Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Stacker

Member
  • Posts

    1,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stacker

  1. [quote name='Beer of the Bass' timestamp='1379259042' post='2210445']
    It's odd, I thought the usual thing in pro sound would be to run a DI before the amp in addition to miking the speaker. Surely if they'd been doing that, the sound guys could have turned up the DI fader to FOH and put some in the sidefills within seconds of the amp going down? I wonder if the Soundgarden bassist is one of these guys who is unusually insistent about not having a DI there at all?
    [/quote]

    THIS is how it should have gone! There is clearly a monitor in front of the bassist and, in-ears or not, he would have been getting some of his sound down those from the DI/monitor desk feed. The fact that there was no bass after the amps went down points to no DI. Bad call, whoever made that choice!

  2. [quote name='JTUK' timestamp='1379842017' post='2217180']
    Yep..it is their job to get the sound delivered to where it needs to go.
    Having an amp fail isn't an option...and they had a backup, apparently. It may well happen but it shouldn't matter in the grand scheme
    of things in getting the bass out front or on stage.

    Anything more than a tech spending a few seconds on it is a total fail...
    [/quote]

    The sound guys cannot be held responsible for backline gear failing; that is the domain of the the backline techs! That said, if there was no DI before the amp rigs, then the person who made that choice, whether it be one of the sound-crew or the bassist himself, is the one to blame. I have never, in all my days, heard of sound crew being responsible for backline fails!

  3. [quote name='Rick's Fine '52' timestamp='1379421249' post='2212428']
    This.

    This is the issue I have with fender these days. If they call a Jazz RI a '66 (A year specifically known for having lollipos, and dots and binding), then it has to be that, otherwise, why dont they call it a '68, that way they have nothing to worry about, they can get away with regular 70's style tuners that the japs use anyway, and block necks.

    Like the early Custom Shop J's being called a 1960 on the certs, and having 3 knobs...i could go on...

    most annoying!!
    [/quote]
    I'm with you 100% on this. The '60/'62 thing annoys me even more

  4. Doesn't sound like the B4, which had Vol, Pan, and a tone control that is, in fact, just a low pass filter. It also had a mini-toggle for swapping between boosted or cut tines chosen by the pre-amp in the rear. Doesn't sound like a B2, either! B4 serials began with the year date. Pix would be of help.

×
×
  • Create New...