Jump to content
TJ1

What, in your opinion, is the minimum 'gold standard' BPM a bassist needs to sustain in order to be acceptable/respectable?

Recommended Posts

The OP is clearly JTUK, back, complete with gigging strides.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Maude said:

Could it not be said that the bassist is still playing at 120bpm throughout the verse, but just playing no notes?

But is he (not) playing them in the right order? 🙂

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, TJ1 said:

I've got my own ideas on this but it would be interesting to see other people's opinions on this momentous,foundation subject.

That is the minimum finger/plectrum string strikes per minute across all/any notes on the fretboard.

This is a wind up surely??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TJ1 said:

 

Genuine and I think important question, particularly for those at beginner level,

 

yvlnHdB.jpg

 

I think worrying about how fast you can play is a good sign of a beginner.

There is a correct answer though - fast enough to play in time and tune to the fastest song you want to play.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Acceptable / respectable" musicians? No, it'll never catch on.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TJ1 said:

 

Genuine and I think important question, particularly for those at beginner level, I could have worded it less obnoxiously though.

I'll get my my coat.

 

No need to get your coat. Stick around and you'll find most folks are OK (not that @Teebs fella, but he can't help it 😉). I think a lot of folks are getting a bit short tempered with lockdowns and no gigging, I know I am. 

If you are a beginner then that's great and welcome to the world of bass. 

Maybe you could've asked, 'Is it important to be able to play fast?' Or something along those lines, rather than, 'How fast do you need to be able to play to be respected?' A similar question but worded differently comes across better. 

It takes time to find your feet in some places, that's all.

🙂👍

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bass_dinger said:

Agreed.  I have taught a teenager how to play the four root notes for a I IV V VIm progression in weeks 1 and 2, and watched her play it in week 3.  One note per beat, and she was very pleased to be playing it.  It was acceptable - not least because the church audience set the bar of attainment very low!

The original question was a good one - it made me think about what "good" looks like to others.  I have learnt a lot (and already knew that I not a fast player!).   

 

 

The original question is not a good one, in my humble opinion.

It is asking for a quantitative answer on a qualitative subject. A pointless exercise.

You might be capable of playing 500BPM but if you try it whilst performing "How long" by ace... you will ruin the song completely.

 It's a ridiculous criteria to judge a bass player by, hence my earlier thought as to whether the OP is a troll.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Maude said:

Could it not be said that the bassist is still playing at 120bpm throughout the verse, but just playing no notes? The song is still being played at 120bpm while the bassist waits to play some notes in the chorus. Even though the bassist isn't playing the song is never 0 bpm. 

A good point! 


And of course, even I can play rests at 120 bpm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I think a lot of people are being pretty unfair to the OP here.  The title might have been badly worded, but it's a legit question.

How many times do you see posts talking about drummers who keep dragging? If they drag, it's because they can't play the part and keep up with the tempo, and it's the same with bass players. What's going to happen if you're faced with a semiquaver pattern at 120 bpm or a fast walking line at 300 bpm and you can't keep up? You can play a nice semibreve, but it's not going to cut it and there's a chance that you probably won't get called again.  

Unlike what's been suggested earlier, no half decent player is going to play blazing fast lines over a mid tempo tune. Just because someone can play fast doesn't mean that they will do it all the time.

I agree with everyone that says a good player isn't measured by what bpm they can play at, but there are times when it is still important.

Edited by Doddy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Doddy said:

I think a lot of people are being pretty unfair to the OP here.  The title might have been badly worded, but it's a legit question.

How many times do you see posts talking about drummers who keep dragging? If they drag, it's because they can't play the part and keep up with the tempo, and it's the same with bass players. What's going to happen if you're faced with a semiquaver pattern at 120 bpm or a fast walking line at 300 bpm and you can't keep up? You can play a nice semibreve, but it's not going to cut it and there's a chance that you probably won't get called again.  

Unlike what's been suggested earlier, no half decent player is going to play blazing fast lines over a mid tempo tune. Just because someone can play fast doesn't mean that they will do it all the time.

I agree with everyone that says a good player isn't measured by what bpm they can play at, but there are times when it is still important.

I kind of agree. I can also imagine that in certain genres (speed metal if that is still a thing) it's the kind of question you may be asked if auditioning for a band. Also, I remember reading an interview with Mike Pope when he was subbing for Patitucci on the Chick Corea Elektric band. They opened the set with 'Got a match', which is 16th notes moving at 150 BPM with a fairly complex fingering pattern, doubling the keyboard melody . I'm guessing that if he couldn't have done that, Mike Pope wouldn't have got the gig. I suppose that's a kind of extreme example though as it's pretty much the outer limit of what is possible to play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Doddy said:

I think a lot of people are being pretty unfair to the OP here.  The title might have been badly worded, but it's a legit question...

I'd advance that it's equally important, and maybe even more difficult, to play evenly and musically to very slow tempi. It's certainly true in drumming, and often neglected as a quality. Not just slow movements, but also holding off during long rests, only to come back in at the appropriate place. Not everything is metronomic, either, so accelerating the rhythm, or slowing it down, when the piece calls for it, are equally precious skills. Having decently-experienced colleagues helps, if all are to 'ritardando' in sync. If fast playing is needed, one may 'fudge' it with a half-tempo version. If slow is called for, it cannot be replaced by doubling up. The ability to play slowly is a great asset for any musician. Just sayin'. B|

Edited by Dad3353

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Dad3353 said:

I'd advance that it's equally important, and maybe even more difficult, to play evenly and musically to very slow tempi. It's certainly true in drumming, and often neglected as a quality. Not just slow movements, but also holding off during long rests, only to come back in at the appropriate place. Not everything is metronomic, either, so accelerating the rhythm, or slowing it down, when the piece calls for it, are equally precious skills. Having decently-experienced colleagues helps, if all are to 'ritardando' in sync. If fast playing is needed, one may 'fudge' it with a half-tempo version. If slow is called for, it cannot be replaced by doubling up. The ability to play slowly is a great asset for any musician. Just sayin'. B|

No argument there. Of course it's important to be able to play consistently slow too.

Not everything is metronomic but there are a lot of situations where you're playing to a click, and in those cases it is. Sure you can fudge your way through if you're struggling, but wouldn't you rather be (or hire) the guy that can play it right rather than half arsed?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same song played at eg 70 bpm will likely require a different bass line to the same song played at eg 140bpm.

Playing for the song and arrangement is what matters.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Doddy said:

...Not everything is metronomic but there are a lot of situations where you're playing to a click, and in those cases it is. Sure you can fudge your way through if you're struggling, but wouldn't you rather be (or hire) the guy that can play it right rather than half arsed?

Again, I'm a drummer, so I maybe react differently. If something's too fast for me, click or no click, I'll play what I can, either dropping 'hits' or half-timing it. I'm now old, and my hi-hat has less stamina than in the past, so I'll do this more and more often. I may well start the song off correctly, but discreetly give my wrists a rest when I can, if it's not going to train-wreck the song. The important thing, for me, is to keep things flowing musically (on drums, but on bass or guitar, too...), and not sweat it if I'm no longer 'up to scratch'. The years spent practising and playing help with this, of course, but I'd say that anyone striving to attain any technical 'gold standard' should be aware that it is an ephemeral achievement at best, even when it's obtainable, so be prepared mentally for the deception when the feat is no longer possible. Play to one's own strengths, and leave the arms race to others, I say. B|

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 08/03/2021 at 08:47, TJ1 said:

That is the minimum finger/plectrum string strikes per minute across all/any notes on the fretboard.

It would have been a good one to ask Lemmy, but he'd have just replied with his death stare.

Easy to rack up BPM if you're one of those grunge kids that hammers the E string and keep the other three* for spares.

* other basses with more than four strings are available.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if the Tesco's on Green Street is doing a special offer on their own-brand pale ale right now?

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Big_Stu said:

* other basses with more than four strings are available.

Why?

:D

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Fishman said:

Does anyone know if the Tesco's on Green Street is doing a special offer on their own-brand pale ale right now?

I’m in green street tomorrow, I’ll have a look for you 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Reggaebass said:

I’m in green street tomorrow, I’ll have a look for you 

Thanks man – if they've got those Lady Gaga Oreo's can you grab a couple – they were deffo on special offer the other week

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, thodrik said:

Gold by Spandau Ballet has a BPM of 143, so this the correct answer in terms of finding the 'Gold' standard.

https://getsongbpm.com/song/gold/mwMVME

New Romantic!

What if a person is into Disco?

The 'gold medal' disco tune is Dancing Queen. Which was influenced by Jive Talkin'.

So you're looking at 100-104 BPM. :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Fishman said:

Thanks man – if they've got those Lady Gaga Oreo's can you grab a couple – they were deffo on special offer the other week

No problem, I might eat them on the way back though 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Maude said:

No need to get your coat. Stick around and you'll find most folks are OK (not that @Teebs fella, but  he can't help it 😉)🙂👍

Twerp!

>:(

:)

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If there was a gold standard for thread length word salad titles then this would be it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...