That's a fair assessment. No question it evolved into a custom instrument.
It's still a great bass for the money, even if one only did the rudimentary things one does when acquiring a new instrument. In other words, adapt it to your tastes and needs. That may be as simple as changing the strings.
Most players probably wouldn't wish or need to pump high-end components into it as I did. And they'd still have a mighty fine bass for the money. Or a solid foundation for a totally pro instrument.
[quote name='Annoying Twit' timestamp='1402345165' post='2472524']
A nice looking bass. But, surely with the new pickups/electronics, the extra fretwork, the upgraded finish, a lot of this bass is now down to the work you've done, rather than the J&D original?
The Barts cost more than the whole J&D bass. [url="http://www.thomann.de/gb/bartolini_baj9j1_pickupset.htm"]http://www.thomann.d...1_pickupset.htm[/url] They have more character (to my ears) than the Wilko pickups on the HB1975 jazz. [url="http://www.thomann.de/gb/harley_benton_hbb1975_na.htm"]http://www.thomann.d..._hbb1975_na.htm[/url] Though, maybe that's an unfair comparison as they aren't in the same bass with the same EQ settings.
I think what you'e done sounds like it's great. But, is it more like a custom bass now?
[/quote]