Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

TheLowDown

Member
  • Posts

    526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TheLowDown

  1. 6 hours ago, Fishfacefour said:

    Will this play havoc with the muscle memory?

    I wouldn't worry about it. I switch between long scale and short scale and 4, 5 and 6 string. If you switch regularly it quickly becomes second nature. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. He may just need asome space at this time. I know that when people have been in a similar position they may find any attention a little unwanted. 

    • Like 1
  3. Nice looking bass, he's done a good job. Given what you've mentioned about the strings, it's unlikely you will be wanting to restring it with a high C string rather than a low B, eh. A high C string always sounds more lyrical to me on a fretless, the low B string I find considerably less useful compared to on a fretted.

    • Like 1
  4. 9 hours ago, Basso said:

    The main point of the post is that fatter necks actually are better suited for proper playing technique (thumb in the middle of the neck, playing with tip of curved fingers). The distance from the pushing fingers gets smaller to the string and the hand gets a better grip or “strength” thanks to a more solid contact to the actual neck. Less “air playing” equals less distance, more strength, less movement with the resulting increased control.
    Believe me: thin necks are not “faster” or “smoother” or “better” for anyone but someone with REALLY small hands aka: children. Rest of you: go practice!

    (and burn all those slim necked basses).

    I've heard of this before. Ideally, it is said, the hand should be an open position as if you're gently holding a tennis ball which allows for the hand muscles to be at their most relaxed. With shallow necks, this allegedly puts some strain on the muscles of the palm over time. Necks that have some depth being less likely to result in strain because they retain the open hand position more.

    Sounds plausible, maybe a physiotherapist has more insight.

     

     

     

  5. Apart from custom made, I would doubt that there is any better QC on £2000 compared to £200. I think people naturally assume that the more expensive, the better the QC and the more the human touch. We like to believe that if we pay more, then it has better quality. With CNCs and the shift in manufacturing centres to the East, I don't think that philosophy applies any more, but companies still need ways to differentiate their products to be able to charge more for different ranges.

     

    In the past it was always China that was saddled with making the lower end(hence the previously bad rep of "made in China"), but that is no longer the case. As Kev above quite rightly says, the quality of the product is dependent upon what the big company pays - if they pay for a top product, then they get a top quality product. 

     

    Because of the shift in manufacturing centres and expertise and large scale automation, I would far rather have a bass made in Indonesia or China than the USA or Europe, both for quality and value. 

    • Like 4
  6. It's why I avoid Fender(and Squier, their budget range of overpriced products). It's how a lot of named brands work in different sectors. They get lazy, push their prices to the max and think their brand name will do their job for them.

    Lesser known or uncoming brands try much harder.

    • Like 1
  7. I do all my practice on 6 string bass. My reasoning is that it makes for flexibility and prepares me for being able to play whatever I want to play on 4 string, 5 string or 6 string. A bass is just a tool for a job, so I don't think there's any superiority about them, because all have pros and cons which makes each better for specific scenarios and not so good in others. Using a 6 string rather than a 4 string or vice versa is like choosing between a hammer and a screwdriver.

    • Like 1
  8. For a good B string, I've always thought that it's more about the strings and the setup than the bass including neck construction. Others may disagree.

     

    Personally, I would go with the last expensive, especially if I wasn't trying out all 3 in person. Given that you've said that it was comfy to play(you don't know for sure if the others are, at this point), then you may have a winner.

  9. 2 minutes ago, Chris2112 said:

     

    In terms of flexibility I think a pickup just slightly forward of the bridge position (by maybe 1mm or so) would be best. If you want that 'amp in another room down the hallway' vibe you can either pluck nearer the neck or put a pillow in front of your amp. You can always soften/deaden the sound of a bass with just a bridge pickup but you can never get that great tone on a bass with just a neck pickup. 

    I suppose it depends on what you're wanting to achieve.

  10. I prefer rap when it's fused with other genres such as jazz. Because I'm not much of a rap or lyrics guy, I need some extra spice added to the instrumentals to make it more interesting for me.

     

    Artists that may be seen as rap that I enjoy include: Gang Starr(as mentioned by OP), Guru(particulary his Jazzmattazz albums), US3,  Jazz Liberatorz, Fun Lovin' criminals.

     

    I love this one by FLC, the sax gives it a very jazzy and mellow vibe

     

     

    • Like 2
  11. The HB B45FL is decent. There may well be better or equivalent ones for more money or around that price point, but I don't think you can go wrong with it for the price. 

     

    I would also go along with the unlined because the only visual clue that is important are the side dots rather than craning his neck over the fretboard. If anything, my lined fretless requires extra and unnecessary mental processing when I look down at the side dots because I then have to do some spatial calculations to work out where the actual fret should be, whereas on the unlined this isn't the case. The only practical advantage(IMO) of the lined is that there is far more choice, so if he wants to go the 5 string route the lined may be the better option.

    • Like 3
  12. In my teens and 20s it was all about rock, indie rock, and a very brief teenage fling with new wave. Now I rarely listen to rock, because it's like no longer having an appetite for Mars bars whatsoever after eating 10,000 of them.

     

    In my teens and 20s I hated hiphop for the lyrics, was indifferent to jazz because I didn't understand it or even try to, and was even more indifferent to country just because. When you're young you're much more influenced by image, but when you're older it's irrelevant.

    I listen mostly to music that feeds my bassy cravings like RnB, funk, jazz, pop(gotta love the likes of hallucinate by Dua Lipa) now and again, some hiphop and even some country for its wonderful simplicity. None of which I would have ever considered in my earlier years.

×
×
  • Create New...