Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Godber

Member
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Godber

  1. [quote name='Adee' timestamp='1322875053' post='1457011']
    Yes I believe there is, why do you ask ?
    [/quote]

    I got hold of a '72 4001 recently which had some routing under the pickguard. It's pretty common when something like Precision pick-ups were added. Depending on how it was done it could weaken things and may have led to the electrics being changed.

    Nice to see period pick-ups in yours, they are expensive to replace.

  2. [quote name='Who's Who' timestamp='1319935403' post='1420393']

    The blue colour's name you mention was called exactly that, Blueburst.
    It was the Colour of the year for 2005, however Rickenbacker had previously done a couple of guitars for Mary Chapin Carpenter in that finish.

    When Rickenbacker do a 'Colour of the year', they only finish the orders taken that year, and then delete the Colour, so they do remain fairly rare. Rickenbacker have currently suspended 'Colour of the year' and are only concentrating on their four standard Colours to speed up production.

    In answer to the topic's question, I'd go Fireglo all day long. It's a truly gorgeous finish, plus you get to see the grain of the wood (stunning on Rickenbackers), as well as the Mahogany wings on the headstock. You miss both of these with the solid colours.

    I own a Blueburst 4003, and she's a real stunner. I do however still lust over a Fireglo model, and a while back I was thinking of selling her to buy a Fireglo model.

    Here's a link to some photo's of my Blueburst 4003 in case anyone's interested: [url="http://s850.photobucket.com/albums/ab65/Minty731/Rickenbacker%204003/?albumview=slideshow"]http://s850.photobuc...mview=slideshow[/url]
    [/quote]
    Nice bass, like your photos too. :)
    FG and JG are good for me.



  3. [quote name='Stacker' timestamp='1318592154' post='1404059']
    Well, at what I'm flogging it for you could get the re-fin and the re-fret done and still come in on a price on par with a '73. :)

    V63 FG maybe coming on, too.
    [/quote]
    What year is the V63?

  4. I think that it is very overpriced. Ask for close up photos of the back around the neck plate and look for stress cracks - there is very little wood there between the plate and the bolted neck joint and it is a vulnerable spot.

    It bears a remarkable resemblance to this one which sold very recently on eBay...

    [url="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/160632352359?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.co.uk%3A80%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dp5039.m570.l1313%26_nkw%3D160632352359%26_sacat%3DSee-All-Categories%26_fvi%3D1&_rdc=1#ht_500wt_1156"]http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/160632352359?ru=...1#ht_500wt_1156[/url]


    This is more like the price of a clean one...

    [url="http://www.ebay.de/itm/Rickenbacker-480-Vintage-1975-echt-rar-/320746019240?pt=Gitarren&hash=item4aadf3d9a8#ht_13772wt_1397"]http://www.ebay.de/itm/Rickenbacker-480-Vi...ht_13772wt_1397[/url]

    Good luck with the search, they aren't that common.

  5. [quote name='bumnote' post='1232470' date='May 15 2011, 09:33 PM']Thats gorgeous

    Whats the difference between a V63 and a V64?[/quote]

    The C64 is reputedly a more accurate reproduction of the Rose Morris 1999 import model than the V63. There are cosmetic differences with the pick guard shape etc., plus it has a long style sixties headstock which is reversed in reference to Macca's bass. They also had period correct pick-ups and electrics with the low end cap.

    C64

  6. [quote name='squire' post='1232450' date='May 15 2011, 09:05 PM']Yeah, really nice flamed.
    No, it's not very slim i'm afraid. (compared to my ric 4001 '78 and jazz bass). I could measure the neck width and contour if anyone is interested.[/quote]

    Thanks for the honest info. It's a beauty and it's a good price. My '78 4000 has a slim neck too, must have been a good year. :)

×
×
  • Create New...