Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

NancyJohnson

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    6,015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by NancyJohnson

  1. 7 hours ago, PaulWarning said:

    I get the impression that the artists that some BCers think ought to pack it in are the artists the never liked much when they were at their peak

     

    Not in the slightest.  Pretty much every band I followed in my youth are (sadly) still out there doing it in some capacity or another and I honestly wish they weren't.  It simply dilutes any legacy.  I want to remember Vince Neil trying to sing in tune as a skinny drug-riddked brat, not trying to sing in tune as a soberish bloated guy in his middle-60s.  Little interest in revisting any of these bands (or singers fronting new line-ups) live, either.

     

    Read my post on page 7 of this thread:

     

     

     

  2. 28 minutes ago, Supernaut said:

    Tell that to all the over 65s still working and not letting the youngsters have a job. 😂

     

    It's odd, when I was a kid, it was all 18-30 holidays, the original supermodels, yuppies and so on.  All these people are now pushing 60 (at least) and they're all desperately looking to hold onto something from their youth.  Look at Kiss, Simmons is 75 or something, Madonna is 65, Nikki Sixx is 64, same goes Joe Elliot.  Vince Neil 62 and despite his stomach surgery, he lumps around like a beached pilot whale and still can't sing.  I love early Motley and was a huge fan of Kiss until about 1980, but there's no merit whatsoever in what they're doing now and it just p*sses over whatever remains of their legacy.

     

    I'm not being ageist, but if that was mum up there doing what Madonna is doing, I'd be horrendously embarrassed.  There is nothing remotely sexy or alluring about what she's doing, despite what she probably thinks.  Thing is, nobody has got the strength to tell these people that it's time to stop, give it up and go live off your millions.  But hey, there's always one more payday.

    • Like 1
  3. There's certainly a ton of bands out there that are still gigging when they're well past theur sell-by date, but if tickets sell then they'll keep doing shows.

     

    Look at recent/ongoing/upcoming tours by Kiss, Motley Crue/Def Leppard, Elton John, Madonna, Stevie Nicks (and so on); IMO these should all have hung up their boots many years ago, but until people stop paying £250 for a seat in the gods to watch a lipsynching granny in basque cavort about with dancers half her age, then they'll keep doing it.

     

     

    • Like 5
  4. Diminishing returns.  It might actually be cheaper to source a new neck rather than to cover the cost of a refret.

     

    No idea of the model you're considering selling, the market value or what you reckon you could sell it for, but assume a refret will cost you £250-300.  That's a sizeable unrecoverable percentage of the current instrument value.

    • Like 2
  5. On 07/10/2023 at 00:02, Marc S said:

    OMG - I recall this going out on TV at the time, but had forgotten about it until now. 

    I remember watching Swap Shop all too well.... and thinking it was the best thing since Double Deckers! Lol. Also, used to quite fancy Maggie Philbin - all too predictably

     

    I have (to give it its full title), Here Come The Double Deckers on DVD.  It's a wonderful thing.

     

    Pretty frightening to think that Peter Firth, who played Scooper, was 70 yesterday.

     

     

  6. On 23/10/2023 at 15:21, neepheid said:

    D!ck Heads Limited.

     

    Chortle. 

     

    My mum knew a guy who was at DHL when it was a smallish operation here, just expanding into Europe, so mid-late 1970s. 

     

    He was always on the lookout for 'smart, intelligent kids' to courier documents to New York/Boston and back; flight there, cab (or picked up from the airport) into Manhattan, wait for documents to be signed, overnight somewhere if necessary, cab back to airport, fly home.  It was cheaper to fly and pay a 14/15 year old rather than an adult and cheaper as you weren't on the payroll.

     

    Foolishly I never took his offer up, but a friend of mine did it quite a few times; he'd just throw a Monday or Friday sickie from school (he'd fly out early Friday morning and be in Manhattan around lunchtime), 'grumbling appendix' was the main reason given, all with his parent's approval!  He'd take orders for records, so he'd come back with a rucksack of vinyl and always had loads of ready £££.  He claims to have popped his cherry on one trip.  What a life. 

     

    I envy him to this day and he still has his appendix!

     

     

     

     

    • Like 5
    • Haha 3
  7. On 26/10/2023 at 14:41, J66Bass said:

    Thanks, Wow that’s definitely loads of work for just sending a bass , hmm the bass is Made in Japan in 79 ! And a value of 6 hundred pounds max , hmm I think I m not going to bother , thanks for the reply 

     

    When I was reading this part, first thing I thought was - assuming it is/was a production line instrument - surely the same bass would be available somewhere in the colonies already.  And cheaper.

  8. I suppose I look on these units like a comfy pair of slippers; Ithe trials and tribulations I've gone through with the AO900 just prompted me to (re)investigate the POD again.

     

    Oddly, and in consideration of the journey so far, I was always happy tonally with what the Bass POD did, it was largely the design that was it's downfall.  Suppose it's in our nature to strive for betterment of sorts.  Ultimately when I unearthed my desired tones (and saved them) on the POD, I rarely strayed from these.  When the POD went, I just went straight to a Sansamp BDDI.

     

    I've seen these units for about £100 online.  It might be worth a punt at some point.  I wouldn't mind another rack.

     

     

    • Like 2
  9. Anyone running one of these?  The rack version:

    BassPODxtPro_Face_Clr-5ee41fba90ccd4ca01

     

    It's odd, I've gone through so much kit in the last 20-odd years, ran one of the kidney-shaped Bass PODs for a while but the rack XT passed me by.  I've seen a few on eBay/Reverb in the last few days and am wondering how they've stood the test of time in the last 10-15 years and I just have a little hankering for one.

     

    You don't see them come up that often.  There must be hundreds of them just sitting under beds.

     

  10. To this day, I still really enjoy early Rush (aside from Caress of Steel), but fell out of love from Signals on.  The one overriding thing with them though - Neil Peart included - is that it's obvious there's huge chemistry between them, there's humour and they really don't seem to have any issue in poking fun as themselves.  Just look at the dinner film they did.  It's hilarious.

     

    Like many of us here, we've seen the Beyond The Lighted Stage documentary and from this and the many interviews with Geddy and Alex, like Taylor Swift, they seem incredibly likeable - the Dan Rather thing with Geddy Lee was great too.  I'm of the belief that the joy we can get from Geddy transcends music itself. 

     

    Looking forward to this.

    • Like 7
  11. 10 hours ago, basshead56 said:

    To me it seems between dUg and AO, there isn't much you cant get when it comes to heavy.

     

    Your comments pretty much mirror my experiences.  

     

    Around 20 years ago I started using a bass POD (into the effects return of an Ashdown MAG combo); this was back when Line6 were actively sharing settings that allowed you to emulate (well known) player's tone(s).

     

    Looking back, this was one of my happiest times.  A revelation.  As time went on, the outboard kit got smaller (BDDI,GT2, VTBASSDI) and amplification got bigger.  I started using a rack/Poweramp set up (RBI, then the GED unit).  I bought a dUg and GED2112DI for recording and then the AO900 arrived; as mentioned earlier, I honestly figured it would be a one-box solution to my needs.

     

    It's a head that needs curating; to achieve parity from bass to bass it's easier to simply do the work with the basses so the tonal characteristics of each one are more or less the same.  Once you have the amp set up to your requirements, it's a fantastic thing.  It's the journey there that's a bit lumpy.

     

    Writing this is a little cathartic.  I'd almost forgotten about the POD entirely, but it was a huge part of the journey tonally.  It was just so damn simple to just jack it into an amp and it sounded fantastic.

     

    ...just off to eBay for a peruse.

     

     

  12. 8 hours ago, Downunderwonder said:

    What about the older Landmark, RBI/RPM flavour?

     

    600w of either, or blend.

     

    I owned a Landmark 300 head for a while - decent but not loud enough/enough headroom.  Could never find a 600w one.  

     

    I suppose my point was more about if @Tech21NYC could produce a compact/loud Class-D head with an RBI front end, I'd be set for life.  Giving this a little more thought (a dangerous thing, that), wouldn't it be a thing if there was a one box modular head (like the MarkBass MoMark thing) whereby you bought a 900w class-D amp/box and you could simply slot in a GED/dUg/Harris module.

    • Like 1
  13. 11 minutes ago, Cosmo Valdemar said:

    FTFY 😁

     

    Oooh.  I honestly thought he'd used a baritone guitar on that.  So there's two channels of bass, then.  The ponk on the intro/left channel is Campbell playing Danelectro Longhorn (apparently).  Carol Kaye played a regular Precision on it.

     

    This is quite beautiful:

     

    • Like 1
  14. It's 8.20am.  I'm working from home today, starting at 9.00am and I'm still in bed.

     

    My wife doesn't sleep well at all (awake from about 4.00am today, which isn't unusual) and is presently next to me rolled tight in the duvet, fast asleep.  She's doing this shallow snoring that I find very comforting to listen to.

     

    😊

    • Like 1
  15. It's extremely difficult to quantify the nuances of tone by application of verbs; somewhat akin to trying to describe colour to a blind person.

     

    Interesting an earlier post alluded to Alice In Chains.  I remember listening to Dirt years ago and thinking (at the time) that Mike Starr's tone was quite dark, without any context as to what dark actually means.  I suppose it's simply heavy on bass frequencies, plus a bit of overdrive.  In truth it's really not that different to the tone Steve Priest was using during the golden era of The Sweet (Sweet F*nny Adams/Desolation Boulevard), 20 years earlier.

     

    As time has gone on - and given how businesses like Darkglass have curated and developed circuitry to create extremely 'dark' tones - Starr's tone has become less dark.  This is much like how what passed for heavy metal in the 1970s could now pass as radio friendly pop/rock.

     

    About the only terminology that hits home for me is something I started using a few years ago.  Ponk.  It just seems to sum up the burpy/muted tone that extends from Motown through The Carpenters and even the baritone of Wichita Lineman.

     

     

  16. 23 minutes ago, Angelus said:

    Had a very good chat with the guys in the new band. We had an offer of a gig pretty soon and spent an hour of rehearsal regurgitate 20 odd songs we all knew, just to do the gig. Then one of guys asked why we are doing all the same stuff again? A decision was made that we continue with our ideal setlist and not do a gig until we’re ready for it. 

     

    I was given all the tracks nearly a year ago.  Like a good little worker bee, I learnt everything.  Never really felt the line up was particularly cohesive; never felt that the three musicians had a voice on equal to the singer.

  17. Just now, AndyTravis said:


    The death of the last band was the singer.

     

    Lovely bloke, but a pain in the ar$e to work with. 
     

    Myself and the drummer walked on the same day…speaks volumes.

     

    Maybe we were a bit precious in the end - no matter, what’s done is done.

     

    Me and the drummer left about a day apart.  The prospect of going through the whole process of having a new drummer and relearning the same 12 songs with him (or her) was a prospect I just couldn't face.

    • Sad 1
  18. 10 minutes ago, AndyTravis said:


    well, I’m going to wait for the bass less versions of some tracks to come over.

     

    this is another thing I don’t miss - waiting.

     

    my in-built impatience and expectation for others to be the same.

     

    I know that’s my flaw.

     

    I was with the last band for nearly a year.  Just sick of rotating the same dozen songs, the vetoing of new material, not jamming etc. Suppose this is what it must be if you're just a backing musician.

     

    Interestingly, the singer has lost his whole band in the last ten weeks.  This probably says a lot for what we were sold Vs the actual reality.

    • Like 3
  19. Well, all my basses are now away.  We've got friends coming over tonight and my wife just went, 'Can you get all this stuff out of the hallway?' 

     

    Seemed as good as time as any.  I spent a bit of time doing a bit of sorting out, giving them a little clean, making sure each case contained the correct strap, a headstock tuner, a couple of spare picks and closed each case.

     

    I suppose, that's going to be it for the time being.  

     

    • Sad 6
×
×
  • Create New...