jrixn1 Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) . Edited Tuesday at 22:37 by jrixn1 Quote
CookPassBabtridge Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 17 hours ago, jrixn1 said: The cost of insurance is always going to be more than the expected value of loss/damage - the difference is how insurers make money. The shops could be getting a special deal like you say, but I also wonder (and this is just a guess) if they just send them uninsured because of the volume that they're trading. If they are turning over £1,000,000 of basses, it's going to be cheaper to write off £5,000 of lost basses versus paying £10,000 of insurance. It's different if you're an individual and only buying a couple of basses per year - i.e. if you are the unlucky 1 in 100 person whose bass goes missing and can't afford to take a £700 hit because you needed that money this month to fix your broken car etc. Yeah I think you could be right, retailers may be willing to ‘write off’ any damages given the volume of instruments they sell. Perhaps they consider it in their overall pricing and annual turnover. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.