Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Commando Jack

Member
  • Posts

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Commando Jack

  1. I play them in using an electric kit. Currently its a Yamaha DTXpress IV which meant I had a little bit of setting up to do (press MIDI learn, hit pad, rinse repeat....). Before that I used a DD-55 which gave equally convincing results but wasn't as comfortable to play.

    With those setups I've had at least two producers ask how I recorded the drums and be surprised that they're programmed. By playing them in (keyboards is another option) you get all the human timing and dynamics of a real drummer and can clean it up if necessary with the piano roll editor.

  2. [quote name='bremen' timestamp='1339153818' post='1684420']
    You guys have had very sheltered lives if you haven't heard much worse than that!
    [/quote]

    I agree BUT that was because I didn't know the song (so shoot me). So I AB'd a couple of times and the general consensus is absolutely correct: a generously proportioned homicide has taken place.

    It's certainly not just the bass player's fault though - the bassline seems to be completely arranged around the fact that it's a good deal faster that the original. A w**kfest from all parties who probably thought "let's ROCK IT UP!!" A phrase which I am beginning to really detest...

  3. Everyone's covered the basics for changing the drummer's sound and technique etc. Another solution I've seen that can work for some venues (usually churches) is perspex screens like [url="http://www.drumscreens.co.uk/tech%20specs.html"]these[/url]. The drummer plays at his normal volume, so you get the sound you admire, but the front of house volume is reduced and balanced through the PA. The drummer would probably need in-ear monitoring though, because the kit is really bloody loud behind the perspex. It would work for your typical wedding venues that are a stage at the end of a large rectangular room, but not for Bilbo's restaurant example obviously!

  4. [quote name='silddx' timestamp='1338367338' post='1673223']
    have a full and frank with the guitarist and see what he thinks.
    [/quote]

    This would be what I think - Have a think about what you want, and when you know what you want have a chat with the guy to see what he actually wants. If it's something that can work, then go from there. Also, this is probably still pretty raw seeing as he only got back to you last night, so a bit of time spent fully processing what happened might be worth it. Don't act out of anger or resentment, whatever you do.

  5. Thought it would be another Deep Sunshine post, glad it's not but Holy...

    Sometimes, as above, I think these people are just starting out and are unfortunate to end up on Youtube. Other times I have to chalk it up to the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect"]Dunning-Kruger Effect[/url].

  6. Just got a Proteus 2000 from Rabs - a pleasure to deal with throughout. Good communication and the unit arrived very well packaged.

  7. [quote name='janmaat' post='1356584' date='Aug 30 2011, 05:40 PM']I quite like this

    [url="http://www.thomann.de/de/alesis_multimix_4usb.htm"]http://www.thomann.de/de/alesis_multimix_4usb.htm[/url]

    Looks like it would be an easy way to make demo tracks on the fly

    any opinions?[/quote]

    I'm not sure what you mean by "demo tracks on the fly", but I believe this unit will only record 2 tracks at once. That would mean that if you had all 4 inputs plugged in to instruments/mics you would be recording a stereo mixdown of those tracks and you wouldn't be able to change it after. You get more flexibility from recording one instrument/vocal at a time.

    For £80, your best bet might be M-Audio's Fast Track. This is a 2 input, 2 output USB interface that has a direct monitoring function (helpful if you have problems with latency) and 24bit/48kHz recording. The "24 bit" is far more desirable than 16 bit because it gives more headroom and makes it more convenient to record. It also comes with Pro-Tools M-powered Essential, but you don't have to use this, as it's compatible with other programs. Simply using Audacity (an open source audio editor) might be more useful for you if you're recording single tracks.

  8. [quote name='WILD FROG SHOT' post='1358482' date='Sep 1 2011, 09:49 AM']Thank you! That does make sense. It's a right PITA trying to play along to it though; at one point I was considering trying to tune down a quarter tone, but that's just getting ridiculous.[/quote]

    I have the same problem the odd time, but if you've got an mp3 of the song you can use [url="http://download.cnet.com/BestPractice/3000-2133_4-10794555.html"]Best Practice[/url], which is a freeware practise utility that lets you change keys and microtune. You should be able to get the track close enough to standard tuning to make it bearable. It's also great when you want to change the key of the song completely, even if it does sound a bit artificial.

  9. [quote name='WILD FROG SHOT' post='1357374' date='Aug 31 2011, 12:06 PM']EDIT: On a separate note, does anyone know what is going on with the original version of 'Three little birds'; it sounds like it's between keys :)[/quote]

    When everything was done on tape, it was common for producers to speed up or slow down the mixed track to aquire the right feel. A small change in bpm would make the song sharp when speeded up or flat when slowed, though not enough to completely change key. Or it could have been microtuning to be in key with an ethnic instrument not tuned to 440 Hz.

  10. I have a Boss DD-7, which I have found does what I need. Has a tap tempo mode with several different repeat settings (i.e 1/4. 1/8/ 3/16 etc), and you have the option of having a footswitch (although this is not required). The digitech hardwire DL-8 is also worth a look apparently, although I never got my hands on one to try.

  11. [quote name='Dave Vader' post='1350438' date='Aug 24 2011, 04:42 PM']Which is why my guitar rig is an old 15w Vox V15 which I can drive the bejesus out of without deafening people, and stick a mike in front of it at big venues.

    As opposed to the guitarist in my 80s tribute band, who runs a 100w Diesel into a Marshall 4 x 12. He doesn't like it when I make him turn it down, but he wants to be in the PA, so he has to ****ing turn that amp down and stop deafening us, or listen to my suggestion of smaller backline in smaller venues (which is right for guitars that need driving, and not for clean bassy noises).[/quote]

    Agreed, tube guitar amps are a whole different kettle of fish. Cranked amps start to push the output valves and transformer to give very fat sounding harmonic distortion that (IME) can't be replicated by just overdriving the preamp valves. There are a raft of 1 -15W guitar amps on the market aimed at the studio market - i.e. amps where you can hit the sweet spot without deafening anyone. Why anyone carries a 100W rig anywhere but a stadium is beyond me.

×
×
  • Create New...