Dan Dare

There's a chap in the market place selling two Vanderkley 1x12s for what looks a reasonable price. Worth a look, imho (no, it isn't anyone I know).

I found the same on my old J bass. The pickups had become microphonic, so I had them wax potted. Improved things no end. I didn't notice any loss of highs when I got them back. I wonder if the lost airy quality you refer to was in fact caused by the pickups being microphonic.

On ‎10‎/‎04‎/‎2019 at 09:50, Bigwan said:

Ashdown use the same B&O ICE amp modules as Aguilar (and Darkglass... and GK... and Genz Benz... and Fender... and Traynor... and... and...), but they're more likely to look after you!

This is key. It isn't the parts, but the attitude of the manufacturer that counts. Any electrical part can fail, so you need a manufacturer that is prepared to help if things do go wrong, which Ashdown certainly is.

If the main problem is the cab (not surprising - no 4x12 could truly be described as "lightweight"), why not keep the head and investigate smaller/lighter alternatives? I switched from two large cabs to several smaller ones. The beauty is that they are scalable - I take as few/many as needed for a job. I guess as you use a 4x12 that you need to make some noise on occasion. A couple of lightweight modern 1x12s (see the usual suspects/brands recommended on here) should see you right and you can take just one if it's a smaller job.

I wouldn't recommend a combo. Separate head + cabs is more flexible.

On ‎08‎/‎04‎/‎2019 at 11:33, lemmywinks said:

Apparently he's a pro artist and the RRP on this is £650

Almost correct. Substitute the "r" and "o" in pro with a couple of other letters (the second repeated) and it would be spot on. How can a "custom" instrument have a RRP, I wonder?

Gawd, I've seen pick wear before, but nothing like that. It may be worth the start price...

If you're in the MU, you can get cover through them without paying a fortune. £10m in public liability insurance is included in the cost of your sub's, too.

5 hours ago, jrixn1 said:

I basically agree with you - but the counter-argument is that the driver is already making that trip at a cost to himself of (say) 45p per mile, regardless if he gives anyone or no one a lift.  The additional cost of giving someone a lift is not that same 45p per mile.

I'm in a 10-piece band, so people coming from all over the place, and all with differing pre-/post-gig schedules.  Currently, the gig fee is fixed per musician, but then on top the band pay drivers 20p per mile + 5p per passenger per mile.  There are still issues or grey areas; e.g. two drivers who could conceivably share a lift but then who both decide to drive themselves (thus costing the band more in expenses paid out).

Good points. My point was in response to those asking about driving others, not just oneself. Obviously, one would not double up on fuel cost for every passenger carried. If it is feasible for several to share a car, it makes sense for them to do so.

5 hours ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said:

That might be the case if there are non drivers in the band, but in my case, in all the bands I’m in, everyone is capable of driving their own vehicle. I’ll drive the guitarist one week, he’ll drive the me the next, therefore equal wear and tear and that doesn’t need factoring in. Fuel gets paid for and everyone’s happy; plus we get to geek out listening to stuff that would undoubtedly annoy many of the others.

Fair enough. I was not referring to quid pro quo, but to situations where one person always ends up driving others (which does happen in some circumstances). In that case, being picked up, driven to and from the job and delivered home equates to a taxi service and those being ferried should recognise that and give the driver a drink on top of fuel cost. They can always buy a car of their own or take a taxi if they're not happy to do so.

23 hours ago, ped said:

Yep I'm afraid it's the fault of the software upgrade itself rather than a slip up our side. I have passed on our collective displeasure to the company. 

Any suggestions as to how to re-instate it?

ABB's prices are often, erm, on the amusing side. Tbf, he has a business to run and a living to make. I suspect that it you walked in with readies, the prices would turn out to be negotiable.

20 hours ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said:

In my experience, those that drive get fuel covered and the remainder gets an even split.

Not just fuel. Inconvenience, wear and tear, etc need to be factored in - see bassjim's post above.

Why no pic' on my posts any more?

Don't invest in anything you have any feeling for. You need to sell when the time is right to realise the best value from any investment. If you have fine instruments you are fond of, you may not be able to bring yourself to cash them in when you should. Grangur has it right.

1 hour ago, Barking Spiders said:

With his  Christian wholesomeness I'd have thought he'd have gone down a storm south of the Mason Dixon line. 

Nah. Old Cliff may have the required religiosity, but he's too, well, nice. You need to be a bit more crazed about your beliefs to be popular with god botherers in the deep South (and preferably be partial to shooting anything that moves).

It's well worth adding a washer to the shaft of the boom extension pivot. Enables you to tighten the T bar properly and makes it easier to loosen. I do this to all my K&Ms.

18 hours ago, TheGreek said:

I'd be thinking about two 2x10. There are loads of lightweight cabs available that will deliver what you need. Personally I'd recommend VDK but there will be as many recommendations as there are choices.

Must be tough being spoilt for choice..

Good advice. You can take one or both depending on how much nosier you need to make. As for makes, try the usual suspects.

1 hour ago, Fastra said:

May look into some sort of rubber feet things that I can place down under it first.

Have a look at these - https://www.floormats.co.uk/safety-mats-playprotect.

Just got three - one for the bass rig and one each for the PA subs. Heavy, inert rubber. Work well and a fraction of the cost of Gramma pads and similar.

I see it went for £63. About £60 more than its true value

Rather than modify the instrument, why not consider a pedal/external pre? You'll have to do some research/trying out - only you know the sound you're after. That way, you can use the Sandberg as it is when you don't want the more aggressive approach.

5 hours ago, chris_b said:

No. The price is none of your/my/anyone's business. The seller should not have to face trolling over his price.

One man's "trolling" is another's fair comment. If you put something up for public sale, it is everyone's business. If it was advertised privately, you might have a point. 

I agree that it should be no comments or all comments. No in between.

Rather than hack the TE about and risk the fact that replacing the speakers may not work, why not pick up a power amp to drive the BF? Older style (i.e. non class D) used PA power amps are cheap these days.

My local rehearsal room has SVT Pro heads plus 8X10s and although you can feel, as well as hear the bass, the tone is lacking, for me at any rate. Too indistinct, even if the weight is satisfying. My AG700 plus PJB cabs are much more pleasing to my ear. Guess I'm in the minority, too.

Just now, Mykesbass said:

Perhaps constructive rather than positive?

Fair point. Perhaps helpful and constructive. But "a good guy to do business with" (to quote chris_b's example) is not something I would call constructive. Too easy for someone's mates to post that sort of stuff. The one other thing I really object to is "bargain". Some on here are not that experienced/new to the game and could be influenced by that. I've seen used stuff advertised on here at almost new price and not everyone will necessarily be aware of that. If "bargain" or "good price"  is acceptable, so should "too pricey" be.

Caveat emptor, I'm afraid. As Maude says, view the combined total as the price you will pay.