-
Posts
385 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Posts posted by The Twickerman
-
-
In the end I was unable to get this to work.
Instead I use the guitar input for the bass, and the return for the guitar.
The problem was that the pan block is linked to the volume pedal, so if I use that, I will in effect lose the volume pedal.~~Not so elegant a solution - but perfectly ok!
-
So, this is the signal path
stereo return => pan block (to mute unused instrument) => mono/stereo effects* => output block (panned to mute collapsed stereo) => stereo outs for board & amp out for backline
*mono effects would collapse stereo effects into mono on both channels
I think this will work...
-
15 hours ago, BigRedX said:
Just remember that there can be a difference between "stereo" and two channel, and the latter is what you want.
Some stereo signal paths never truly isolate the left and right signals which means there is always the potential for bleed between the channels, especially when chaining multiple effects together.
Indeed, I plan to use the pan option in the Output settings to selectively mute the other channel. If I find that extraneous noises do bleed across I'll have to look at inserting a suitable block at the start of the chain to do the muting.
Coincidentally, one of the necks on one of the doublenecks is a bass VI. Fantastic instruments!
-
Thanks all.
Think I'm going to take a punt on the Pod GO.
I play a double-neck guitar/bass - which has a stereo out.
I can plug into the stereo return. Then the stereo out will offer separate bass and guitar line signals for the sound man. And I can use the mono amp output (with amp sims) to feed a full range cab on stage for both.
Seems the most elegant solution - and the cheapest!
Just hope it sounds good. -
FYI, my full shopping list of features is:-
Connectivity
2-inputs (if only one - can use a return instead)
2-outputs (or stereo)
MIDI out (not essential) with patch/channel control
Controls
4 dedicated well-spaced patch select footswitches (min)
Volume pedal
Models
Guitar amps (vintage clean)
Bass amps (vintage clean)
Effects
Marshall SupaFuzz (or similar)
Phaser (similar to Synthi HiFli)
Delay
-
On 04/06/2022 at 21:06, Skybone said:
Yes, everything depends on the available budget.
Although Helix is excellent, it isn't exactly cheap. If you can afford the LT or the full fat Helix, then go for it. If you can't quite stretch to those, then HX Stomp or HX Stomp XL would be a good choice. But, if the budget's a bit less, then the the POD Go is a fabulous wee thing, definitely a great choice.
The Stomp doesn't have enough patch buttons and the Stomp XL is sadly missing an expression pedal. Although cost doesn't preclude them, a fraction of the cost for the full Helix or even the LT, the Pod Go is a strong contender!
-
Hi all,
can anyone recommend mutli-effect pedal units which include guitar AND bass amp models?
Ta!
- Nick.
-
No other suggestions?
-
Thanks. I should add that usage is primarily for practice - guitar and bass, but also as a recording interface.
For practicing it needs built-in effects (reverb, fuzz, delay, phaser...) and programmable presets.The Positive Grid Spark looks good - but lack of a desktop PC app for programming is a severe issue.
A desktop unit is much preferred... like the THR-10 - but more reliable! -
The Yamaha THR-10 really does hit the spot: models, effects, usability and, most importantly, sounds!
However reliability appears to be an issue. My second has just died. Anyone else had issue with it?
Looking at the Positive Grid Spark now.
Comments>? -
Thanks again folks.
-
Thanks Tony. Please note that I am not waiting to replace the TE head though.
-
On 03/01/2019 at 10:36, tonyquipment said:
Slap some castors on the trace stack.
That or buy a sack truck 😎👌🏻
Except that it's size (not weight or portability) I am trying to reduce.
I have a very small house! -
Thanks anyway!
-
Are you interested in any trades?
Pedals, for example? -
I wasn't previously familiar with Barefaced. I think I need to find out more about them.
-
29 minutes ago, PaulWarning said:
this may be a stupid question but if you're using a full PA can't you just put more of your bass through the your monitor?
I still want to have backline - I just want a smaller cab!
-
Thanks folks,
some great suggestions there - thanks.
In answer to the questions - this is for medium-sized venues with PA for all backline and on-stage monitor mix. Funnily enough I've found that the bigger venues need less backline volume than pub gigs. Nevertheless I guess I need at least to match the volume levels delivered through the TA 1x15".
I'm after a punchier tone and had been considering swapping the TE 1x15" for a 2x10". But I'm also after a smaller size (moreso than lighter weight) - and wonder whether I might get an acceptable solution from a modern 2x8" or even 4x5".- Nick.
-
Hi folks,
I'm looking for some advice. I'm impressed by some of the modern compact class-D amp head and cabinet combinations now available (e.g from Mark Bass and Trace Elliott). If I were starting out now - that's definitely what I'd be checking out.
Instead I have a 30-year old Trace Elliott Twin Valve head coupled with a very heavy 1x15" cabinet. I love it.
But it is a hefty solution. My question is this: I think I am too wedded to the amp to change it - but am wondering if I could at least pick a smaller cabinet. Maybe something like the 4x5" (or 8x5") from PJB or any number of other compact units form Trace or Mark Bass or suchlike.
Has anyone tried this sort of thing?
Grateful for the benefit of people's experiences.
- Nick.
-
I've done some "at home" (low volume) testing (I shalln't be going into the rehearsal rooms until the new year).
I am happy to post my initial conclusion is that this thing is fantastic!
Great overdrives, distortions and fuzz (and a boost/cut) - and all programmable.
Best bit?
Loads of bass!!!!
I think this is everything I need in one (albeit big) box.
Highly recommended.
-
I guess I shall find out how it sounds shortly.
I will try to remember to report back!
-
Aha!
Thanks. I can see the value - our guitarist works like that too.
My setup - and my brain - work slightly differently. I have (currently) 8 different sounds from my board - which I select by name - not sequence. For each of those sounds, the ES-8 can specify any pedal patch (on the appropriate MIDI channel for that device) so it works well for me.
-
I actually don't know what that means! 🙄
I have other midi controllable pedals - each is on a separate channel. For each sound I need, I send the patch number from the ES-8 to the appropriate channel (as well as handling all the routing for the pedals, of course).
-
I was planning to do all the programming on the pedal - saving about 10 patches - then using the ES-8 to select them.
One rig for everything?
in Amps and Cabs
Posted
Planning on using an FRFR for our forthcoming gigs. I play basses and twelve string guitars. Using a Valeton GP-200 into the Headrush FR-112, I am hoping to simplify the on-stage clutter dramatically.