Mattbass97

[quote name='Lozz196' timestamp='1332589516' post='1590350'] The Marshall will be louder. I used to have the 4210, and used it in a heavy rock band with 2 gtrs using Marshall half-stacks, and a very loud drummer. Admittedly, for gigs I took along the matching 115, but that was more for the look than the needing another cab, although it does beef up the sound a lot. Volume wise, combo on its own, it used to be on about 5/6, with plenty more available (7 was wayyyyy too much). I used a Fender Rumble 100 combo last week at a gig. Fantastic tone, but run flat out I couldn`t hear myself. 50 more watts I wouldn`t think would make that much more difference. [/quote] Thanks

[quote name='PaulWarning' timestamp='1332589844' post='1590359'] I've got a Marshall MB 4210 which I use with a 1 x 15 ext cab, it's LOUD, never got anywhere near full volume, [/quote] What about reliability? Could write me a mini review Please? Thanks

What would go for a fender rumble 150 head with fender rumble 410 cab or Marshall mb4210 combo? I play rock orientated stuff (foo fighters) as my main genre with my band but I play everything from blues to acid jazz to funk to rock! I've played through a fender rumble 150 into a Marshall 410 can before and it copes volume wise but I also have a Marshall mb30 and I want to know which one of the two options (mb4210 or rumble combo) will give me the most volume? I know more speakers is more air moved but I was wondering if the Marshall will be as loud or louder. I like the tone of both but prefer the Marshall just abit. Comments and answers please! Many thanks!