Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

bornleft

Member
  • Posts

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bornleft

  1. Congratulation!

    Per David Byrne: Patience is a virtue, but I don't have much time...

    The transparency of the finish is what makes it pop!

     

    Please explain why it is easier to play than the Wal?  Also, it seems to me, if I was a betting man,

    that the reverse engineered pre-amp will not get installed for an A/B test....

    • Like 1
  2. When Funkle finishes his experiment, I want to take a recording of his Wal, his Wal-ish bass and the Octave bass and do a blind test....

     

    Yes, Octave man should be getting a knock on his door shortly....  but as you know Wal has no time to even take a fosters, let alone 

    hire US attorneys....

  3. Also, when I go back and listen the u-tube video of the Turner+Lusithand installed in the Jazzus bod:y https://youtu.be/p7g1cpHSyQk the output is a

    long way from the Octave bass recording:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mCuSYD9Drs

     

    Is it not true that the Octave guy is using the Lusithand amp?  If so, then the Turner pickups must be the predominant issue...  

     

    Would you not agree that the Octave guy has solved this problem???????

     

     

  4. Well I believe, please correct me if I am in error, that you are done w/ p/up changes and probably pre-amp changes-

    More than likely, you would have not commissioned the body otherwise....

    That being the case I am not sure what is left for you to alter... and thus

    how much closer you can get...

     

    I guess no one stepped up to reverse engineer the pre-amp?

  5. Is it correct to say that the completed project will use the same p/ups and pre-amp as used in your third sample?

    If so, is it fair to say that very minimal if any, changes to the tonality of the final instrument are expected?

    Body shape will produce no changes but "perhaps" the mahogany core will do "something"....

×
×
  • Create New...