Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Are mutli-effects fundamentally flawed...?


4StringHell
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd rather spend a little extra and get a rackmount effect and midi foot controller - that said, it makes distortion a little more challenging (would have to be a TC G-Major/Force or something else guitar specific). I've got an old boss VF-1 in a vocal rig which I could quite easily employ as a multi-fx, I shall have to give that a blast some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[i]Are mutli-effects fundamentally flawed...?[/i]

Not necessarily - it depends what you expect. Some people never bypass and use a preset with just compression that works as "normal/clean" sound. Usually in the multi-fx units I had I always used preset 0 as "clean" (no effects) and preset 99 (or whatever is the last one) as mute (master=0).

In the Zoom B2.1u, if I remember correctly, it is possible to connect an external switch for total bypass.

The AdrenaLinn III that I reviewed [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=9116"]here[/url] allow the user to assign the desidered function to the footswitches so for instance, the right switch can be the bypass.

So, providing that lack of direct bypass is a flaw (some would say [i]system feature[/i] :)), the answer is "some are, some aren't".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...