Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Sandberg Basic 5


Apex
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Sandberg saga continues, as I picked up the blue burst basic 5 from BigJim yesterday. He had it from Platypus, who bought it from BassBunny...

I bought it because I wanted to learn more about different basses and sounds. I've only been playing a few years. It was sufficiently different from my HH Peavey and had adjustable string spacing (I know I can't cope with a Fender Jazz, but the Peavey at 15mm at the bridge is a little on the narrow side). The set up and action are superb. It really is lovely to play, and feels like a quality instrument.

With the eq flat I was a little disappointed in the sound to start with. Dull with very little sustain and not much difference mad by the coil tap. Turning up the bass a lot and the treble a little produced a much more interesting growl. (All this on Active.)

So what should I be expecting from this? And what should I be doing to get the best out of it? How much of the info that applies to Stingrays will apply to this?

The spec is

5 String
34 scale
Delano MM pickup
Delano Bridge (adjustable for width)
Noll 3-band pre-amp, (Cut/Boost on Bass/Middle/Treble
Coil Tap switch fitted for Series/Parallel or Single Coil
Passive override option by pulling Vol switch
Zero fret

Not sure of the strings - possibly Elites?

Would really appreciate any advice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the 2 pickup version of this (the Ken Taylor). The tone is naturally a bit darker than the Stingray 5 but I found it paired well with my MarkBass set up. I tended to put the treble to about 3/4 and roll off the mids a bit which cleaned the sound up. I also found the 'flat' position a bit uninspiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='martthebass' post='889020' date='Jul 7 2010, 10:05 PM']I had the 2 pickup version of this (the Ken Taylor). The tone is naturally a bit darker than the Stingray 5 but I found it paired well with my MarkBass set up. I tended to put the treble to about 3/4 and roll off the mids a bit which cleaned the sound up. I also found the 'flat' position a bit uninspiring.[/quote]

Thanks Mtb - just packed up for a band practice tomorrow night, so will give that a whirl and see what it gives me. (I did think about not taking it to a practice until I'd got some really good settings - that thought probably lasted about .5 of a microsecond!! :) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One practice later...

Good sound, popular with the rest of the band but - despite your settings Mtb - I tended to lose the G-string in the mix. I think there was a Stingray thread on the same issue some while back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Apex' post='889956' date='Jul 8 2010, 10:41 PM']One practice later...

Good sound, popular with the rest of the band but - despite your settings Mtb - I tended to lose the G-string in the mix. I think there was a Stingray thread on the same issue some while back.[/quote]

Didn't really notice the 'weak G string effect' with mine but to be honest I'm quite used to losing the G in a heavy mix if things aren't perfectly balanced even with my Status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Apex' post='889014' date='Jul 7 2010, 09:59 PM']So what should I be expecting from this? And what should I be doing to get the best out of it? How much of the info that applies to Stingrays will apply to this?[/quote]

I've got a four string Sandberg Basic and a Stingray. Although they've got the same pickup configuration, they sound very different to my ears.

The Basic is much darker sounding, with a noticeable low mids bias. More of a Warwick sound than a Stingray sound. To get a Stingray tone I tend to cut the mids and boost treble. Its still a lot smoother sound than the fizz/punch you get with a 'ray though.

For me, one of the nicest sounds from the Basic is to simply overide the EQ and run it passive. You get a very usable, airy, passive tone, although no EQ available.

Still a very versatile bass, and an exceptionally playable neck.

Edit - just read Martthebass's post, and I see he's said pretty much the same, but in fewer words! I really should read the whole thread before posting.....

Edited by simon1964
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...