Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

stereoplayer

Member
  • Posts

    292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by stereoplayer

  1. 7 minutes ago, funkydoug said:

    Thanks for the info @stereoplayer

    Not sure i follow what you mean about the screw on the bottom of the pickup ... how does that affect how they fit? Genuine question, I'm thinking of getting some, or at least a bridge one.

    Thanks, Doug.

    The original Schecter PU’s didn’t use covers.  They use a short screw which goes thru the bottom plate of the Pu. The Bardens mount the same way. Although the Bardens don’t need covers(at least the ones I had), they are a sealed Pu.

    Much like these Brantley PUs that I had custom ordered . These are tapped PUs I had custom made for a walnut build I’m doing. These PUs will not be getting covers.

    28BFB04A-AF00-448B-970F-EB38CE35DDDE.jpeg

    F0AB4524-957D-4924-A448-B9A905C7C90D.jpeg

    EDAB9C3A-0FE1-425B-87CA-0CE3F77143AA.jpeg

    • Like 1
  2. 56 minutes ago, funkydoug said:

    Very nice looking bass.

    Can I ask, what did you think of the Barden J pickup? Not heard one but I can see the benefits of a hum cancelling blade ... and it looks so cool too!

    Cheers,

    Doug.

    Overall, I have no problems with the Bardens.  The are powerful, I I thought they have lots of “punch”.  
    I bought them because I had one of my original Schecter pu’s fail.  The Bardens were the only ones that fit the same way as my originals,  the screws are  on the bottom  flange of the Pu.  
     

    I think you would like them. Powerful was my impression.

  3. On 28/03/2021 at 11:11, Geek99 said:

    Possibly I confused your build another active one, apologies 

    No problem,  I’m making this similar to my other main player. Wired stereo with tapped PU’s with  3-way switches.

     

    B7408D2E-DBD5-4473-B861-DCFCC35026CB.jpeg

×
×
  • Create New...