Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bridgehouse

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    2,686
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    160

Posts posted by Bridgehouse

  1. [quote name='bassix' timestamp='1489672121' post='3258842']
    Here's where its stated. EXL's..

    https://uk.yamaha.com/en/products/musical_instruments/guitars_basses/el_basses/bb/specs.html#product-tabs
    [/quote]

    Pretty definitive that ;)

  2. [quote name='bassix' timestamp='1489671870' post='3258836']
    I think they are D'Addario XL if I remember correctly, it states what they are for certain on the site.
    [/quote]

    If they are Yamaha own stock I bet they are made by D'addario anyway.. and XLs would be the closest match

  3. [quote name='Osiris' timestamp='1489668897' post='3258788']


    Just had a quick look, they look interesting.
    Just out of interest, what it is you preferred about the Eich over the D800?
    [/quote]

    Good question. Well, I went for the T1000 - I suspect the T900 is closer to the D800, but in brief:

    - To get the same functionality, I would have needed the 800+ (fx loop etc) and it was well north of £1000
    - Tone wise, I felt the EICH just had more range and tweak in them - specially the T1000, and the built in compressor was nice..
    - The killer for me was the flexibility of the T1000 for what was broadly the same cash as the D800+ - you get 2 500w class D amps in the T1000 - so you can mix and match cabs with different ohms, you can set the volume for each power amp separately to balance cabs out, or you can bridge them for the full 1000w.

    To me, the EICH sounded more hifi, more rounded and more complete as a tone compared to the D800 though the same Vanderkley cab...

  4. [quote name='Osiris' timestamp='1489667224' post='3258767']
    There's some great advice and information above guys, cheers, I really appreciate it.

    There seems to be a consensus that the TH 350 will be probably enough for my needs, a mixture of pub gigs and wedding/party type gigs.

    In terms of volume, we're perhaps not the quietest band on the average pub gig, but we're by no means the loudest either.
    My gigging cab is a 4 ohm, 600 watt, Tecamp M212, which according to the specs has a sensitivity of 101 dB (although I have no idea if that's good, bad or average!).
    Bass is almost always through the PA too unless we're in a smaller venue when we try and keep things down anyway.
    Tonally, I tend to leave the eq flat with maybe subtle adjustments to suit the room if need be, and I like a bit of warmth to the tone too, not overdrive but a touch warmth/hair/grit whatever you wish to call it.

    Is the 350 likely to be man enough for this? Form what a few of you have said above, I think that it probably will be.

    It took me all of about 20 seconds fiddling with the TH 500 to get a sound that I liked and think would work well with the band and I love the simplicity of it.

    The only thing preventing me ordering one right now is that I'm hoping to try the Mesa Boogie Subway D800 at the weekend to see how I get on with that :)
    [/quote]

    If you are considering the D800 then have a look at the EICH range as well - I preferred the EICH to the D800....

  5. Well, yes I sold a lot of gear recently and had to spend the money on something!

    It's definitely loud. Very loud. Most importantly the headroom is massive - With the cab taking 1200w you can pump all 1000w from the EICH in bridge mode into it and it laps it up.

    And the Vanderkley cabs are nice - these new ones do seem to be really rather good. I'm liking having a cab that will take a big output head without having to be careful how much I turn it up..

  6. [quote name='largo' timestamp='1489532786' post='3257784']
    Cheers, reason I ask is my dad has a '73 Precision bought from new & its finish is checked to an inch of its life & the paint is also worn off big style! Yours looks like a new bass in comparison. Great looking bass by the way.
    [/quote]

    I've got a 74 P as well and there's nary a check on it. It's Olympic White - maybe it's something to do with the colour?

    The 64 is a one owner, and has been mollycoddled (despite the dings) so I suspect it's just had a relatively easy life..?

  7. [quote name='largo' timestamp='1489525784' post='3257714']
    Thread hijack alert.... can someone please tell me why some of the early Fender basses get checking on the finish whereas others don't?
    [/quote]

    Just before anyone else does answer - this one does have checking on it - you can't see it in the photos but it does. It's so fine that it's really hard to get the camera to pick it up.

    But it's there tho..

  8. [quote name='Norris' timestamp='1489352888' post='3256322']
    Don't get the Fender. I don't want anybody else getting such fabulous tone in such a compact and lightweight combo as I do. Nothing to see here. Look elsewhere

    :D
    [/quote]

    Don't worry - I didn't. See my other thread.

    EICH T1000 1000w head, and Vanderkley 1200w 4ohm 2x10 cab...

    You're safe. There's no way they will sound like your Fender! ;)

  9. Jack - just looked at the specs for the T900. You're right - the EQ for it is different. So, I'd say you have to hear it for yourself - the T1000 is different. I like the EQ on the T1000 from what I've heard so far and the two boost controls seem to be very flexible. YMMV.

  10. [quote name='Jack' timestamp='1489332153' post='3256082']
    I'm really interested in those EICH amps, specifically I think the 900 for me.

    One things that's put me off (I'm yet to hear them in fairness) is the bass and treble controls seem to be at ludicrous frequencies. Who's producing 30Hz or 8kHz? I'd be really keen to read your review, especially concerning the eq. Enjoy the new amp, very jealous!
    [/quote]

    On the T1000, the Lo band of the EQ is at around 70hz, and the Hi band is around 5khz. (Lo Mid is 250hz and Hi Mid is 800hz)

    I think you might be thinking about the Bass Boost and High Boost switches - the Bass Boost gives 12db at 30hz, and the High Boost 12db at 10khz.

    Both switches are totally separate to the EQ controls but do make a tangible difference the the sound - fuller, rounder, deeper and a bit more sparkly (to taste, of course!)

  11. [quote name='gary mac' timestamp='1489324819' post='3256011']
    Yes, I've encountered that at least it's a nice simple fix. Well done
    [/quote]

    Thanks - I thought I was going a bit mad at first. Once I had the bridge off I thought "Aha, that's the culprit"

    Was glad it was an easy fix! Didn't want to face the prospect of getting a soldering iron anywhere near an untouched 64!

  12. [quote name='gary mac' timestamp='1489321604' post='3255974']
    What a good looking rig. Bet the 64 sounds mighty fine through that.
    [/quote]

    Funny story there..

    I tried the 74 through it when I got home. It was as quiet and hum free as anything I've ever heard before. Silent. Even with quite a bit of gain up. With the tweeter on full there was a bit of hiss, but winding it down it was super quiet. I was really impressed.


    Plugged the 64 in and there was some hum. Not a huge amount, but clearly some hum. Oh oh I thought - grounding issue. Out came the multimeter - checked the continuity on the 74 for reference, all 100% perfect.

    The 64 however - perfect from pots and pups to the jack, but the strings weren't. Hmmmm.

    There was continuity from the bridge ground solder on the pot to the jack, but not from the bridge and strings.

    Strings off, and pulled the bridge. It was clear I was the first person to pop the bridge off since new (!) - and there it was, the ground wire bare end had sunk into the lacquer over time and wasn't making a good connection. Moved it, tightened it up and reseated the bridge. Guess what? 100% continuity and absolutely no hum. Clean as a whistle. Sounds superb.

    You live and learn huh?

  13. Well, following the advice on my 'what combo?' thread, I went to Bass Direct today to try some out.

    Took about 2 minutes to get totally distracted by the Vanderkley cabs on display. They had the new 1200w 4 ohm 2x10 right there on display.

    Tried a lot of heads through it - best by miles for my kind of tone was the EICH T1000. Crikey it was articulate. Clean, with gain, boosted mids, whatever - just damned articulate and so much 'pop'.

    At the wattage rating of the amp, I can run it in bridge mode, putting out the full 1000w at 4 ohms straight into the cab. Got it home. Put the gain on about 3ish, and master on 4-ish. With the 64 P on about 75% volume I could have had pictures and plaster off the walls. Flippin' eck.

    Best bit? Cab is 37lbs and fits in the boot lovely. Head is negligible in weight - in a nice EICH gig bag. All up about the same as the Mark Bass combo or Fender Rumble 500.

    Ok, so I blew the budget massively, but I just couldn't resist......

  14. [quote name='Beer of the Bass' timestamp='1489084978' post='3254290']
    I get confused about what's considered high. I think of my bass as being set quite low at the moment, at 2mm (G) to 2.5mm (E) at the 12th fret. But reading through this thread, that might be considered high? I think double bass has messed up my perception of this stuff...
    [/quote]


    That's not high. High is putting your finger on the string and not really knowing exactly which fret it's going to land on 2 seconds later...

  15. Ok. I need to consider amp and cab as well then.

    Is there any good reason I should look at the more expensive Mesa subway/darkglass etc route, or should I stick with the barefaced cab and standard 500w class D style head?

  16. Yes, you're right - a list of everyone's current rigs ;)

    If I went cab and head I think I'd rather go more down the line of tone I prefer. If I did that I know I'd end up darkglass microtubes or Mesa subway D800 and then the budget is shot!

  17. [quote name='Bridgehouse' timestamp='1488925370' post='3253052']
    I did wonder if a small head and cab would be a better choice, but I suspect this thread would be 12 pages long already if I'd have asked:

    "Which small lightweight head and cab for under £1k for normal gigging duties with FX loop?"
    [/quote]

    Having just said that - without wanting to break the internet with traffic, and by way of comparison, if I did go for a head/cab setup rather than a combo, for under £1k or so, and sticking roughly to the same weight/portability of the Rumble 500/MB 121 - what would you go for?

  18. [quote name='Lw.' timestamp='1488924549' post='3253039']
    In a choice between the fenders & markbass the fenders would win every time for me - I thought the markbass sound crap when I've used them (could just be me though).

    Tbh if it were me I'd get a small cab & head - so many more options for equal size/weight!
    [/quote]

    I did wonder if a small head and cab would be a better choice, but I suspect this thread would be 12 pages long already if I'd have asked:

    "Which small lightweight head and cab for under £1k for normal gigging duties with FX loop?"

×
×
  • Create New...