at the time, ESP were making parts for Fender Japan in the same factory so it could well had ended up as a Fender. I have never ever seen another ESP bass with this headstock. My bass has served me really well and done 100's of gigs. I would never ever sell it.[/quote]
Now you've seen two

Like yours, mine is an 87 or 88, I got it in 93. I've done 100's of gigs with it too. In those years the likes of Sadowsky, Fender, Rickenbacker, Warwick, EBMM have come and gone, but this one stays. It's the bass for all occasions. Despite being a real prick for messing around with aftermarket bits, this one is still stock and it's the best sounding and playing bass I have. The headstock is a bit thicker than any Fender I've seen, I think this was as they were leaving the aftermarket parts business and becoming a full on manufacturer.

I'd nominate anyone who'd come up with something unique and interesting, not just another bog standard J bass but in a different shade of orange.

The bass of the moment is a Wal MkII. Never really thought too much about them during the lull over the last few years, but, now that they're available again, I've got to say I'm rather tempted to go for it.

Nice collection. You like Fenders then?

It's as above but a 3 way rotary pickup switch and the two mini toggles are series/parallel switch for each pickup, at least that's how it was on my SB-R80.

The wire fconnected to the controls usually connects to the G side of the D-G pickup and then from the D side to the A side where both pickups are connected, there may not be enough slack to completely rotate both pickups but there should be enough slack to rotate the E-A pickup. All you do is unscrew, keep an eye out if it uses springs to keep resistance between the body and the pickup, turn the pickup around and screw back in, making sure the screws stay inside the springs (some basses use foam) and that the wire is nowhere near the screws. Take your time and don't force the screws back in, find the existing hole, it's very easy to gouge a new hole in the body if you apply too much force with the screw in the wrong place.

[quote name='alexisonfire' post='638756' date='Oct 28 2009, 08:28 AM']Im using Daddario Pro Steels [/quote]
Heh heh heh it was worth asking, I generally love the sound of Rotosounds but I've come across too many duff E strings over the years, sometimes a new pack yields the same problem.

If it sounds ok acoustically then that rules out any nut or bridge issue. The nut is only a factor when you play an open string anyway. If this deadness is still there when you fret, then it's not the nut. You could swap the A and E bridge saddles too, rule out the bridge.

Anyway, what might be worth trying is reversing the pickup under your E and A strings so the posts under the A string are now under the E string and vice versa. It should rule the pickup in or out as an issue fairly quickly, just make sure you don't put a screw through the wire when you're seating it, it's easy to do.

On the off chance, this isn't a Rotosound string, by any chance?

Can you distinguish if it's an electrical or acoustic problem - ie, can you hear if it's dead sounding when you play it unplugged?

Squier by Fender and Orville by Gibson spring to mind

[quote name='wateroftyne' post='634396' date='Oct 23 2009, 01:01 PM']To be fair, the standard of Jazzes in '77 is well documented to be pretty hit-and-miss.[/quote]
True, but there was nothing amiss in general terms, the bridge was in the right place, never had any trouble with the 3 bolt neck, there was nothing glaringly wrong with it, no obvious Friday afternoon symptoms. There was nothing there to suggest there was something specificially off with it, that the next one down the line would be any better.

It was just a ho-hum instrument, not very bad, but not very good or legend justifying either.

Edit -> I'll add that I've played a good few other 70's Fenders over the last 20 years but I've concentrated on the one I owned for a few years. A mate's 74 P had the same shoddy routing, I've never played one that comes anywhere to justifying the prices they're now going for.

Selling a Wal for one? I think I'm gonna cry.