Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Large Bass Cabs


Guest BassAdder27

Recommended Posts

With the trend to go smaller or certainly lighter are we seeing cabs that are lacking in low end depth as a sacrifice to weight ?

 

Not referring to the high end stuff but the everyday offerings from manufacturers 

 

Point in case is the cab up for sale on here large heavy 212 600w 4ohm cab 

which I would imagine would be a lot fuller than my two small Neo Ashdown cabs ?

 

Thoughts ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes an interesting read Bill … so perhaps smaller box with more efficient higher powered cones can produce more bass. 
 

Would there be any benefit of say upgrading the small Ashdown 210 Neo cabs ( Sica speakers ) with higher powered 10” speakers ?

They are rated total 300W and I believe even Ashdown have uprated  cabs to 500W 

Interested if my limit is the compact sealed cab or a combination of cab volume and speaker or speaker itself ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got one of the Ashdown 210 sealed cabs too (300w non-neo version). The cone excursion when driven hard on low notes is visibly pretty large. For that small cabinet size there is going to be a complex trade-off between max cone excursion, thermal power handling and driver sensitivity.

 

It could turn out that a higher power driver with greater Xmax could have less sensitivity and will not actually be louder or offer any practical advantage. Be interesting to see what Bill says.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BassAdder27 said:

It makes an interesting read Bill … so perhaps smaller box with more efficient higher powered cones can produce more bass. 
 

Would there be any benefit of say upgrading the small Ashdown 210 Neo cabs ( Sica speakers ) with higher powered 10” speakers ?

They are rated total 300W and I believe even Ashdown have uprated  cabs to 500W 

Interested if my limit is the compact sealed cab or a combination of cab volume and speaker or speaker itself ? 

Power rating has nothing to do with LF output capability. Or very little at best. There’s a lot more to a driver than it’s thermal power handling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nilebodgers said:

I've got one of the Ashdown 210 sealed cabs too (300w non-neo version). The cone excursion when driven hard on low notes is visibly pretty large. For that small cabinet size there is going to be a complex trade-off between max cone excursion, thermal power handling and driver sensitivity.

 

It could turn out that a higher power driver with greater Xmax could have less sensitivity and will not actually be louder or offer any practical advantage. Be interesting to see what Bill says.

If you're seeing large excursion you need a highpass filter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BassAdder27 said:

It makes an interesting read Bill … so perhaps smaller box with more efficient higher powered cones can produce more bass.

There's very little difference in the sensitivity of different bass drivers, so that's not going to work. Higher power handling to get more bass out of a smaller cabinet is a requisite, but the thermal ratings aren't what matter, mechanical ratings are. You can't get those unless you have the driver data sheets.

 

If you really don't want to get high output in the lows use a sealed cab. Even when the same size as a ported cab they give up almost an octave of low frequency extension.

 

Look at it this way. Violins don't go as loud as violas, which don't go as low as cellos, which don't go as low as double basses. Size is the reason why. The same physics apply to speaker cabinets.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BassAdder27 said:

With the trend to go smaller or certainly lighter are we seeing cabs that are lacking in low end depth as a sacrifice to weight ?

 

If the cabs you're listening to don't do enough low end, you've got to start listening to the cabs that do. They are out there and there is a great selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s strange but I’ve recently realised that I’m not keen on cabs that go too low in frequency as they seem to separate the bass from the rest of the instruments rather than placing it with them. 
 

Re the larger cabs, one of the best cabs I ever had was a Marshall VBC412, obviously big, 100lbs+ but oh, the sound, didn’t need to add much in the way of low end on the amp, it was just solid and beefy. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, chris_b said:

Low mids is where the good bass lines live.

Very true Chris, last night at band practice I cut at 40Hz and the result was my Precision supported nicely with a good strong presence but no low-end boom/sludge. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, chris_b said:

Low mids is where the good bass lines live.

Yep. I was going to ask why the OP needs a lot of real-world lf extension? Gigging without PA support? 

 

Am I right in thinking that Hoffman's Iron law relates to the parameters of compactness, bass extension and sensitivity; you can only have any two, but at the expense of the third. For example: you can have oodles of bass and good sensitivity,  but not in a small box. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For my uses most amps seem to have the bass just a bit too low, but then I suppose manufacturers have to take into account those that detune, and 5-string basses. When I listen to the bass sounds of the songs that I grew up with in the 70s & 80s they’re not deep low down bass at all, though at they time they seemed so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lozz196 said:

For my uses most amps seem to have the bass just a bit too low, but then I suppose manufacturers have to take into account those that detune, and 5-string basses. When I listen to the bass sounds of the songs that I grew up with in the 70s & 80s they’re not deep low down bass at all, though at they time they seemed so.

A HPF (high pass fiter ) can make the bass control very much more useful.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lozz196 said:

When I listen to the bass sounds of the songs that I grew up with in the 70s & 80s they’re not deep low down bass at all, though at they time they seemed so.

That's because the speakers of that era, both the ones we played through and the ones the recordings were listened to on, weren't capable of going low. Don't forget that the #1 playback system in those days was a car radio/CD player, and cars didn't have subs as standard equipment then. Even studios didn't have great sound. The Yamaha NS-10 and LS3/5A weren't exactly bass monsters, and while Altec A7s were big and loud they didn't really go all that low. Give a listen to anything from the 50s to the early 80s and there one thing you'll almost never hear: a low E. The inability of vintage speakers to play a clean low E above bedroom levels is what started me building my own.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Lozz196 said:

Yeah I’ve got a Tech21 Q-strip on way which has an HPF on it, think removing all that excess is the way to go.

I loved my Q/Strip. In fact i brought it back after selling it. Its now gone permanently, but i wouldn’t hesitate to get another (used though).

The HPF is nice to have but its not adjustable and set quite tame for bass. Nice to have that extra protection though, but might not make a huge difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Lozz196 said:

That’s good to hear Dave, I don’t want too much of a difference, just enough to reduce the boom and the effort on the cones a bit.

The Q/strip is pretty wonderful for EQ, but amazing for proper tone shaping. The issue i had with it was too many great tones in it, i needed a programable version. This made it hard to settle on any one tone, and as i had my BDDI as well life was complicated, so to make life easier i stopped using it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...