Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

chrisanthony1211

Member
  • Posts

    551
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chrisanthony1211

  1. This goes down as a very tentative feeler.
    This is without doubt the best sounding amp I have ever played through, I've played three medium sized venues with ease with this, however the last time I took it out it got a little dink on a corner (actually a tiny dink which you can see just above the A on Ampeg), but it was enough to make me leave this in my front room as a rather extravagant practice amp!
    It's not the easiest thing to transport, in fact it's rather awkward, there are metal studs on the back suggesting that you can lay it down however I don't like the amount of pressure it puts on the head brackets so always stand it up in the car.
    I would consider a trade for a Mesa boogie walkabout which is something I'd feel happier gigging with, with cash my way, let me know.

    [URL=http://s1366.photobucket.com/user/chrisanthony1611/media/image_zpsvsfenudl.jpeg.html][IMG]http://i1366.photobucket.com/albums/r776/chrisanthony1611/image_zpsvsfenudl.jpeg[/IMG][/URL]

    This is a very expensive reissue of the classic Ampeg B-15, it has two channels, one based on the 1964 circuit and one based on the 1966 circuit, the 1964 being 25 watts and the 1966 the full 30 watts which may appear somewhat modest, however these are Ampeg Valve watts that we're talking about!

    [URL=http://s1366.photobucket.com/user/chrisanthony1611/media/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zps3fqw6afl.jpeg.html][IMG]http://i1366.photobucket.com/albums/r776/chrisanthony1611/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zps3fqw6afl.jpeg[/IMG][/URL]

    [URL=http://s1366.photobucket.com/user/chrisanthony1611/media/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsuw9cz0fx.jpeg.html][IMG]http://i1366.photobucket.com/albums/r776/chrisanthony1611/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsuw9cz0fx.jpeg[/IMG][/URL]

    Where most combos I've had you really have to think twice when the volume knob gets towards 2/3 o'clock, this thing just breezes on past all the way to maximum, and it will give you great tones and more volume all the way through, with just a touch of overdrive and break up as you get towards the top end. I found that I would need the eq so that the bass was about 3 o'clock and treble at 1 o'clock for a nice fat sound.

    [URL=http://s1366.photobucket.com/user/chrisanthony1611/media/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zps4lwkr7tp.jpeg.html][IMG]http://i1366.photobucket.com/albums/r776/chrisanthony1611/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zps4lwkr7tp.jpeg[/IMG][/URL]

    Not only does this thing look super sexy, but it sounds it too, it's perfectly able to gig small to medium venues and of course you can drop it down to 4 ohms and throw an extension cabinet at it if needed!

  2. I bought some FS's yesterday and my first impression is that they give a bit of a phatter sound.....there's a little more tension, which I quite like, so a little tweak of the truss was required, but overall, phat, higher tension, very silky smooth on the fingers, im impressed.

  3. Towards the end of 1964, Fender starting using pearloid fret markers, below are the fret markers from my June 64 which has the "clay" (or whatever it was) fret markers.

    [URL=http://s1366.photobucket.com/user/chrisanthony1611/media/IMG_1261_zpsbiiueyjs.jpg.html][IMG]http://i1366.photobucket.com/albums/r776/chrisanthony1611/IMG_1261_zpsbiiueyjs.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

    Here are the pearloid ones from the December 1964 Precision that I'm selling. It still has the clay on the top dots though, they didn't go until 65 I think...

    [URL=http://s1366.photobucket.com/user/chrisanthony1611/media/IMG_1262_zpskuytk52j.jpg.html][IMG]http://i1366.photobucket.com/albums/r776/chrisanthony1611/IMG_1262_zpskuytk52j.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

×
×
  • Create New...