hooky_lowdown

Pretty sure the pickups in the Icon are alnico, I've heard the newer Vintage v4 reissue's (one with painted headstock) have different pickups than the others. 

However, you have one bass which records well and the other I'm guessing sounds good playing live, so I reckon you have GAS for something new or different. You probably don't want to hear this, but you already have a solid setup. But GAS affects us all. Damn you GAS.

Getting a new neck with rosewood fingerboard may be tricky as rosewood is now an endangered wood AFAIK. A decent new neck will cost was much or more than a second hand squire p bass special. So probably easier to just buy a used one, and sell the body to recoup some funds.

Does anyone know what the difference is between the yammie rbx 370 dx and the rbx 374?

53 minutes ago, Pirellithecat said:

Thanks for the info - I'm hoping to replace the neck with a similar one i.e.  jazz profile, 38mm at nut, Rosewood fingerboard, and if I was REALLY lucky, one with a black front to the headstock to match the body. 

In my dreams ....... 

Cool. GLWYS. Any standard Fender sized 63mm wide heel jazz neck will fit (Mexico or US, but not Japan).

1 hour ago, la bam said:

I'd love a warm vintage sound if I'm honest. The kind of classic p bass, flats, svt sound.

I like the sound of the wilkinson on my vintage icon, but there's so many different opinions which they are - wp0b / wpb etc, I'm not sure what they actually are.

Wilkinson's are very decent vintage sounding pickups. The different model / prefixes refer to if they are ceramic or alnico. The cheaper pickups will be ceramic and the slightly more expensive will be alnico. The alnico are the better pickups and do sound better (warmer and more vintage sounding) than ceramics.

Lozz196 is correct, Fender custom shop 62 or the 62 ri's which are essentially the same pickups will be perfect for what you want.

You don't need to remove the neck, just take a tape measure to the front bottom of the neck. I've had several squire p bass specials, and believe they have a standard Fender 63mm pocket.

What type of neck are you thinking of replacing it with, as I have a used Fender spec (63mm) one piece solid maple p neck, can send you pics if interested?

1 hour ago, Skezza said:

Thanks guys This guitar was so cheap a japanese GRECO for £80 I thought ill give it a try.

 

a 30 inch may be my next purchase 

If you like the pj configuration, and looking for an inexpensive short scale, most peeps around here will suggest the squire vm jaguar. If you find a Mustang version all the better.

What sort of music do you play, do you want a vintage or modern sound? My fav p pup is the Fender 62 ri, lots of vintage tone but hotter than an original 62 pup, and a lot less expensive.

You can use full length strings on a 32 scale. You'll probably find there is not a lot of difference between 34 and 32 inch scale, so possibly won't help your onset artiritus. A short scale (30 inch) would probably benefit you more.

1 hour ago, Skinnyman said:

Thanks Hooky. I’ve been wondering about half rounds for a while and was tempted to try a set - you’ve just saved me £36!

Thats cold comfort to you, I know, but you can take heart from knowing that you’ve just performed a valuable consumer service!

Thanks. I've read things from others who have tried half rounds, but gave little detail about the things or reasons to buy them, like smoothness, finger noise. 

Glad I saved you a few quid. 😀

Been curious about half rounds for a while, so got some as I like the feel of flats and the brighter and articulate sound you get from rounds, and put them on my p bass. What a disappointment! For the price (£36) these strings are a huge let down, way overpriced for what they are.

They have some very thin plastic coating on them, which is fine, but they don't look or feel anywhere as smooth to the touch as flatwounds, as a result there's still a fair amount of finger noise, I would say half rounds give a minimal reduction (around 10%) less audible finger noise than standard rounds, they sound just like nickel rounds.

As I had a new set of Fender nickel rounds laying around I thought I would wrap some fine sandpaper around them and rub them down, removing any debris with some alcohol wipes. Put them on the same p bass last night and they sound and feel exactly the same (only less sticky) as the half rounds, costing £20 less than the Daddario's.

I don't know if the Daddario's will last longer than the rubbed down Fender nickel rounds, time will tell, even if they don't I will do the classic - soak them in alcohol. But for what the half rounds cost I feel they definitely not worth the money.

Is everything stock?

Waiting now for prices of Hondo's to rocket on fleabay!

20 hours ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said:

Well, I've changed my mind on feedback removal. Not so easy apparently.

Some f**ktard bought a children's game which I duly sent. Checked into my account this morning to find a negative. I've not had a single message or request for refund from the buyer. Just had a heated conversation with eBay and they're not budging at all.

They want me to send the buyer a message! What the f**k for? The damage is done!

How can it be fair that I'm given no opportunity to make the situation right for the buyer before I receive negative. Serial neutral/negative feedback giver as well. What a tosser.

I'm with you mate. I've had issues with eBay feedback. I too complained to eBay with no help from them.

1 hour ago, fleabag said:

I thought Kay was a catalogue company, like Freemans and others. Days of old. I remember my mum used those catalogues. They sold just about everything

Kay did make high quality upright basses and were a highly regarded brand name, much like old Epiphone, but having sold the name, they started making cheap copies through the 60s to 80s and sold in catalogues. However, any Kay bass before the company name was sold is a quality instrument and probably worth a wedge due to their rarity.

I am a flats guy. I love Chrome's, and I also like fender flats, I always use 45-100, however having used several sets of both on p basses, I've always found the tension for both to be similar, feel similar with Chrome's being slightly smoother. Chrome's sound brighter and warmer when both are new.

All strings will dull in time, so not sure judging both at different stages of use is very scientific?

17 minutes ago, ubit said:

I had no idea that they made Ric copies. That’s interesting. It does look as though it’s just not right but for £300? Why not? 

Hook famously said his Ric copy was the worst bass he ever played.

2 minutes ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said:

What gives with the nuts on the strings at the bridge?

So the silks don't run over the saddles.

If you want a muddy sound, just roll off the tone on whatever bass you use. You'll thank me later!

I'm a little confused. What's the difference between a tri fade burst and a regular sunburst?

2 hours ago, jrixn1 said:

Is this possibly an Antique Burst "Precision Bass Special", which came before the "Vintage Modified" series?

Yes, these are 'standard' squier basses which were pre VM. Having owned both, the VM is far superior.

Logo on headstock is totally wrong, the logo is 70s style and the font for the words Telecaster Bass is wrong also, it's called Sans Serif and would never have been used in 50s or 60s.

1 minute ago, Earbrass said:

Marketing is marketing, and it's all b/s.

This is true. I used to work in advertising and marketing, and we make things up (called being creative) to entice people to desire something or value it higher than its true worth.

2 hours ago, phsycoandy said:

thanks for the info, so perhaps 91 then not 81 who knows!

81 would have been pre squier.

3 hours ago, troubadour said:

VJ74 a very reasonable 4.0 kg, V4 a disappointingly (for me) heavy 4.2 kg. Both nicely balanced though.

Interesting, the p being heavier than the j. Both are cool basses.