Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Gibson Thunderbird 2021


NancyJohnson

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Tee said:

Is the Gibson 2021 NR Thunderbird ever going to see the light of day, do you think? It's been a while since they were announced.

https://bassmagazine.com/gear/gibson-releases-new-non-reverse-thunderbird-basses

It's Gibson, who knows when they'll appear?  Who knows if they'll appear.  I note the chrome pickup covers though - looks identical to the Epiphone ones, even down to the chrome ring on the bridge pickup.  If they're the same pickups then what's the appeal of this NR?  If you want something with these pickups and a better bridge but not a reverse Thunderbird shape then just get an Epiphone Embassy?  Unless you simply must have an NR Thunderbird shaped bass I guess.  I had one of the NRs from last time around (circa 2014) and I remember it being a big bass, but with the usual TB+ pickups it wasn't exciting enough for me to keep it.  It wasn't a bad bass, it just felt a bit too ordinary considering the price tag.

moorings2014.jpg.9e05fb617cf69b573cfb93eeeb9121a6.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tee said:

Is the Gibson 2021 NR Thunderbird ever going to see the light of day, do you think? It's been a while since they were announced.

https://bassmagazine.com/gear/gibson-releases-new-non-reverse-thunderbird-basses

Gibson site shows pages of Les Pauls, SGs, 335s and pointy 'designer' stuff, but basses are limited to the SG Bass and Thunderbird in two colours each.

If they don't make these you'd just have a handful of disgruntled bass players going 'hurrumph!' and the whole launch would just quietly go away.  That said, expect to see the handful they have made in their Reverb Demo Shop.

Gibson just seem to be so out of touch with their (potential) customers; perhaps yes, thousands of people do actually want more Les Pauls and SGs, but there was also massive interest (still is) for a faithful reissues of the Junior double cut, Firebird FB1, Thunderbird II basses.EB2s etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

To be fair most basses/guitars were cheaper back then. The AM Pro II P bass is more than double what i paid for mine (equivalent, US Standard) back then.

Shame they don't do the single pickup version.

Edited by Tee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tee said:

To be fair most basses/guitars were cheaper back then. The AM Pro II P bass is more than double what i paid for mine (equivalent, US Standard) back then.

Shame they don't do the single pickup version.

What, and Gibson make people happy?  Are you new? ;) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Tee said:

To be fair most basses/guitars were cheaper back then. The AM Pro II P bass is more than double what i paid for mine (equivalent, US Standard) back then.

Shame they don't do the single pickup version.

Back then?  We're not talking the 1940s.  The t-shirt I'm currently wearing pre-dates my NR purchase!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NancyJohnson said:

Back then?  We're not talking the 1940s.  The t-shirt I'm currently wearing pre-dates my NR purchase!

Sure:

10 years - back then.

20 years - back when.

30 years - way back when.

40 years - when all this was just fields.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

On the Gibson Mod-Shop they had a pelham blue NR Thunderbird up for $1.6K last week. 

 

Interestingly, this lacks the scratchplate and the chromed hardware/pickup covers of the current reissues and, to be honest, this looks a whole lot better for it. 

 

The only things I could add to improve things?  Put the Gibson logo back on the truss-rod cover, give it a two part bridge, and cosmetically, line the pots up in a straight line and move the output jack to the lower bout.  

 

[Edit] Oh, and paint it black.

 

RAM013585_front1x2.png

 

 

https://www.gibson.com/en-US/Guitar/DMOWGQ675/Non-Reverse-Thunderbird/Faded-Pelham-Blue

Edited by NancyJohnson
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NancyJohnson said:

On the Gibson Mod-Shop they had a pelham blue NR Thunderbird up for $1.6K last week. 

 

Interestingly, this lacks the scratchplate and the chromed hardware/pickup covers of the current reissues and, to be honest, this looks a whole lot better for it.  The only things I could add to improve things?  Put the Gibson logo back on the truss-rod cover, give it a two part bridge, and cosmetically, line the pots up in a straight line and move the output jack to the lower bout.

 

RAM013585_front1x2.png

 

 

https://www.gibson.com/en-US/Guitar/DMOWGQ675/Non-Reverse-Thunderbird/Faded-Pelham-Blue

Looks very odd without the scratchplate to me, it needs it to complement the body shape otherwise it looks a bit shapeless and unfinished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Divisive.  Maybe it's just the angle of the photograph but without the pickguard to guide the shape, the top "horn" looks out of proportion to me - in the too big kind of way.  Can't put my finger on it, it's just tugging at a thread in my brain.

 

The proportions of the Lull face on to the camera look right.  I think it might be my mind playing tricks on me, or doing anything except the work it's supposed to be doing ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...