Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Warwick Gnome Arrived Today


Obrienp

Recommended Posts

Does the Warwick Gnome have a MOSfet preamp just like the TC BAM 200?

As the amps appear to be sourced from the same OEM/ODM surpplier I'm struggling to understand why there is a price difference.  Gnome £109 BAM 200 £118

Edited by JohnDaBass
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The input impedance is 10Mohm so, yes it's MOSFET but that isn't really a special feature nowadays. Also not in the advertising is that there is apparently some compression built into the input stage. It's mentioned briefly in the manual that came with it and there is a bit of crunch that comes in when the signal lamp starts flashing, 

 

I've no idea how Music Tribe (Behringer/TC) work but I doubt they share components with Warwick. More likely they share the same chip set produced by a third party. The big chip manufacturers release all sorts of application notes with circuits in, including board layouts and development packs. Certainly for the power amps manufacturers use mostly what they are given. The pre amps may vary but if you squeeze gain,bass,middle, treble and master controls into the smallest possible space you are going to end up with things that look very similar even if slightly different frequencies are used in thee controls. Behringer have also been known to um... make 'tribute' amps. If I open mine up I'll take some photos if someone wants to take a BAM apart. I doubt they will sound much different as they are pretty much flat response amps.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Phil Starr said:

The input impedance is 10Mohm so, yes it's MOSFET but that isn't really a special feature nowadays. Also not in the advertising is that there is apparently some compression built into the input stage. It's mentioned briefly in the manual that came with it and there is a bit of crunch that comes in when the signal lamp starts flashing, 

 

I've no idea how Music Tribe (Behringer/TC) work but I doubt they share components with Warwick. More likely they share the same chip set produced by a third party. The big chip manufacturers release all sorts of application notes with circuits in, including board layouts and development packs. Certainly for the power amps manufacturers use mostly what they are given. The pre amps may vary but if you squeeze gain,bass,middle, treble and master controls into the smallest possible space you are going to end up with things that look very similar even if slightly different frequencies are used in thee controls. Behringer have also been known to um... make 'tribute' amps. If I open mine up I'll take some photos if someone wants to take a BAM apart. I doubt they will sound much different as they are pretty much flat response amps.

 

There's photos of the BAM200 guts elsewhere on here:

 

BAM.jpg

 

 

Would be interesting to see how similar the Gnome is, the control layout is identical although the LEDs are positioned differently.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there's the sort of generic resemblance you'd expect. The switch mode power supply at the bottom looks very similar indeed apart from the heat sink. I quite like the toroidal transformer in the BAM but the component layout looks just about identical. The power amp is very similar too, lots of detailed differences but the same architecture but that's as you'd expect. You can clearly see the two amplifier chips bolted to the finned heatsink in the Gnome and sure enough there they are again in the Bam bolted to the big bent heatsink there. They may indeed be using the same chip, I'm not so keen on that inductor on the BAM which is there for rf suppression on the output (the untidy copper winding about one third down just right of centre) it's much tidier and more substantial in the Gnome. 

 

I wouldn't say they were built in the same place though, just the same chips in very similar configurations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Well from a manufacturing point of view I would prefer to build the single board implementation of the common chipset architecture. The BAM single pcb appears to have a lower labour content. If there is a common chipset  hardware architecture then the material cost is going to be close, the labour content is going to be the product cost differentiater. The Gnome has several sub assembly pcbs connected to the main pcb with ribbon cables and cable looms. The preamp is a separate sub assembly and even the input jack and headphone jack are on separate pcb boards. Generally speaking reliability can be vulnerable when multiple pcbs as plugged or soldered together.  A single pcb solution offers a more robust level of reliability. A single pcb solution contributes to lower manufacturing cost as the whole of the hardware can be tested on single in circuit test rigs providing much faster feedback for the validation of the manufacturing process. 

Having said all that the BAM should be cheaper to produce so why are they £9  more expensive than the Gnome. ???????

Edited by JohnDaBass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For further comparison, this site has internal pictures of the Trace Elliott ELF (I remember seeing pictures on here at one point but can't find them now - maybe from TheGreek?).

 

Given that there's only centimetres of separation between mains inlet pins and pins on the front panel jacks on all three of these, I think I like the look of the TC design with the least internal wiring to flap around the best! I'm amazed the Trace one meets safety standards.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Phil Starr said:

So there's the sort of generic resemblance you'd expect. The switch mode power supply at the bottom looks very similar indeed apart from the heat sink. I quite like the toroidal transformer in the BAM but the component layout looks just about identical. The power amp is very similar too, lots of detailed differences but the same architecture but that's as you'd expect. You can clearly see the two amplifier chips bolted to the finned heatsink in the Gnome and sure enough there they are again in the Bam bolted to the big bent heatsink there. They may indeed be using the same chip, I'm not so keen on that inductor on the BAM which is there for rf suppression on the output (the untidy copper winding about one third down just right of centre) it's much tidier and more substantial in the Gnome. 

 

I wouldn't say they were built in the same place though, just the same chips in very similar configurations.

 

Would you say there's room to replace the jack output with a speakon?

Edited by lemmywinks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, lemmywinks said:

 

This is the thing that niggles me on all these nano heads, turned down an Elf locally for a bargain price because of it. They could easily put a Speakon combi socket in there.

A combi socket would be nice. I grew up on jacks and really don't mind using them on something that is relatively low powered, You can also buy jack to Speakon adaptors and I have one in the gig bag I my Gnome is in so I can use a jack/jack lead and still connect to a more conventional cab. I don't find it a problem. I've screwed my amp back together so can't help you with advice but most sockets are wired to the boards directly making a socket swap problematic. Is this an aesthetic thing for you or a worry about current handling?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Phil Starr said:

A combi socket would be nice. I grew up on jacks and really don't mind using them on something that is relatively low powered, You can also buy jack to Speakon adaptors and I have one in the gig bag I my Gnome is in so I can use a jack/jack lead and still connect to a more conventional cab. I don't find it a problem. I've screwed my amp back together so can't help you with advice but most sockets are wired to the boards directly making a socket swap problematic. Is this an aesthetic thing for you or a worry about current handling?

 

It's more just a "why do bass amps still have just 1/4" jacks in 2021" thing tbh, especially as it does lok like there's room for a Speakon in both of those. Maybe it's not just the cost saving of the 1/4" jack itself but also cheaper for it as much to be surface mount as possible. I can imagine if margins are tight then it might not be viable for a daughter board or soldering wires. I'd happily pay £10 more for that capability though.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, lemmywinks said:

 

It's more just a "why do bass amps still have just 1/4" jacks in 2021" thing tbh, especially as it does lok like there's room for a Speakon in both of those. Maybe it's not just the cost saving of the 1/4" jack itself but also cheaper for it as much to be surface mount as possible. I can imagine if margins are tight then it might not be viable for a daughter board or soldering wires. I'd happily pay £10 more for that capability though.

The marginal cost of a combi that would keep us all happy isn't that great but Neutrik would want their cut I guess and £10 on a £120 amp is significant. You'd think that Trace would want to distance themselves from their much cheaper competitors though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lemmywinks said:

 

It's more just a "why do bass amps still have just 1/4" jacks in 2021" thing tbh, especially as it does lok like there's room for a Speakon in both of those. Maybe it's not just the cost saving of the 1/4" jack itself but also cheaper for it as much to be surface mount as possible. I can imagine if margins are tight then it might not be viable for a daughter board or soldering wires. I'd happily pay £10 more for that capability though.

I agree with the sentiment, plus my Gnome is my backup amp. My main amp for gigs is an Orange Terror 500 that has 2 x Speakon sockets, which I use to connect two cabs. In order to have my Gnome as standby, I need to remember to pack a jack to speakon cable in addition to the two speakon to speakon cables. If I ever have to do a hot swap during a gig, I will need to unplug one cable, plug in the jack to speakon and reconfigure the cabinet cables so that they are daisy chained rather than coming straight out of the back of the amp. That’s a lot of faffing about under time pressure, possibly in poor lighting and often cramped conditions. Admittedly I could configure the cabinets to be daisy chained out of the Terror but given it has 2 speaker outlets, I am inclined to think there must be a reason for that, so I use them both. It would be great if the Gnome had speakon out (even a combi). That way the hot swap would just involve kettle lead and one speakon lead out of the Terror.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Obrienp said:

I agree with the sentiment, plus my Gnome is my backup amp. My main amp for gigs is an Orange Terror 500 that has 2 x Speakon sockets, which I use to connect two cabs. In order to have my Gnome as standby, I need to remember to pack a jack to speakon cable in addition to the two speakon to speakon cables. If I ever have to do a hot swap during a gig, I will need to unplug one cable, plug in the jack to speakon and reconfigure the cabinet cables so that they are daisy chained rather than coming straight out of the back of the amp. That’s a lot of faffing about under time pressure, possibly in poor lighting and often cramped conditions. Admittedly I could configure the cabinets to be daisy chained out of the Terror but given it has 2 speaker outlets, I am inclined to think there must be a reason for that, so I use them both. It would be great if the Gnome had speakon out (even a combi). That way the hot swap would just involve kettle lead and one speakon lead out of the Terror.

 

Yeah this is pretty much it really, I use in ears live but I still take my micro head to rehearsals for convenience along with a Speakon to jack cable so I can plug into anything with just that one cable. I had to replace the speakon in the amp with a combi socket but it was worth it as I have everything I need in a single box. Besides, look what the bloody Gnome cabs have, Bax are even doing a package deal with the Gnome head and a Speakon cable, somebody is going to be disappointed on Christmas day!
W_A_GNOME_CAB_10-8_06imyslttlGdSj1.jpg

 

Might just be getting stubborn and lazy in my old age but I don't really want to faff about with extra cables or adapters, besides the accessory pockets in my gigbags are already full of stuff anyway!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/10/2021 at 15:30, lemmywinks said:

 

It's more just a "why do bass amps still have just 1/4" jacks in 2021" thing tbh, especially as it does lok like there's room for a Speakon in both of those. Maybe it's not just the cost saving of the 1/4" jack itself but also cheaper for it as much to be surface mount as possible. I can imagine if margins are tight then it might not be viable for a daughter board or soldering wires. I'd happily pay £10 more for that capability though.

Here is another 200w offering with speakon output. 

 

https://www.pjbworld.com/cms/index.php/bp-200/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
1 hour ago, Rothko said:

While sorting out the 4-year warranty extension from warwick.de on my new-today Gnome i Pro, I saw in the drop down produect option menu a 'v2 300w Gnome Pro' and a '600w Gnome Pro'. Coming next year?

Picture1.png

Oooh good spot sir, a 600W Gnome will be very interesting. I love my 300 i Pro so very interested in a 600W model to perhaps become my main head. Will be interesting to see if it has any additional features or changes. Would be nice if they made it in the original black colour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...