Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

rwillett

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,531
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by rwillett

  1. It's pretty good when the back is as beautiful as the front. Rob
  2. I already have a Lake Placid blue MIJ 97 Fender Jazz but this is gorgeous and actually looks better then mine. Thankfully you are about as far away me as you can be and still be in England. Why somebody hasn't come along and taken this off you, I have no idea. I'd be checking what the kids are worth these days to raise some cash. I suppose you don't want to swap it for a stroppy 14 year old? Sadly we aren't allowed to apprentice them to chimney sweeps otherwise I'd have done that. I'd hate to sell this guitar. Rob
  3. That tape would be brilliant if he wanted to swing from the guitar underneath a helicopter whilst flying through New York. You could probably use that tape to hold the neck on without any bolts. You might even hold the helicopter together. May I respectfully, in defence to @TheGreek and his clearly vastly superior experience to my own, suggest a low adhesive double sided tape. Search for "low tak double sided tape" on Amazon and take your pick. Rob
  4. I apologise and I will withdraw rob
  5. People misunderstand how long it takes to set a CNC machine up. I built a CNC machine as a lock down project (see here https://forum.v1e.com/t/new-build-in-clapham-north-yorkshire-uk/16519) so have some experience here. I am not a professional in this area (or any other area 😀) It took a long time to build the CNC, but it takes an awful long time to design something that isn't just a simple engraving. If I wanted to do a house sign, thats pretty easy. Cutting space for pickups would be relatively easy as well. Anything that is complicated, such as the guitar above, could take a long, long time to design and get right. If they told me, it took 50 - 100 days to design and test, redesign and test, I wouldn't be at all surprised. I would expect them to create an awful lot of saw dust as well, I certainly did. A CNC machine makes sense in some areas, but it is not a cheap machine to buy (good ones are over £100K), they are not cheap to run, you tend to need a dedicated machinest, not cheap to design for, it takes real skill. Routing out pockets for pickups is fine, that work of beauty above is very difficult. I'm not bad with Fusion 360 and have designed some reaonably complex stuff, which tends to be square and lots of straight lines, but I wouldn't even know where to start in that guitar. This took over six months to design, test, redesign, retest. It's a magnetic, modular dust show for collecting waste from a CNC. it uses magnets to hold things together. It didn't work very well 🤐 Circa $8,000 doesn't sound that bad to be honest. Not cheap, but you pays your money and takes your choice. Thanks Rob
  6. That's really nice of you all. I have a slight tear in my eye. Thanks Rob
  7. The honeycomb doesn’t have lots of perimeter or infill. It’s 20% infill , 0.2mm speed setting. Still 22 hours 😒
  8. Just had a quick look at printing it, this one piece is a day. This is nearly three days to print. Took me 30 mins simply to get it to fit. This piece is approx 750g, so around £15 of a reasomable PETG or PLA filament. Will look, but its a lot of printing. Rob
  9. Small incremental changes, lower the gap distance, round off the edges would be two improvements that come to mind Anyway, they are in the post, Rob
  10. I've looked at that and thought Mmmmm..... My problem is I get easily distracted by new shiny blingy things, or just anything really. I have a search on eBay at the moment for the parts for this, basically a decent neck and the rest I'll wing it. A reasonable bridge, and some cheap pickups. The article used a Harley Benton as a doner kit of parts. No idea if they are any good. It's pretty simple to print, thought it will take some time. At the end of the day though, are you going to have a better than £250 Telecaster? It will be different which is always good, but better than a basic Squier? Anyway we're going off topic. Rob
  11. @TheGreek V2 are in the post now Lets not live on our laurels (which is rather apt I think) Rob
  12. Wow, that is work of art. I have no idea how it plays and TBH, I wouldn't care. Just seeing how much one of my kidneys is worth.... Back shortly.
  13. There are a number of programs that you need to master to be able to do 3d printing. As with all software, some programs are easy and some are really complicated. Simple 3d printing, e.g. simple blocks and curves can be done using quite simple software, more complicated stuff requires a good design program, a decent 3d slicer and the ability to think in 3d dimensions. However none of the programs are impossible to master and to learn how to use them, though all require a certain amount of time to be put in. Tye more time you put in, the more you get out. I have put more time into 3d printing than to playing the bass, so I'm less bad at 3d printing than playing (it's all relative). I use Fusion 360 as my main design program. I think I have tried every free version and every demo for 3d design software. However my tests might vary from a few hours to a few days. I do not claim to be an expert in any of them, just more familar with one or two.Depending on what you want to do, you may get away with simpler programs but a decent 3d design program takes time to learn. I gave up on F360 a few times as it's sometimes very odd to use. However the more time I put in, the better I got. The advantage of F360 is a it's a full-on professional 3d design system and is specifically targeted at that audience. The disadvantage of F360 is a it's a full-on professional 3d design system and is specifically targeted at that audience. It's big, it can do anything but you have to learn to use it. You will not learn it in a weekend or even a month unless you are very good. t took my 3-4 months before I became familar enough not to tear my hair out in fristration. Thats not full time, thats a few hours a week. I strongly suspect that any other design program at F360 level will be just as complicated. Once you have F360 working and there are a lot of videos and the community help is very good, you design your stuff, and here's the pickup surrounds I did for @TheGreek You do a simple extrustion to get some depth to it and you get this You export this STL file to a 3d slicer for conversion from STL into a fileformat that a 3d printer uses. All a 3d printer does, is play battleships in 3 dimensions extruding out thin lines of plastic filament. You can control just about every single apsect of everything when printing, from the speed, the width of the lines, the temperature, the bed temperature to parameters that I have no idea what they do. I use PrusaSlicer as I have two Prusa MK3S+ printers which are probably considered high end prosumer devices. I used to have a Creality Ender 3 pro which is entry level and is very good. The Prusa's are a lot better but 4-5x the price each. Anybody starting should get a cheap printer and learn, you can pick them up for less than £200 now. PrusaSlicer converts the file you have loaded into gcode files that the printer understands. It also sends the output file to either an SD card that you manually insert into the printer or to something like Octoprint which is a network print server for 3d printers. The 3d printer will then work its way from the bottom of the object upwards and lay down a thin layer (e.g. 0.2mm) of filament as told. When doing the design you ned to think about overhangs and where support is needed, so sometimes you print the object in an unusual orientation to avoid an overhang. This is easier to demonstrate than to explain and once you've seen it, you understand The rings above took a few hours as I did them at a higher quality, but you can change to work in draft mode or just about anything else. As with all things, the best way to learn is to do it, to print simple things and move to complex things, here's a tube ring that is fully parameterised for mounting computers on telescopes. This version is approximately 200 versions along. Its taken 18 months to get to this. There's a lot of things in here to make it just right, Hope this helps as a primer to 3d printing. Rob
  14. Because it's actually quicker, cheaper and easier to print it. You have to get appropriate plastic sheet, cut it neatly, cut holes in that are in the exact place to the right diameter, taper them for a counter sunk screw and then make two of them. I designed all of that in F360 in 10 mins and it'll take 90 mins to print even at a high resolution. If @TheGreek wants another one or two, or three or 99, I just print them off. It's the future I can do a nice tapered finish so the inside of the ring is perhaps 2.2mm tapering down to 1.8mm at the outside. Thats another two mins of design. Rob
  15. If its what you put at the top, it's about 10 mins to design and an hour or so to print.
  16. what do you need printing. So long as it fits on the bed it should be easy enough.
  17. Love the build and if 1) you enjoy it and 2) you learn from it, thats worth it. I like it, it's classy, but the only person who needs to like it is yourself As I know little about this sort of stuff, why do you need someone to groove the nut please? Does this need to be very precise or it's an art rather than a science. Always happy to improve my ignorance (which is boundless) Best wishes Rob
  18. I use these batteries for astrophotography. They can put out a lot of current at one time to handle the slew of a telescope mount motor thats loaded with a couple of kg of kit. 9VAh is quite a lot. They don't have multiple outputs which could be very useful, but I normally put a USB hub on and draw power from that which is not what most pedals can do However I leave it here as a possible solution, they are chunky and seem to last forever for me even in the cold. Rob
  19. Oh my god. I think I’ve just had a very wet and possibly religious experience…
  20. Thanks, thats reassuring. I do have a far too complicated sound setup using sound control for different speakers and for different meeting systemsand for <ahem> Battlefield 4 </ahem>. Now I know it works, I'll make more of an effort. Rob
  21. It's not working for me either, Firefox/Chrome/Safari on Mac M1 Mini. Will look further, and might even power up a Windows laptop as a last resourt I am getting different errors and wonder if my firewall is getting in the way. I'll look over the day. Rob
  22. True. We’ll split the profits 50/50
  23. Saw that at BT Martlesham Heath in the 1980s', they took the C Pre-Processor and wrote a lot of macros so it resembled Basic but was really in C. Debugging that garbage was painful. In the end, I taught them how to use C to save my own sanity.
×
×
  • Create New...