Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

HazBeen

Member
  • Posts

    3,146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HazBeen

  1. 26 minutes ago, Geek99 said:

    I look at your angled neck transition there (which you wouldn’t see on a fender) and I’m reminded of the story about the designer of the spitfire putting the chord on the wing joint simply because it looked right rather than for any objective engineering reason at all 

    You missed it.... It actually is function dictating form. The body (where the neck meets body) is angled to ensure better access to the 21st fret (line).

    By making the neck cavity and neck heel follow that angle, ensures that both sides of the neck heel have the same length and can accommodate 3 bolts either side. Impossible if neck heel and cavity were “Fender straight”.

  2. 1 hour ago, Hellzero said:

    Harry, may I ask you why you don't use your router for the deep cavities like the neck pocket or, here, the control ... cavity ?

    I've always used a router for this, in multiple passes, of course. To me, it's easier and faster than drilling holes first.

    You certainly have a very good reason for this way of working, but each time I'm watching your great work, I'm wondering why...

    And as too, like me, don't take it the wrong way. 😉

    I have found that I have significantly fewer router mishaps if I drill out most of the wood first and then just route the edges and last few mm depth. It is as simple as that. I know that many just us a router, but this works for me and thus have had no reason to change the approach.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. 14 minutes ago, SpondonBassed said:

    That's going to be twangy.  You'll need extra tough callouses if you routinely play above the pup.

    Interesting.

    Not really mate. As it is still more forward than the single Bart humbucker I have in the other fretless I built or the bridge pickup on a jazz and no issues there.
     

    I went with the 5 mm back to get a bit more crisp attack, but the placement will ensure enough warm roundness too.

    • Like 1
  4. On 06/10/2020 at 18:27, Bassdude BE said:

    Had the fretted 4 & 5 string en fretless 6 string version of this,  excellent basses all of them and they probably had the best playability of all the >200 basses I´ve owned so far, Keith Roscoe knows how to build a good bass for sure! ;) 

    Oh no, a sufferer of SBAS (ake Serial Bass Acquisition Syndrome)..... a dangerous disease.

    • Haha 2
  5. Hi all,

    Having been bitting by the building bug again I am already dreading finishing my current fretless 5 build (ETA end of next week). After that I only have some modifications to do on my Streamer and Bogart and really do not need anything else myself.

    Oh no......!

    So, does anybody need something built? Small or large? A bass, just a body, neck, finger ramp, custom pick guard, anything goes really. 

    I am a hobby builder without any commercial interest, I just like building and/or modding basses and I have invested in a decent workshop to scratch the itch.

    So in case you want to give it a go......

    I will charge materials and parts at documented cost (upfront) and a pre-agreed fixed fee (after completion) dependent on what I am building just to cover workshop cost, tools, food and drink and such whilst I am building for you.

    PM me if you want to give it a go.

    • Like 4
  6. 1 hour ago, Andyjr1515 said:

    Great job.  Those ferrules look fine to me.  Don't forget that I am lining up only 4 in much the same space. My dimensional errors will be hidden to the eye - and that's something you can't do when they are pretty much touching each other.

    Appreciate the comment.

    • Like 1
  7. The great thing about this phase of a build is that you can see progress very clearly.

    - Neck now flush with body

    - Neck thread insert installed

    - Ferrules for neck bolts installed

    - Neck bolted on to test it

    Weight, with cavity for battery, pickups and controls still to be done, a tad above 3800 grams.

    I think since I am installing a few bits as well, weight will end up at 3850. Not bad.

     

    8C9116A5-BB0E-4481-8849-7943247210B3.jpeg

    B4303E75-A232-476C-ACBC-53D7D5DEB356.jpeg

    9E1E16DA-D45B-4CEC-9F28-5F2EB5F19F68.jpeg

    641508A9-0A96-4D4C-8F0D-22A9BA66698A.jpeg

    F3BD7E3F-56C4-4F30-AE30-58BD7150AA21.jpeg

    • Like 4
  8. Neck is in! Now I have the pocket depth right, I may sand the bit sticking out (about 1.5mm) flush with the body. But to be frank it doesn’t bother me, so may just leave as it for added strength.

    Also fiddled with the bridge a little, to better follow the taper. Worked well.

    Oh and stripped a screw......not quite sure how to get it out, but I will think of something.

     

    ED6B7C75-025F-4332-B4DF-15B45068E8BB.jpeg

    • Like 4
  9. 3 hours ago, SpondonBassed said:

    Good work.

    It illustrates how individual bridges need careful laying out.  In particular, the taper from the nut to the bridge must be quite difficult to measure and cater for.  I'm bearing that in mind for when I use those myself.

    Thanks.
     

    Whilst the Hipshot Triple Lock system is clearly a very stable solution, that accommodates string through body (not that I’d want that perse) it is a dog to install.

    You need to align just right to get the taper nut to bridge right. But unlike other individual saddle bridges, with these because there is a bolt through the body, you need to drill perfectly straight as well.
     

    Something my cheap donkey pillar drill almost cannot achieve....... hate it with a vengeance.

    End result is pretty much perfect on the top, on the back/flip side I have to admit the alignment is pretty decent, but not perfect. I will snap a pic to illustrate next time I am in my workshop.

    All in all I am happy, considering my overall building experience, tools and general “make it up as you go” approach to building. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...