NancyJohnson

21 hours ago, ped said:

Look at 70s Fenders - they haven't changed, but the price has gone up because sellers are asking for more, people buy them and feel they have done well, perception of the 70s period changes somewhat because it's driven by new enthusiasts who have literally invested in it...

Aah, to be old enough to remember when discussions about Fender's 70s QC always achieved consensus that a high percentage of their basses were dogs.  Not the dogs.  Now they're considered vintage.

The marketplace is an odd one.  From a guitar perspective, I see an awful lot of very similar kit - dozens of posts for Fender Precision and Jazz basses, along with a proliferation of Stingrays; it's almost like it's getting to the point where there needs to be sub-forums by manufacturer!

The trends within the Basses For Sale threads as well...there'll be nothing for sale made by (for instance) Lakland, then there's a few for no reason.  Almost as if one guy decided to sell, them several other people see that and decide to follow suit.  

It's not just basses, remember.  MM prices are ridiculous generally. 

Fell in love with the St Vincent HH guitar a while back, retail of the production model 3 x mini-bucker model is now ridiculously nudging £3.5k (and this coming from someone who paid nearly £4k for a Gibson Theodore). 

I asked MM if they could do one with a single humbucker and just a single volume control - less work for them, just take it out of the router earlier, eh? - eventually got a reply, over a grand mark up. 

Bonkers.

First and foremost I'm fairly picky about the basses I've bought (one or two clunkers, but hey-ho), so wouldn't necessarily buy anything that doesn't fit my needs.

Upgrade routes?  Always put Dunlop Straploks on everything and with the old Thunderbird basses I'd always swap the bridge to either the Hipshot or Babicz replacements.  

More recently I've dropped John East circuits into my Lulls.  They just expand things, give them a bit more oomph.  That's all really.

7 minutes ago, Schnozzalee said:

@NancyJohnson yep?

Nope.  The 'lawsuit' was Gibson Vs Ibanez.  1970s.  

After some distinctly odd weeks, I left my current band at the weekend. 

By way of background, while there was a handful of high-points, although some ten months in and I don't honestly believe we'd progressed that much from our first rehearsal. 

Tired of being a backing musician to a singer that wasn't a musician.  Detest playing covers (even if those were part of the singer's pro-career).  Got zero credit, reprimanded for having the wrong attitude because I hadn't learnt Suffragette City, moaned at if I played something wrong, the endless repetition at rehearsals (running through of the same twelve or thirteen songs a couple of times), the constant vetoing of ideas and new material (which also sucked out any desire I may have had for songwriting as well).  Jamming was actively discouraged.  Little band chemistry.  Being told what to wear at gigs and being told which bass I should be using from a front man that doesn't actually play an instrument, were many of the straws that broke the camel's back.  

Right now I'm genuinely untroubled at not being in a band; I couldn't feel any less inclined to travel three hours to play 45 minutes to an uninterested group of ten people and then do the return journey home.

I'm not on cusp of giving up as such, but I'm certainly giving some thought to having a Grande Sell Off at some point.  I don't know if I'm actually bothered about being in a band any more.

Lawsuit, y'say?

10 minutes ago, robiredale said:

I've got an AO900 and love it. etc.

 

I think the standout thing from your post is the idea of going through an EQ pedal first.  I'm not a fan of stomps per se; it was fine when my old Sansamp BDDI or RBI were just being jacked into a power amp, but beyond that, they just get in the way.  Of the main instruments I use regularly (I tend to rotate basses), three have John East circuits retro fitted and the other is a Spector with a stock Tone Pump.  These circuits should (in theory) give me enough front end tonal options.

At the end of the day, still feel the AO900 is an amp that you need to curate; it's a very fine line between all or nothing tonally.

I'd forgotten these three completely. 

I was at the Hammersmith for shows that became CD3 of Rush's Different Stages set (Feb '78), Blackfoot's Highway Song Live and Whitesnake's Live At Hammersmith.

As my brother dropped out of the Rush gig at the last minutes, I went with the 'hardened gig-goer' who was my brother's girlfriend's brother.  I remember the opening riff to Bastille Day and everyone standing up.  He remained seated, shouting to me, 'Everyone will sit down in a minute.'

My best mate is on Human Punk by The Ruts.

You can clearly hear it's him shouting along and he's the one who goes, 'Aaaaaaw, Hooman punk' on the fade out.

Back on OP, a couple of Fender Jazzes. 

On the OP, my thing was Thunderbirds.  Nobody (at that time) was particularly interested in them, so you could pick them up for £750-£800.  So I did.  Lots of them.

When time came to start moving them on, more of a demand, so it was easily possible to turn a profit.  Playing the long game.  Do your diligence.  There's several resources out there (Reverb/Talkbass/eBay/here) where you should be able to ascertain the current market price even if the instrument is a short run model.

Thing is, the market shifts.  Look at what you can pick up a used Warwick for nowadays.  Bonkers.  There's too many basses/guitars being made and my gut feeling is that less and less musicians (those darn kids) are particularly interested in the nuances in more expensive/special edition kit.  A Jazz Bass is a Jazz Bass, irrespective of how much Fender try and sex them up.

Rehearsed this afternoon with Eddie Roxy & The Adjacent Kings.  We're going to get another one in next Friday (13th), then we're at The Night Owl, Finsbury that night (https://www.fatsoma.com/e/v35rh1z0/lost-kitten-presents-desperate-fun-eddie-roxy-and-the-adjacent-kings-high-functioning) and doing a punk lunch upstairs at The Prince Alfred, Brighton from 2.15pm Sunday afternoon (15th).

Today I'm working and listening to Frankie Goes To Hollywood.

A while back, I bought the deluxe editions of both albums and painstakingly removed all the chuff they put inbetween the songs.  It flows excellently without these distractions.

I haven't read this stuff in a long time.  Enjoying this.  It's a little trip down memory lane during an otherwise terrible afternoon.

When I set up the first Nancy Johnson site (2006), it was more a treatment to test rudimentary .html, css, embedding Flash content, graphics and creative writing.  It was very basic stuff but reading it now makes me smile.  There's pages and pages of ridiculously stupid overblown content.

Of course it's all fluff.  We played with a band from Basingstoke one time and their manager had clearly read the site and actually asked how our dates went in Uzbekistan.  I've never been further east than Cyprus.

+

I saw her at Wembley Arena around this time.  It wasn't a particularly enthralling gig; it was very low on content and high on padding out.  Every song ending was about five minutes long, with her just going, 'Oooooooohwahwahwahwaaaaaaaaah,' and she bought her mum out for another five minutes of the same.

That said, her voice was incredible.  What a waste.  Just say no, kids.

The Surround Series edition of XTC's 'The Big Express' arrived yesterday.  Been so busy building a wall and doing family shizz, just sitting down for a listen.

I don't have an ATMOS system, so just good old Dobly 5.1.  Really very good.  The more Steven Wilson does of these, the better they get.  (The Tears For Fears stuff is sublime.)

I know there's been issues locating the masters for the rest of their back catalogue, I'm really hoping this won't be the last one.  This one was a very pleasant surprise when it was announced.

Size aside, the tech behind the visuals has been in place for quite a while.  In simplistic terms, capture is done digitally or on a large format wet film (ie IMAX) using a single or multiple fish-eye lens(es).  The image, when displayed on a spherical canvas plays back without any wide-angle aberration.  Simple, but very clever.

Pity it's U2.

7 hours ago, Lozz196 said:

I’ve just got in from a Black Stone Cherry gig. The guitarists used various guitars, Gretsch, PRS, Fender, Gibson, the bassist used Stingrays and various different types of Fenders.

 

The band sounded pretty much the same throughout. 
 

So if a band sounds the same with different brands of instruments then yes, very unlikely that different bridges or pickups would be noticeable at that volume. 

It's a case of look-at-me syndrome.  We're all guilty of it.

I suppose it's all about how we're wired; I've never really been the type of person who has any desire to follow the pack insofar as instrument choice goes, but I do like to use well set up instruments that look good. 

Knowing how you want to sound is the primary thing, a very high percentage of [your] tone comes from amplifier and outboard kit, not the guitar itself.

1 hour ago, goonerjoe said:

 

To quote Peep Show:

 

"Do you have to live quite so relentlessly in the real world?"

 

It's a fair point though...

The colloquial 'we' spend an absolute fortune on 'improvements' on instruments; bridges, machines, pickups, preamps, nonsense about 'tonewoods', neck materials, frets.  And so on.  We worry about neck profiles and width of nuts.  Poly/nitro finishes.

Years ago, owned a Mustang bass.  To my delight, under the chrome pickup cover was a Stratocaster pickup.  It sounded perfectly fine.  This my friends was a turning point for me where aftermarket upgrades are concerned. 

The only reason to replace any hardware is if it's broken, missing or doesn't work properly.

Here comes the voice of reason.

For assorted reasons, swapped out a fair few pickups in my time, irrespective of the maker/cost etc, the end result is that all of them sound more or less the same. 

All this nonsense about growl, vintage warmth/aggression can be dialled in from your amp/outboard gear.  Any nuances from pickup to pickup will be lost in a full-band context anyway.  Your listening audience don't give a toot about your pickup choice either!

Go with the cheapest or the ones that suit your visual aesthetic.  Even better, support small makers, like Josi Warman.

This video popped up on my You Tube feed yesterday.  I've shown little interest in Harley Benton products (but I suppose at the entry-level price point(s), they're probably a decent option if you're looking to build/customise something).  Instrumentwise, I'm no fan of the headstocks, but they do mention a Firebird model, which could look nice if it had the bound Jaguar neck on it with blocks on it (that features in the 25th Anniversary models).

Anyhow, bass stuff is from about nine minutes.  There's a nice prototype EB2 style thing; the headstock looks decent (no bits missing), don't really like the look of the machines - cloverleafs might look nicer.  The travel bass is interesting!

3 hours ago, fretmeister said:

The AO type pedals and amps are far closer to fuzz than clank.

 

I used to get a good clank out of a V1 MT900 so I see no reason why the V2 wouldn't do it. I have not tried the X series stuff, but the drive section seems to be voiced a lot more similar to the B*K series than the AO.

 

Why not buy a X7 pedal and run it into the FX loop on your AO900? Or straight in the front with no drive on the amp? That would be a lot cheaper.

Or have a good audition of the X7 to see if the X series will do it - you can always return the pedal after trying it out.

I've got Ged2112 DI and a the Dug Pinnick stomps, have tried both into the effects return (with limited success tbh).  I suppose I'm not really interested in throwing ££ at more hardware.  Looking for a one box solution.

1 hour ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said:

I’ve been using the Microtubes 900 v2 since its release and I couldn’t be more pleased with it. I had the original 900 before it, which was also a good amp.

I’m not sure swapping what you already have to the X900 is going to give you what you want though.

I’d be interested to hear the results of a side by side if you could get it arranged.

I think I need some dirt, it's a fundamental factor in the tone I'm chasing.  I ran a Sansamp RBI into a poweramp for years, the only reason for downgrading was that I was just sick of the weight of everything!  If Tech21 rolled out an RBI head (like the old VT Bass), I'd be in.