Andyjr1515

OK - this works from a functional point of view. Even when weight relieved and long-scale, it should balance on the strap with the strap button somewhere around the 13th/14th fret. There should also be decent access up to and including the 22nd fret. The upper bout to lower bout length difference is greater than a standard SG but I think visually it will look close enough for an 'in the style of' (as there is a size difference on the real ones), particularly once the bevels have been carved. Anyway, no point in building something Pete can't play so I think this is the shape and layout I'll go for. Now I can work out the controls and weight-relief chamber positions and, hopefully soon, start cutting some wood

Now this is the part where you think you are going nowhere, but if you skimp on it, most likely you're going nowhere....it's the planning stage. The number of times I've routed out a weight relief chamber, and then gone to fit the bridge bushes and...ahhhh, now then, never thought of THAT The main issue here is about balance, weight distribution and scale reach. Although the original EB3 was short scale (although they did do a few long scale ones later), Pete wants 34". He also wants it weight-relieved. Alarm bells then start ringing:[list] [*]If you join the neck where the original was joined, you will struggle to reach the first fret and it will be neck heavy like there is no tomorrow. This is exacerbated by the short upper horn of the SG design - compare this: [/list] ...to this: [list] [*]If you bring the bridge rearward to shorten the apparent scale length, you won't be able to reach the upper frets, due to the relatively small cut-out of the lower horn [/list] So I have spent a lot of time this morning checking the maximum I can afford to bring the bridge back with where that logically means the fretboard needs to meet the body and what the maximum reach from the lower cutout to the 22nd fret would be (it will have 24 frets but I reckon Pete will only be able to comfortably reach 22 of them) With a tiny tweak of the lower horn to deepen the cutout (and maybe a very small extension to the upper horn) I reckon I can get it to work. Visually, I think it still looks like an SG:

[quote name='JPJ' timestamp='1470601803' post='3107065'] Mother fetch the gun, the boy has gone near that red stain...... :-) [/quote] As everybody knows, my name is Bert and I live in Spalding and I'm young and tall and can sing like a lark...you can't miss me

[quote name='3below' timestamp='1470602214' post='3107067'] The figured timber is stunning. Will it have the 666 model number engraved on the truss rod cover? [/quote] Now there's a thought...

[quote name='Rumple' timestamp='1470640931' post='3107198'] Not a lot as I have had a relative staying for the last few weeks, I did manage to get another coat of paint on and drill the hole from the battery compartment to the control cavity. [/quote] Every little helps - 'every step is a step closer'

Another thread I missed the end of along the way That is sooooooo good you could eat it

Somehow missed the update on this! Looking good from here Any more progress since your last post?

That looks really nice, Grangur. The owner will be over the moon

Although they are regarded by some as poor relations, after a lot of reading up, I fitted DiMarzio PJ s to Kert (FuNkShUi)'s camphor single cut custom job http://www.ajrguitarmods.co.uk/camphor%20single%20cut%20bass.htm Time and time again in various forums and reviews they were said to punch well above their weight, be very well balanced and also that the noiseless J was a great boon. Now admittedly I also fitted the Seymour Duncan 2band EQ for maximum flexibility, but both Kert and I have both been VERY impressed how good they sound even at fully neutral EQ. Kert has done a video demo ( I think the link is on the thread).

Great job . Quite a transformation!

[quote name='MoonBassAlpha' timestamp='1470521927' post='3106570'] Looks like the Hohner Steinberger system. You slide the saddle under string tension then lock all the saddles with sideways force using that grub screw visible at the side of the bridge. [/quote] Ah...OK, that makes sense. Thanks

Great job, Grangur

I agree with Scojack - will watch with interest. There are some nice features on the bass. The bridge is intriguing - how do you adjust the intonation?

[quote name='Wolverinebass' timestamp='1470343686' post='3105419'] Where do we place our orders?!! [/quote] In the deep pit that JPJ is going to chuck me down

Huge amount of attention to detail here, Grangur. It's going to look absolutely splendid when it's all put together

Great job on the bridge, Andy! Looks like - actually, better than - new!

[quote name='Myke' timestamp='1470337360' post='3105309'] You obviously have an eye for these things because I wouldn't have ever thought to do colour it! [/quote] It's also that the one stipulation I have been given is that it has got to be red - otherwise heaven knows what I'd have come up with You can never tell until you start staining these things for real, but this is more like the shade it will come out:

[quote name='Myke' timestamp='1470337085' post='3105306'] Go with the first one! I've been looking at it and it's really been growing on me! [/quote] It will come out darker in any case, but once it's all finished and got the hardware on, I think the book-matched fancy one will look spectacular

...and with the 'devil's treatment'

[quote name='Myke' timestamp='1470335995' post='3105292'] Have you got other pieces of wood that you're thinking of or is that your main stock? [/quote] This is presently what is going on the back (it will have the thru-neck between the two halves) and I have a one-piece from further down the plank that could be used for the top. Probably a bit less swirly, but that kind of thing.

[quote name='Myke' timestamp='1470331876' post='3105244'] No, no, no, no, no, no! Well maybe. The more I look the better it gets! [/quote] Thing is, it IS going to be red, because that's the one thing that Pete has asked for. So the choice is nondescript but perfectly normal grain, in red.....or something a bit more eye-catching, in red

Something like this (just a photoshop job, JPJ!): What do you reckon?

I put a template over to see how much of the figuring might be lost and where. NOW you can see his horns! Well, I may have to go into hiding for a generation or so, but it's just begging to be stained red

[quote name='Bassmonkey' timestamp='1470323271' post='3105147'] Here's the original colour under the pickguard along with an original owners name and address scratched on it in 1974 Amazing colour change. Nice [/quote] That's really quite something. Have to smile also because I generally use fountain pen ink or calligraphy ink for my stains and folk in the know get quite twitchy (probably with some justification) about the colour fastness. I would happily pitch my red ink against Gibson's commercial stain of the '70s based on this for colour fastness Your bass has real mojo, Bassmonkey. Well done for tracking such a good one down.

[quote name='Bassmonkey' timestamp='1470322684' post='3105140'] Was made in '73. I only got it this year so dunno. Nice though [/quote][quote name='Bassmonkey' timestamp='1470322684' post='3105140'] Was made in '73. I only got it this year so dunno. Nice though [/quote] It's the real deal!